MoD bonuses: a 'travesty of justice'?

Being a civil servant at the Ministry of Defence is a "very difficult and sometimes dangerous job", said Home Secretary Alan Johnson this week. That's why 50,000 of the 85,000 officials working in the department have been granted a total of £47m in bonuses between them since the start of the year.

Dangerous? Well, I'm sure "staple guns can nip a bit", says Dominic Lawson in The Sunday Times. But in reality, this is just part of the bonus culture that has grown beyond banking to become pervasive in the public sector too. Only a "tiny percentage" of these officials have been to Afghanistan. Nor do we know of anyone among the 23,000 staff employed at the MoD's procurement arm who has lost their job, or even their bonus, after an official report in August described it as "incompetent from top to bottom".

The £47m bonus figure is misleading in any case, says Michael Smith, also in The Sunday Times. MoD staff who volunteer to be posted to conflict zones none of whom have lost their lives in Afghanistan are already receiving extra payments of up to £49,500 for a six-month tour. A junior civil servant gets a top-up of £6,750 a month; a senior civil servant receives allowances worth £8,250 a month. A junior infantry soldier, on the other hand, who is paid £16,681 a year, will receive additional allowances of just £595 a month.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

It's a travesty of justice, says Max Hastings in the Daily Mail. I do not know a single soldier, of any rank, "who fails to attribute a host of difficulties since 2001, and a significant proportion of casualties, to mismanagement by government and Whitehall". They bitterly resent the "extravagant rewards" for MoD and Foreign Office civilian staff who work in war zones, which are "far in excess of service pay, for people who face much less risk than the troops". "No army in history has had all the resources it wanted", but Britain is a rich nation and no soldier should "bleed and die for want of sufficient helicopters, body armour, vehicle spare parts, radios and some types of ammunition".

"So goes the familiar and trite argument," says Patrick Hennessey in The Times. A friend of mine who recently left the army and became a civil servant found himself back in Basra, working twice as hard for substantially less money. "Most servicemen I know would rather be confident that the staff supporting them in Whitehall were recruited from the brightest and best To focus on the bonuses instead of the billions of pounds of overspend and delay in dodgy procurement is rather like focusing on MPs' hundred-pound expense bills while the national debt increases by thousands of pounds an hour." Dangerous business: but staple guns can nip a bit too