There is "much to like" in German running shoe maker Adidas's €3.1bn purchase of US rival Reebok, says Lex in the FT. The sportswear group isn't cheap, at about 40% above the average share price over the last three months, but the businesses "complement each other well" and if annual cost savings of €125m a year from 2008 are achieved, that trims the price tag "from 18.5 times to just over 14 times this year's earnings".
What's more, wholesalers "need all the clout they can get with big retail customers", says Camilla Palladino on Breakingviews.com, and the combined group will now "almost match" market leader Nike in size.
But there is a catch. Adidas shareholders could just have gone out and bought Reebok shares without paying the "€1bn or so premium" that Adidas has shelled out. The German group needs to do more than just cut costs, and while it reckons it can do so, by developing Reebok's brand in Europe and Asia and improving its merchandising in the US, not everyone is so sure. Such "revenue synergies are notoriously harder to deliver" than cost-cutting.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Moreover, while shareholders seem to have given Adidas the benefit of the doubt following the 7% jump in Adidas shares that trade on the German Dax index on the news of the deal they should be careful, warns Lex. Adidas shares trade at a "pretty hefty" 18.2 times 2005 earnings, and shoe makers, like the sportspeople who wear them, have a "tendency to stumble whenever things have gone well for a while."
And management distractions during the integration process could benefit Nike in the short term, said a Goldman Sachs analyst on CBS Marketwatch, while in the long-term, Nike's brand strength will protect its franchise from erosion.
John is the executive editor of MoneyWeek and writes our daily investment email, Money Morning. John graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news. John joined MoneyWeek in 2005.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
Who is the richest person in the world?
The top five richest people in the world have a combined net worth of $825 billion. Who takes the crown for the richest person in the world?
By Vaishali Varu Published
Top 10 stocks with highest growth over past decade - from Nvidia, Microsoft to Netflix, which companies made you the most money?
We reveal the 10 global companies with the biggest returns since 2013. One firm has posted an astonishing 9,870% return, meaning a £1,000 investment would now be worth almost £82,000.
By Ruth Emery Published