Saving enough money to retire on isn't easy. If you're serious about being able to retire comfortably, you're going to have to save a lot of money. Not only that but the money you stash away will have to grow faster than the cost of living. If you want to have a decent retirement, you need to increase the buying power of your money.
It would be nice if you could just put your money into a savings account every month and forget about it. But in a world of low interest rates, that's probably not going to be enough.
As an alternative, you could put all your savings into the stockmarket, but as share prices are currently high, that may not be sensible either.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
To have a comfortable retirement, you probably need to spread your money across different assets, and you'll also need to take some risk.
What is risk?
To most people, investment risk is about losing money. That is a real risk, but you also need to consider another risk: volatility or how much the value ofyour savings pot moves up and down.
Big gains make us feel good, but bigfalls especially ones that occur just before we need our money can be disastrous. Volatility can also playhavoc with our emotions.
If youdon't stay calm, but instead become emotional, you're more likely to chase things that have already gone up a lot, and sell things that have gone down a proven route to investment mediocrity,or worse.
Fortunately, there is a way to getdecent results while keeping volatility (or risks) manageable. It's called asset allocation and is arguably one of the most important lessons an investor can learn.
Asset allocation explained
The best way to reduce risk is to spread it across lots of different investments,which is known as diversification. Havingall your eggs in one basket by keeping all your money in one particular investment is very risky. You might make a fortune, or you might lose everything.
But with asset allocation, you'll have lots of eggs in lots of different baskets. Each basket represents a different type of investment that behaves in aslightly different way to the other baskets. These imaginary baskets are made up of investments such as shares, bonds, cash, property, precious metals and commodities.
They produce different investment returns with different amounts of risk (see below), depending on what's going on in the world. For example, shares and property do well in times of modest inflation; bonds and cash are better for times of recession.
By having some of your money in each basket, you can still achieve reasonable returns while significantly reducing your risk compared, say, to investing all your money in the stockmarket.
The asset-allocation process means you can decide how much you want to have in each basket, depending on how long you are investing for and how much risk you can cope with.
So, a younger investor saving for a long time can afford to have more money in shares because there is enough time for good years to offset bad ones. Conversely, someone close to retirement, or who is risk-averse, would have more money in bonds and cash.
According to a study in 2012 by investment group Vanguard, asset allocation (where you put your money), as opposed to picking individual stocks, is responsible for 88% of a portfolio's returns over time.
How it works
The table below shows the different returns and risks from various UK assets. Over the last 26 years, shares have delivered the best return for investors, but they've also been more risky. That's because the standard deviation for shares has been higher share prices have bumped around a lot.
Government bonds, index-linked bonds and property have produced lower returns, but with less risk. Gold a hedge against really bad things happening has given low returns, but can serve as a decent form of insurance in times of financial crisis.
Spreading your money across different investments doesn't always work out but it has a good track record of reducing risk and protecting you from big losses.
Between 1987 and 2013, someone with 50% in shares, 20% in gilts, 15% in index-linked bonds, 10% in propertyand 5% in gold, who rebalanced every year (buying and selling assets to getback to the target allocation), wouldhave had annual returns of 9%.
That's almost the same as an all-share portfolio, but with a much lowerrisk (standard deviation) of 9.4%. Between 2000 and 2013, this approach would have beaten shares and inflation with lower risk as well.
How to do it
You could buy one of the professionally managed multi-asset funds out there. The problem with these is that theytend to have high charges. Nor are they set up tocater for individual savers' needs and risk appetites. The good news is that you can set up your own multi-asset fund very cheaply with exchange-traded funds and index funds.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Shares
9.3%
16.17%
Government bonds
8.28%
9.7%
Index-linked bonds
4.94%
6.5%
Property
8.69%
10.48%
Gold
4.07%
17.03%
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Phil spent 13 years as an investment analyst for both stockbroking and fund management companies.
After graduating with a MSc in International Banking, Economics & Finance from Liverpool Business School in 1996, Phil went to work for BWD Rensburg, a Liverpool based investment manager. In 2001, he joined ABN AMRO as a transport analyst. After a brief spell as a food retail analyst, he spent five years with ABN's very successful UK Smaller Companies team where he covered engineering, transport and support services stocks.
In 2007, Phil joined Halbis Capital Management as a European equities analyst. He began writing for MoneyWeek in 2010.
How high earners could boost their pension by thousands and cut childcare costs
Monzo launches 11 ETFs via Blackrock to help savers invest
