Campaigners to challenge Goldman Sachs tax deal
Tax avoidance campaigners have been given the go-ahead to challenge a deal struck between Goldman Sachs and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).
Tax avoidance campaigners have been given the go-ahead to challenge a deal struck between Goldman Sachs and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).
The High Court said UK Uncut could challenge the legality of the arrangement, which the group says saved Goldman Sachs up to £20m by avoiding an interest bill on unpaid tax on bonuses.
HMRC has disputed the amount, with official figures putting the total the investment bank saved at £8m.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The court did not give UK Uncut permission to take forward a claim seeking to quash the deal.
Campaigners argue that an initial error by HMRC about what it could legally collect from Goldman Sachs was not rectified despite the Revenue quickly realising its mistake.
This led to it illegally withdrawing a County Court claim for the money owed without seeking to re-negotiate a deal it had already struck with the bank, according to UK Uncut.
HMRC had argued that since the National Audit Office was producing a report for Parliament into several tax deals the matter should be left to Parliament.
However, Mr Justice Simon said there was "plainly public interest in this matter, and maladministration and legality are separate issues".
Murray Worthy, spokesman for UK Uncut, said: "The public have a right to know why a multi-billion pound investment bank appears to have been let off the tax they owe while vital public services are being cut."
"The government is making a political choice in making ordinary people pay for the economic crisis with their jobs and pensions, rather than clamping down on billions of pounds worth of tax avoidance by big business," he added.
HMRC said it would strongly contest the judicial review.
"Large business tax settlements are a vital part of how HMRC secures tax revenues for the country and without them, Britain's public finances would be seriously damaged," said a spokesman.
"We welcome the opportunity to demonstrate that we acted legally."
-
Best places to live in England and Wales in 2026 – and how much they costCriteria like value for money, natural beauty, good schools, jobs and a high quality of life are key for those looking at areas to buy a house – but how much will it cost you to live in a high ranking town or city? We reveal the best places to live in England and Wales.
-
London house prices: Is the capital's property boom over?Buyers and investors have always been drawn towards the capital’s property market. But as house prices stall, is the market as lucrative as it once was and are buyers and investors still interested?
