Cost of West Coast Rail blunder could be 'very much larger' than 50m

The infamous botched West Coast rail contract is set to cost at least 50m pounds, and could be ever larger, MPs revealed Tuesday.

The infamous botched West Coast rail contract is set to cost at least 50m pounds, and could be ever larger, MPs revealed Tuesday.

According to a report by the Commons Public Accounts committee, the collapse of the deal was the result of a series of mistakes by civil servants and a 'lack of leadership'.

Labour MP Margaret Hodge, who is the Chairman of the committee, said: "The franchising process was littered with basic errors. The department yet again failed to learn from previous disasters, like the Metronet contract. It failed to heed advice from its lawyers. It failed to respond appropriately to early warning signs that things were going wrong.

"Senior management did not have proper oversight of the project. Cuts in staffing and in consultancy budgets contributed to a lack of key skills.

"The project suffered from a lack of leadership. There was no single person responsible from beginning to end and, therefore, no one who had to live with the consequences of bad policy decisions.

"For three months, there was no single person in charge at all. Not only that, there was no senior civil servant in the team responsible for the work, despite the critical importance of this multi-billion pound franchise."

The contract, which was originally awarded to FirstGroup, fell through after Vigrin Trains complained about the way it was operated. Virgin, which previously held the contract, will continue to do so until November 2014, when a new bidding process will begin.

The Committee also said the handling of the deal showed a "complete lack of common sense" and warned the cost of the fall out might be "very much larger" than the sum of £50m. The report detailed "fundamental errors" and "previous disasters".

Last month a seperate report by the Commons Transport Committee attributed the blunders to "irresponsible decisions" by the Transport Department.

Recommended

Imperial Brands has an 8.3% yield – but what’s the catch?
Share tips

Imperial Brands has an 8.3% yield – but what’s the catch?

Tobacco company Imperial Brands boasts an impressive dividend yield, and the shares look cheap. But investors should beware, says Rupert Hargreaves. H…
20 May 2022
Investing in drugmakers: uncommon profits from curing rare diseases
Share tips

Investing in drugmakers: uncommon profits from curing rare diseases

Treatments for medical conditions with only a small number of sufferers can still be very attractive for pharmaceutical companies and investors becaus…
20 May 2022
Share tips of the week – 20 May
Share tips

Share tips of the week – 20 May

MoneyWeek’s comprehensive guide to the best of this week’s share tips from the rest of the UK's financial pages.
20 May 2022
Delivering profits: should you buy Royal Mail shares?
Share tips

Delivering profits: should you buy Royal Mail shares?

The volume of parcels delivered by Royal Mail soared during the pandemic, and so did its profits. But it has been coming under pressure lately. So, as…
19 May 2022

Most Popular

Barry Norris: we’re already in the 1970s. Here’s how to invest
Investment strategy

Barry Norris: we’re already in the 1970s. Here’s how to invest

Merryn talks to Barry Norris of Argonaut capital about the parallels between now and the 1970s; the transition to “green” energy; and the one sector w…
19 May 2022
The ten highest dividend yields in the FTSE 100
Income investing

The ten highest dividend yields in the FTSE 100

Rupert Hargreaves looks at the FTSE 100’s top yielding stocks for income investors to consider.
18 May 2022
Share tips of the week – 20 May
Share tips

Share tips of the week – 20 May

MoneyWeek’s comprehensive guide to the best of this week’s share tips from the rest of the UK's financial pages.
20 May 2022