Hopes that we were embarking on a big Christmas rally took a bit of a pounding yesterday. Stock markets around the world dived.
And little wonder. The National Bureau of Economic Research the US body which officially decides if the country is in recession announced its decision. The US is indeed in recession, and it started in December 2007.
Now that's nothing most of us didn't already know. But for the bulls still out there, it must have come as a bit of a shock to see it in black and white.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
After all, that means that the recession has lasted for a full year. If this was just the little V-shaped blip that many of them were expecting, there should at least be some light at the end of the tunnel by now. Yet things just seem to be getting worse by the day
Economic outlooks around the world are terrible
It wasn't just the official confirmation of a US recession that rattled markets of course. Economic data from around the world was terrible. Data from Purchasing Managers' Index surveys for November showed that manufacturing activity shrunk by the most on record in China, Britain and Russia.
In the UK, the PMI showed that manufacturing activity shrunk more rapidly in November than at any time since records began in 1992. The headline figure fell to 34.4 from October's 40.7 reading (a figure below 50 indicates the sector is contracting).
Meanwhile, Bank of England data showed that new home loan approvals fell again in October, to 32,000. That was the same level as in August, which in turn was a 15-year low. From the peak in 2007, approvals are down 72%.
The grim data saw the pound experience its biggest one-day fall against a basket of major currencies since sterling was kicked out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992. (For more on why the pound is among the world's weakest currencies, see our recent cover story: The great currency crisis and what to do about it).
Traders are betting that the Bank of England will now cut interest rates by a full percentage point on Thursday, after its Monetary Policy Committee meeting, which doesn't seem at all unlikely. But this won't address the core problem that we're facing.
Pumping money into the economy won't solve the problem
The trouble is, global economic growth has been dependent on US consumers for too long. So when they stop spending, the people who make things to sell to them suffer. And in turn, the people who dig up the raw materials, to supply the people who make things, also feel the pain.
One way or another, most of the economies in the world, if not all of them, have become heavily geared to one of these three things consumption, manufacturing, or production of raw materials. And unfortunately it's very difficult for an unbalanced economy to rebalance. It requires a whole new way of thinking, and a fair amount of social upheaval. Which is why most governments and at least a chunk of their populations would rather wind the clock back to the way things were before the big bust.
Enjoying this article? Sign up for our free daily email, Money Morning, to receive intelligent investment advice every weekday. Sign up to Money Morning.
That's why we have central banks across the world slashing interest rates, and governments across the world pumping money into their economies to prop up ailing industries. In the States, the Federal Reserve has now embarked on full-blown money-printing to try to fend off deflation. The technical term for this is "quantitative easing". We'll be looking at this and deflation in more detail in the next issue of MoneyWeek, out on Friday (if you're not already a subscriber, subscribe to MoneyWeek magazine).
But we can't wind the clock back. Rebalancing has to happen. We got into this mess in the first place because the world was flooded with money. We won't make it better by trying to flood it with more.
Money is losing its power
At a very basic level, money is just a method of keeping score. Money is only valuable to society when it performs its function, which is to reward the most productive use of capital. When it's working as it should, it helps us to decide where best to direct limited resources, such as our time and labour.
But money's usefulness has been blunted by central bankers continually focusing on preventing bad investments from going wrong. Former Fed chief Alan Greenspan, the man they once called the 'Maestro', was the main culprit behind this school of central banking. Any time Wall Street looked like losing money on a duff bet, Mr Greenspan was there to bail them out.
But that means money loses its power to help people differentiate between good and bad investments. The biggest rewards tend to go with the riskiest projects, until you reach the point where essentially you're just gambling. The problem is, if you remove risk from the equation, all you're left with is reward.
We've not seen the bottom of the market yet
In other words, the world's central banks have been aiding and abetting rampant speculation, which has sucked money away from productive projects, to be tossed away at the roulette table.
And so we end up with builders who build, not roads, or decent housing, but buy-to-let flats and condos for speculators to 'flip' to each other. We see China left with a glut of factories because it's been relying on US consumers to keep buying plastic rubbish with their property profits.
All of these bad investments are being revealed for the terrible mistakes they were. That's the upside of the recession. The downside is that the boom went on for so long that the unwinding of the bust will be very painful indeed. And there's every chance that the actions of the Fed, and our own government and central banks, will simply draw the process out.
What does that mean for investors? It means we're unlikely to have seen the bottom of the market yet. And it also means that the rush for perceived 'safe havens' will continue. For the time being certainly, gilt yields look set to fall further.
Our recommended article for today
Gold mining shares have not performed anything like as well as the physical metal has this year. But, says Martin Spring, that could easily change when gold's bull market really gets going again.
John is the executive editor of MoneyWeek and writes our daily investment email, Money Morning. John graduated from Strathclyde University with a degree in psychology in 1996 and has always been fascinated by the gap between the way the market works in theory and the way it works in practice, and by how our deep-rooted instincts work against our best interests as investors.
He started out in journalism by writing articles about the specific business challenges facing family firms. In 2003, he took a job on the finance desk of Teletext, where he spent two years covering the markets and breaking financial news. John joined MoneyWeek in 2005.
His work has been published in Families in Business, Shares magazine, Spear's Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Spectator among others. He has also appeared as an expert commentator on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, BBC Radio Scotland, Newsnight, Daily Politics and Bloomberg. His first book, on contrarian investing, The Sceptical Investor, was released in March 2019. You can follow John on Twitter at @john_stepek.
Should your business invest in a VoIP phone service?
Here's what you need to know about VOIP (voice over IP) services before landlines go digital in 2025.
By David Prosser Published
M&S is back in fashion: but how long can this success last?
M&S has exceeded expectations in the past few years, but can it keep up the momentum?
By Rupert Hargreaves Published