China sits out protests in Hong Kong
Beijing may be using harsh language against the protesters in Hong Kong, but if you read between the lines, it is clear that it is treading carefully.

The last two months have seen unprecedented protests in Hong Kong, which continue despite the police using "tear gas and rubber bullets" against demonstrators, and standing by while "thugs" attack them, says The Washington Post. Chinese officials this week broke their silence on the protests. They expressed their confidence in Hong Kong's unpopular leader Carrie Lam, but also adopted an "uncompromising" tone, hinting that Chinese forces could be deployed on the island.
Beijing may be using harsh language, but if you read between the lines, it is clear that it is treading carefully, says Antony Dapiran in The Guardian. Indeed, the very fact that it is acknowledging the peaceful nature of the protests and the fact that they have been successful in forcing change is "remarkable", especially "when such a possibility is unthinkable on the mainland". Its support of Lam was qualified by "veiled criticism" of her policies, especially in the way that the extradition bill, the original spark for the protest, had been handled. And Beijing's implicit recognition that this is "a purely domestic problem for Hong Kong" would seem to rule out direct military intervention.
If China thought it could get away with deploying troops on the streets of Hong Kong, it would, says Gideon Rachman in the FT. What's stopping it is a fear that it would not be able to consolidate control given local resistance and that such a move would provoke a loss of confidence, "prompting, international businesses to pull out of the territory". It would also raise the likelihood of American sanctions many protestors are "eager to see America withdraw Hong Kong's special privileges, despite the economic damage that would do", not only to Hong Kong but the wider Chinese economy. For the moment, it seems most likely that China will wait the demonstrations out, hoping they will lose momentum. "But the protest movement seems to be escalating, rather than fading away."
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.
Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.
-
Dividends: Reliability in uncertain times
Dividends have formed over half of the total return of the UK market over the last 20 years. Dividend strategies have been under-appreciated while investors have focused on US mega cap technology. Income strategies may have more appeal in a tougher investment climate
By MoneyWeek Published
-
Trump’s tariffs: what is he thinking and how should UK respond?
Every right-thinking person knows that free trade is a surer route to the wealth of nations than protectionism, says Stuart Watkins. What is Trump thinking?
By Stuart Watkins Published