Can cash really trump shares?

Conventional wisdom holds that shares are the best place for your money in the long term, and cash in the short. But is this accurate, asks Natalie Stanton.

Most advisers would agree that, over the long term, shares are the best place for your money. And in the short term you're best to stick with cash. However, is this long-held wisdom necessarily true?

In this week's Financial Times, consumer champion Paul Lewis sets out his argument that cash can in fact beat the stockmarket in periods of up to 18 years. His case goes like this. Lewis found that, since 1995, "active cash" in other words, money kept in a best-buy account, then transferred a year later to the most up-to-date best-buy account would have yielded a higher return than investing in an HSBC FTSE 100 tracker fund.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Charter Savings Bank1.66%
OakNorth Bank1.65%
Habib Bank Zurich1.55%
Axis Bank1.40%
Sainsbury's Bank1.30%

Natalie joined MoneyWeek in March 2015. Prior to that she worked as a reporter for The Lawyer, and a researcher/writer for legal careers publication the Chambers Student Guide. 

She has an undergraduate degree in Politics with Media from the University of East Anglia, and a Master’s degree in International Conflict Studies from King’s College, London.