Cover of MoneyWeek magazine issue no 804, Friday 29 July 2016

The ignominious fall of Philip Green

27 July 2016 / Issue 804

Sir Philip Green, the former owner of BHS, has been branded the “unacceptable face of capitalism” by MPs investigating the retailer’s collapse. Is that fair? Read this week's cover story here.

• Why Brexit will leave Britain better off
• Profit from the fight against online crime
• Delivery drones take to the air

Not a subscriber? Sign up now


Merryn Somerset WebbEDITOR'S LETTER

Merryn Somerset Webb

The unacceptable face of modern capitalism. That’s a phrase you will have heard a lot recently. It’s also one that you are going to hear a lot more in the context of BHS, of our new prime minister’s campaign to improve corporate behaviour, and of the financial industry’s attempt to have a go at doing something about executive pay (the Investment Association has come up with a few feeble suggestions).

However, you are unlikely to hear it in the context of what I suspect historians will see as the really unacceptable face of modern capitalism – the way it is distorted by our institutions. This week RBS sent 1.3 million customers a letter notifying them of a change in their terms and conditions: they can now be charged interest on cash they have on deposit at the bank. That isn’t going to happen right now. But it makes it clear that our banks are taking seriously a possibility that was considered totally nuts only a few years ago – that the Bank of England could cut rates below zero.

Central bankers think that this type of extreme monetary policy helps (“stimulates”) economies. We aren’t so sure. As far as we can see it drives wealth inequality. It pushes savers to save more rather than less (if you aren’t getting a return on your cash you need to save more cash to end up with the amount you want). It keeps bad companies going under.

And it prevents good companies from investing as they would normally – partly because bad companies are creating oversupply and partly because of the fear of the future it creates: if the Monetary Policy Committee thinks things are so bad it has to resort to this kind of thing, why would anyone feel like taking risks? Look at it like this and it may be that the unacceptable face of modern capitalism turns out to be just as much Mark Carney as it does Philip Green.

The good news is that the UK’s efforts to break free from the various capitalism-distorting exploitations that make up the EU seem to be going pretty well. We won’t know what the short-term economic impact has been for some time yet. But the long-term outlook looks fine. We have a perfectly respectable new government. Most economists have accepted that Brexit will have a negligible influence on the global economy.

Our stockmarkets have pulled themselves together (the FTSE 250 closed above its level of 22 June on Tuesday). The list of economies keen to make trade deals with us is growing (we don’t need these to trade with those economies, of course, but low tariffs are good in themselves).

With all this in mind, MoneyWeek would like to find a less miserable word than Brexit to use to describe what the UK is up to. So far the best suggestion has been “Brenaissance”. But we reckon MoneyWeek readers can do better than that. Send your ideas to and we’ll announce the winning entry in two weeks’ time. The winner gets the magazine free for a year and there’s some (French – sorry) wine for the runners-up.