Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
Tax avoidance campaigners have been given the go-ahead to challenge a deal struck between Goldman Sachs and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).
The High Court said UK Uncut could challenge the legality of the arrangement, which the group says saved Goldman Sachs up to £20m by avoiding an interest bill on unpaid tax on bonuses.
HMRC has disputed the amount, with official figures putting the total the investment bank saved at £8m.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The court did not give UK Uncut permission to take forward a claim seeking to quash the deal.
Campaigners argue that an initial error by HMRC about what it could legally collect from Goldman Sachs was not rectified despite the Revenue quickly realising its mistake.
This led to it illegally withdrawing a County Court claim for the money owed without seeking to re-negotiate a deal it had already struck with the bank, according to UK Uncut.
HMRC had argued that since the National Audit Office was producing a report for Parliament into several tax deals the matter should be left to Parliament.
However, Mr Justice Simon said there was "plainly public interest in this matter, and maladministration and legality are separate issues".
Murray Worthy, spokesman for UK Uncut, said: "The public have a right to know why a multi-billion pound investment bank appears to have been let off the tax they owe while vital public services are being cut."
"The government is making a political choice in making ordinary people pay for the economic crisis with their jobs and pensions, rather than clamping down on billions of pounds worth of tax avoidance by big business," he added.
HMRC said it would strongly contest the judicial review.
"Large business tax settlements are a vital part of how HMRC secures tax revenues for the country and without them, Britain's public finances would be seriously damaged," said a spokesman.
"We welcome the opportunity to demonstrate that we acted legally."
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
MoneyWeek is written by a team of experienced and award-winning journalists, plus expert columnists. As well as daily digital news and features, MoneyWeek also publishes a weekly magazine, covering investing and personal finance. From share tips, pensions, gold to practical investment tips - we provide a round-up to help you make money and keep it.
-
MoneyWeek Talks: The funds to choose in 2026Podcast Fidelity's Tom Stevenson reveals his top three funds for 2026 for your ISA or self-invested personal pension
-
Three companies with deep economic moats to buy nowOpinion An economic moat can underpin a company's future returns. Here, Imran Sattar, portfolio manager at Edinburgh Investment Trust, selects three stocks to buy now
