Footfall and tenants down at Capital Shopping Centres
Capital Shopping Centres (CSC) cast a light on the tough retail environment today, reporting falling occupancy levels and footfall so far this year.
Capital Shopping Centres (CSC) cast a light on the tough retail environment today, reporting falling occupancy levels and footfall so far this year.
The firm said it had seen a 2% year-on-year reduction in footfall at its centres for the year to date.
By comparison, UK national retail footfall as measured by Experian fell by 3% in the same period, the firm said.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Occupancy across CSC's centres stands at 94.35%, down 2.4% from the end of 2011 due to post Christmas tenant administrations and expiry of seasonal lettings.
The firm said 3% of CSC's rent roll, 75 units, entered administration in the first quarter of 2012.
"While the UK retail environment remains tough, we continue to benefit from last year's transformational Trafford Centre acquisition as we focus on securing the right retailers in the right places paying the right rents with the objective of achieving strong total returns from our assets," said Chief Executive David Fischel.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
-
Rents rise at slowest pace for four years – is buy-to-let still worth it?
Slowing rental growth and higher property taxes are creating a headache for landlords. Does buy-to-let still offer a good yield?
-
Should you bag a bargain with a half-price investment trust?
Twenty-six investment trusts look cheap by historic standards, with some trading at a discount of more than 50%. Are they a bargain or value trap?