Technology is partying like it's 1999. In 2013, there were 45 initial public offerings (IPOs) in the sector, the most in 13 years.
Facebook's purchase of internet messaging service WhatsApp last week for $19bn more than the value of firms such as Marriott International and Southwest Airlines made 2014 the strongest start to a year for tech deals since the dotcom bubble peak in 2000.
And there are plenty of signs of irrational exuberance. "No algorithm based on terrestrial mathematics can make [the WhatsApp deal] compute," says Robert Cyran on Breakingviews.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
WhatsApp has 55 staff, 450 million users, and only gets revenues ($1 a year per user) from some of its customers it won't say what proportion. It has foresworn advertising. But Facebook doesn't care, says Cyran. Apparently "growth is the point, not making money".
If you think that sounds like the kind of thing dotcoms used to say a few months before they featured in MoneyWeek's old dotcom disaster of the week' slot, you'd be right.
Back then, there was talk about revenue per eyeball' and other dodgy metrics. Now social networks are trying to establish as big a presence as possible among consumers and worry about how to turn their land grab into profit later.
Valuations are getting ridiculous. Twitter recently reached 32 times sales. This kind of multiple implies that a firm is guaranteed to dominate its global market for the foreseeable future, as Leonid Bershidsky notes on Bloomberg.com, yet in social media, barriers to entry aren't high. And it's not just social media.
Stuart O'Gorman of the Henderson Global Technology Mutual fund points to early-stage tech stocks, such as software company Tableau, which has reached 722 times earnings. IT data analyser Splunk is on 355 times. "The similarities with the last time are quite striking."
Yet so far, "the froth remains contained", says James Mackintosh in the Financial Times. Currently 14 stocks among America's top 1,000 sell for more than ten times sales and book value and 20 times earnings. In 2000, there were around 80.
These stocks have solid stories and are dominated by three sectors: social media, biotech and online shopping. This group has been driven up by investors desperate for growth in a lacklustre post-crisis recovery.
We are only in the 1999 stage of the bubble, with investors fearful of missing out starting to rush in. "In a true bubble, shares would double or triple from here."
Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.
After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.
His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.
Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.
In the doghouse: hundreds of investment funds are underperforming - is it time to sell?
News The latest Spot The Dog research from Bestinvest reveals 151 funds are failing to beat their benchmark. We reveal the worst performers
By Marc Shoffman Published
Nationwide: House prices creep up for the first time in over a year
Nationwide’s latest house price index reveals property prices are finally rising. Will this pattern continue in 2024?
By Vaishali Varu Published