Slash spending and taxes

So just how bad are things in Britain? Dr Tim Morgan of Tullett Prebon appears to be on a mission to make sure no one thinks for a second that the answer is anything but "awful".

He's been circulating a UK economy primer that sums up our problems all too clearly: the economy has for too long been "excessively dependent" on the "twin drivers of private borrowing and public spending". Both are now dead in the water, something that has left 70% of the economy in "growth lockdown".

At the same time, Britain is so over-leveraged that the government has had no choice but to focus on deficit cutting and find novel ways to finance its debt (Osborne's new plan to issue 100-year gilts into the world's yield-starved bond markets).

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

But the deficit plan it insists on following depends largely on growth and hence on rising tax revenues, rather than on genuinely large cuts in spending. Without the twin drivers mentioned above there is no growth. The upshot? If we carry on as we are, we get to keep the deficit and the debt and we get to have a stagnant economy too. Not good.

So what's the solution? According to Morgan, it is to cut spending a lot. There is, he says, a widespread idea that Britain cannot cut public spending any more than the "modest real-term 6.8% currently planned". Nonsense. "Between 1990-2000 and 2009-2010 real state expenditures increased by 53%. No one has yet explained why the British state must somehow spend about £700bn today having managed perfectly well on £450bn (at today's values) ten years ago."

The truth is that we're just getting worse value than we used to. So we should really slash spending and also slash taxes to get growth moving too. Then we need to get going with the much discussed but little acted on microeconomic reform, rejecting our "over-regulated slow growth economy" for a deregulated, more dynamic one.

There isn't much to argue with in this. I had it in mind when I went tointerview Mary Portas this week. She thinks she has something of a solution for Britain. She's using a factory just outside Manchester to produce a new range of knickers for sale across the UK. She's hired eight of the UK's one million unemployed young people in the process, and her short-term plan is to prove that it is possible to manufacture good-quality goods at a reasonable price without going to China.

Her longer-term plan is to try to persuade other people to do the same. You can read the interview, and watch her new programme (Mary's Bottom Line) on Thursday nights on Channel 4 if you want to see just how she's done it.

Then if you have any better ideas about how we can put some life back into our suffering communities or our manufacturing industry (or both), you can go tomy blog (or send me a tweet to @merrynsw) and tell us.