MPs’ expenses scandal lives on
A decade on from the MPs' expenses scandal and little has changed.
"Nearly a decade ago, in the wake of the expenses scandal, parliament declared itself thoroughly cleaned up," says The Daily Telegraph. It has now been revealed that, following a "series of creeping rule changes", some MPs are able to claim nearly double the amount to which they were previously entitled.
Before 2009, MPs were able to claim up to £24,000 for buying and furnishing a London property. Some were claiming for mortgage interest and, when the properties were sold, avoiding capital gains tax and pocketing the gains. In 2010 it was decided that MPs could claim up to £1,450 a month to rent a second home in London.
Over the years, additional payments for dependent children have become more generous. Today, MPs can claim £5,435 a year for each "dependent" child under 21. As a result, they are "increasingly claiming" that children over 18 who do not live with them are dependents.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The fact that the total amount claimed is edging up to pre-2009 levels should come as "no surprise", says Tom Harris on CapX. Rental costs are frequently higher than an interest-only mortgage. The previous system was "cynically exploited", but we do need a system that doesn't leave MPs "out of pocket" when they're in London. The case for an annual flat rate payment needs to be made. Spending more than necessary on repayments to MPs and on an "expensive and cumbersome" quango (Ipsa) to oversee them is unsustainable.
When dreaming up a new system, we should also consider the effect that the 2009 "public shaming" has had on British politics, says Douglas Murray on UnHerd. It has discouraged the bright, talented people with a variety of "lucrative side careers" from entering politics. The House of Commons today is increasingly full of people who are "timid, limited" career politicians "for whom politics is absolutely everything and who, therefore, have very little to bring to it".
Emily has extensive experience in the world of journalism. She has worked on MoneyWeek for more than 20 years as a former assistant editor and writer. Emily has previously worked on titles including The Times as a Deputy Features Editor, Commissioning Editor at The Independent Sunday Review, The Daily Telegraph, and she spent three years at women's lifestyle magazine Marie Claire as a features writer for three years, early on in her career.
On MoneyWeek, Emily’s coverage includes Brexit and global markets such as Russia and China. Aside from her writing, Emily is a Nutritional Therapist and she runs her own business called Root Branch Nutrition in Oxfordshire, where she offers consultations and workshops on nutrition and health.
-
Woodford investors receive £185 million in compensation
It is almost five years since the Woodford Equity Income Fund was suspended. After a High Court ruling in February, investors are in line for some compensation, the watchdog has said.
By Katie Williams Published
-
What are the “Granolas”? Discover the 11 stocks driving European equity markets
Europe’s equity markets are being propelled forward by eleven key stocks, including GlaxoSmithKline, Nestlé and L'Oréal. Why are they called the Granolas and should you invest in them?
By Katie Williams Published