Two colourful but risky corporate bonds

Brewer Innis & Gunn and rugby club Wasps are looking to raise money directly from investors. Should you take up their offers? Cris Sholto Heaton investigates.


Wasps are too risky a proposition

Smaller companies are increasingly raising loans directly from the public instead of banks and last week we saw two especially colourful examples. Innis & Gunn, an Edinburgh-based brewer, wants to raise £3m-£6m to construct a new brewery, via a four-year mini-bond with an annual interest rate of 7.25% or 9% if you're willing to be paid in beer. And rugby club Wasps is refinancing the loan it used to buy its new stadium through a £35m seven-year retail bond paying 6.5%.

For firms, deals like these are a way to get loans at lower rates than banks charge. For fans or customers, they offer a way to back something that matters to them. But is there anything here for investors?

Back the Wasps

By contrast, retail bonds are listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and are traded in small blocks: most can be dealt in sizes as small as £100 after they float. It's important to be aware that investing in a bond is not like putting your cash in a savings account: if the company is unable to pay you back, you are not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, so you could lose your money. Since retail bonds are traded on the LSE, you should be able to sell before the bond matures if you need to, but the price may be less than you paid.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Retail bonds are a great idea, in principle. They allow investors to build their own bond portfolios, instead of having to invest in corporate bond funds. But the retail bond market is still small (around 100 bonds at present) and demand from investors is fierce. So yields on retail bonds tend to be too low compared to similar corporate bonds owned by institutions and that looks like the case with the Wasps bond.

The headline 6.5% yield may seems moderately attractive at first, given that it's secured against the stadium. But Wasps looks risky (it's making losses at the operating level). And while the stadium's been valued at £48.5m, it's hard to be sure of the true resale value of an asset like this if the club went bust. Other investors may disagree, but in my view the return doesn'tcompensate for the risk.

Help build a brewery

The Innis & Gunn mini-bond struggles on both these scores. The 7.25% coupon isn't anywhere near enough to compensate for the lack of liquidity, in my opinion, while the information in the offer document isn't sufficient to form a view on the firm's prospects. For somebody who likes these beers and wants to help the firm to expand with some spare cash, the offer might be OK but as an investment, this kind of deal makes no sense at all.

The jargon explained

First, the jargon. The interest payment you receive from a bond is known as the coupon. These will typically be paid every six months, even though the interest rate will be quoted as an annual figure. When the bond matures (on the maturity date), you get back your initial investment, which is known as the principal, face value or par value.

While the coupon tells you how much interest you'll get, it doesn't represent your overall return on the bond. That's because when you buy a bond in the market, you may pay more or less for it than the value of the principal you'll get back at maturity meaning that you may make a capital loss or gain. So it's important to consider the yield to maturity, which measures your total return if you hold the bond until it matures.

If the company defaults (doesn't pay the interest or principal), your return will be worse. So you need to consider how strong the borrower's finances are. Unlike investors in shares, who care about after-tax earnings, debt investors often focus on earnings before interest tax depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) as an imperfect way of measuring how much cash the firm can generate to keep paying its debts.

Key ratios to consider are leverage (the ratio of the company's debt to its Ebitda lower is better) and interest coverage (the ratio of Ebitda to interest payments higher is better).

For a short and readable introduction to investing in riskier bonds, one useful book is How to Make Money With Junk Bonds by Robert Levine (McGraw-Hill, £13.99).


// ]]>

Cris Sholto Heaton

Cris Sholto Heaton is an investment analyst and writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2006 and was managing editor of the magazine between 2016 and 2018. He is especially interested in international investing, believing many investors still focus too much on their home markets and that it pays to take advantage of all the opportunities the world offers. He often writes about Asian equities, international income and global asset allocation.

Cris began his career in financial services consultancy at PwC and Lane Clark & Peacock, before an abrupt change of direction into oil, gas and energy at Petroleum Economist and Platts and subsequently into investment research and writing. In addition to his articles for MoneyWeek, he also works with a number of asset managers, consultancies and financial information providers.

He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and the Investment Management Certificate, as well as degrees in finance and mathematics. He has also studied acting, film-making and photography, and strongly suspects that an awareness of what makes a compelling story is just as important for understanding markets as any amount of qualifications.