The saver, from London, bought the winning bond in January 2026 and has a total holding of £45,500. The winning bond number is 659VC982054.

The second jackpot winner is from Norwich and bagged the £1 million with a bond bought in January 2022. Their winning bond number is 484QT130447 and they hold the maximum total of £50,000 in Premium Bonds.

How many prizes will be issued in September’s Premium Bonds draw?

As well as the two £1 million jackpot payout, almost 100 Premium Bonds prizes worth £100,000 will be handed out in the September draw by NS&I. There will also be 192 £50,000 prizes and 381 £25,000 prizes.

More than 6.5 million prizes worth £497 million will be distributed in the September draw.

A total of 858 million prizes worth £42.8 billion have been awarded since the first Premium Bonds draw in 1957.

Here is the breakdown of all the prizes that will be shared out this month:

Source: NS&I

How to check if you've won in September’s prize draw

The two £1 million winners are notified in person by NS&I’s Agent Million each month.

Winners of the £100,000 and lower Premium Bonds prizes can check if they have won the day after the first working day of each month. For September 2026, that date is 2 September.

You can do this by using the Premium Bonds prize checker app, visiting the NS&I website or via Amazon Alexa.

The prize checker app and website will show you prizes you’ve won that month, anything you’ve won in the previous six draws and any older prizes you haven’t claimed yet.

Make sure you have your bond number or NS&I number so you can access your account.

There is no time limit to claim a Premium Bonds prize so you should check if you’ve won anything before and didn’t realise, even if you bought the Premium Bonds years ago.

NS&I says over 99% of prizes have been paid to winners since draws began in 1957, but there are still 2.8 million left unclaimed.

Property portal Rightmove analysed asking price growth in commuter towns linked to six of Britain's largest cities: London, Manchester, Birmingham, Bristol, Glasgow and Cardiff.

Of the cities analysed, the strongest asking price growth is concentrated in commuter locations by Glasgow and Manchester, with 10 of the top 15 fastest-growing hotspots located here.

Asking prices are rising fastest in more affordable commuter areas, Rightmove said, but falling in some higher-priced locations.

Colleen Babcock, property expert at Rightmove said the research shows two very different stories playing out in the UK’s commuter markets.

“In the more affordable locations around Glasgow and Manchester, asking prices are rising strongly as buyers look for value within reach of major cities,” she said.

“Meanwhile, some of the more expensive commuter hotspots are seeing prices ease, which could create opportunities for buyers who may previously have been priced out.

“For anyone considering a move, it's a reminder that looking a little further beyond the main city locations can often open up more options and better value for money."

Glasgow and the North dominate list of commuter hotspots with the fastest rising asking prices

Asking prices for homes in Falkirk, a commuter town of Glasgow, had the highest annual change among the cities listed, with growth of 13.5%.

The average asking price for home in the town is now £183,596, just lower than the average asking price in Scotland of £199,888, according to Rightmove in August.

Clark Gillespie, director at Forth and Clyde Property, an estate agent in Falkirk, said the city is “an attractive choice for buyers because it offers a combination of affordability, strong transport links and excellent family amenities”.

The town has good transport connections to nearby hubs like Edinburgh and Stirling too, meaning “it's a practical option for commuters who want to stay connected to major cities while getting more for their money”.

Beyond Falkirk, towns near Glasgow dominate the list of commuter hotspots with the fastest-growing asking prices, with six locations earning a place in the top 15.

Several of Manchester’s commuter towns have also seen strong asking prices growth, with four ranking in the top 15.

Asking prices for homes in Rochdale have grown by 8.7% in the past year, the second-fastest of those analysed, bringing the average to £238,115. The suburb has asking prices lower than the average for the North West, which stood at £273,421 according to Rightmove in August.

Other notable Manchester commuter towns with fast-growing asking prices are St Helens (7.8%), Wigan (6.2%), and Stalybridge (5.6%).

Source: Rightmove, 24 August

London’s commuter hubs dominate list of asking price falls

Average asking prices in many towns serving London have fallen, representing 11 of the bottom 15 commuter towns.

Haywards Heath in West Sussex, a commuter town for the capital, has seen the biggest price fall of 4.8% since last year, Rightmove’s analysis found. Here, the average asking price is now £461,066, just below the average of £469,604 in the South East of England.

Meanwhile, asking prices in Maidenhead, Berkshire have fallen by 3.9% in the past year, bringing them to £571,686.

London does have one commuter town that bucks this trend. Broxbourne in Hertfordshire had the third-strongest asking price growth at 8.1%.

Some of Bristol’s commuter hubs have also seen asking prices fall. Asking prices for homes in Bath fell by 3.8% in the past year, while those in Yate, a suburb of the city, fell by 2.3%.

Source: Rightmove, 24 August

The number of people having to pay dividend tax has almost doubled in the six years since 2020, when 1.81 million were liable to pay it.

The spike comes after successive cuts to the dividend tax allowance. The allowance was lowered from £2,000 to £1,000 in April 2023, then halved again to £500 in April 2024.

Around 630,000 individuals were brought into paying dividend tax when the allowance was cut from £2,000 to £1,000, according to the FOI figures obtained from HMRC by wealth management firm Quilter shared exclusively with MoneyWeek.

A further 480,000 were dragged into paying dividend tax when the allowance was cut from £1,000 to £500.

Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, said: “These figures show how dramatically the dividend tax net has expanded in a relatively short period.

“While much attention is given to frozen income tax thresholds, the sharp reduction in the dividend allowance has quietly pulled hundreds of thousands of people into paying tax on investment income for the first time.

"The government has repeatedly said it wants to encourage greater participation in investing, but reducing the tax-free allowance has moved in the opposite direction by increasing both the tax burden and administrative complexity faced by ordinary investors,” Griffin added.

Source: Quilter

How does dividend tax work?

Dividends are paid to you if you own shares in a company. You don’t pay income tax on any dividends if your income is less than the £12,570 personal allowance.

You also receive a dividend allowance which means if you do pay income tax you can earn up to a certain amount before owing income tax on dividends. For the 2026/27 year, the dividend allowance is £500.

The tax rate you pay depends on your income tax band:

• Basic rate - 10.75%
• Higher rate - 35.75%
• Additional rate - 39.35%

As an example, if you received £3,000 in dividends and earned £29,570 in wages in the 2026/27 year, your total income would be £32,570.

Taking your personal allowance of £12,570 off this figure would leave you with a taxable income of £20,000.

As you are in the basic rate income tax band, you would pay 20% tax on £17,000 of wages, no tax on £500 of dividends because of the dividend allowance and 10.75% tax on £2,500 of dividends.

How to protect your dividends from the taxman

You can’t do much about falling dividend tax allowances, but there are ways to lower your dividend tax bill with HMRC.

Use a stocks and shares ISA

Dividends paid on investments held in stocks and shares ISAs are free from tax and don’t take up any of your £500 dividend allowance.

You can put up to £20,000 into a stocks and shares ISA each tax year.

Griffin, from Quilter, said: “Making full use of ISAs remains one of the most valuable planning opportunities available, particularly as the dividend allowance is now just £500.”

Do a ‘Bed and ISA’

If you have investments held outside a tax-wrapper, for example in a General Investment Account (GIA), you could consider transferring them across to an ISA.

The process is known as ‘Bed and ISA’, and involves selling investments in a taxable investment account and immediately buying them back inside a tax-wrapped account.

Investments transferred into an ISA will benefit from tax-free growth.

Transferring assets between spouses

You can transfer shares to a spouse or civil partner who either pays income tax at a lower rate or hasn’t utilised some or any of their dividend allowance.

By doing this, you’re effectively making the most of two sets of allowances.

Ade Babatunde, senior financial planning director at wealth manager Rathbones, said: “Sharing ownership of company shares between spouses or civil partners can allow both parties to utilise their allowances and lower-rate tax bands before higher dividend tax rates begin to apply.”

Consider alternative investments

If you’ve got the risk appetite, you could invest your money in a Venture Capital Trust (VCT).

VCTs are set up to fund younger businesses with high growth potential, and dividends and capital gains on ordinary shares aren’t taxed.

You also receive 20% income tax relief on up to £200,000 held in shares in a VCT, so long as those shares are held for at least five years.

One major drawback to VCTs is that because they invest in early-stage companies, there is a greater risk they could fail and your investments drop in value. For that reason, they can be a good option if you have maxed out your ISA and pension allowances for the financial year.

The latter is not a cheap option. Renting in retirement will now cost an average of £419,000 as rents are expected to more than double in the next 20 years, according to new research from retirement specialist Standard Life.

While data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows rents are an average of £1,160 today, this could climb to £2,350 by 2046 if they continue to grow by an average of 3.8% a year, the research shows.

The high cost means those who plan to rent into their retirement will need to ensure their pension pots support that choice.

But ONS data shows the average pension wealth for someone aged 65 to 74 was just £145,900 in 2022 – much less than the rental costs over a 20 year retirement.

It means pensioners are at risk of not having enough to pay for their housing costs if they do not own a house and plan to rent when they retire.

Pete Cowell, head of annuities at Standard Life said: “For a growing number of people, housing costs could be the single biggest expense they face in later life, adding many thousands of pounds a year to the income needed to maintain a minimum standard of living.

“While support is available for those on the lowest incomes, many retirees will still need to plan for how ongoing housing costs will be met over the long term.”

Although it is expensive, more people are now renting in retirement. Data from the government’s Pensions Commission shows the proportion of households renting privately in retirement has more than doubled in the last 20 years.

Cowell added: “As renting in later life becomes more common, planning how those costs will be met is likely to become one of the most important financial decisions people make.

“Whether through savings, guaranteed retirement income products or a combination of both, having a clear plan for meeting those costs can make a significant difference to long-term financial security.”

The true cost of renting in retirement where you are

If you are planning to rent during your retirement, you will need to take a careful look at your pension pot and work out if you can afford to do so where you are as prices vary wildly across the UK.

The most expensive place to rent as a pensioner is London, where the average price of a year’s rent is £28,520.

That works out to £859,000 when over the course of a standard 20-year retirement, factoring in rental price growth.

The region with the second-highest expected renting cost is the South East, where the average for a year is £17,610 or £531,000 over 20 years – much lower than the price in the capital, but still far more than in cheaper regions of the UK.

As with house prices, there is a large North-South divide in rental costs as the North of England and the devolved nations are much cheaper than the South of England.

The cheapest region to rent in retirement is the North East of England, where a year’s rent costs an average of £9,670. This amounts to £291,000 over 20 years.

Meanwhile, the second-cheapest region is Yorkshire and the Humber, where the average rent for a year is £10,650 – or £321,000 over a 20 year retirement.

The interactive map below shows the projected cost of renting during a 20-year retirement.

Should you rent in retirement?

While renting in retirement is expensive, there are also some positive sides to renting rather than owning your own home.

“If you decide to rent, then you have the flexibility to move around without the burden of having to sell a home,” said Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at wealth manager Hargreaves Lansdown.

This may mean you can be closer to your loved ones, or you may choose to move to a cheaper part of the country or one that fits your lifestyle better.

Certain maintenance problems with the home you rent will also be the responsibility of the landlord, meaning you will not need to fork to fix a leaky roof, for example.

Additionally, if you do not expect to pay off your mortgage before the end of your retirement, renting can be a more flexible solution and potentially a cheaper option depending on where you live.

There are of course drawbacks, the main one being that the home you rent is owned by your landlord, so you do not have the final say on what happens to the property.

In the worst-case scenario, you may be evicted from your home, though the new Renters’ Rights Act means this is much more difficult for landlords.

If you own your home instead, you will not need to worry about being evicted or getting approval to make changes to your property. Once you have paid off your mortgage, you will have far lower monthly costs too, meaning you will have more money in your pocket each month.

“Going into retirement owning your own home means your day-to-day expenses will likely be lower,” said Morrissey. “You can also use your home to release money either through equity release, or downsizing, should you need it.”

Ultimately, whether you should rent in retirement is dependent on your lifestyle, whether you already own a house, and whether you can afford it with your pension.

HMRC is kickstarting a campaign this month to offer top-ups to people who didn’t receive pension tax relief because of the way their workplace pension scheme was administered.

Workers whose occupational pension schemes issue tax relief through a net pay arrangement (NPA) could be entitled to the top-up.

A NPA is when pension contributions are taken out of your monthly pay before tax is calculated. It means you receive tax relief there and then.

Typically, people earning £10,000 or more a year are automatically enrolled into workplace pension schemes, but under an NPA method, those earning between this amount and £12,570, and therefore not paying income tax, aren’t eligible for pension tax relief.

If these same people were in a workplace pension scheme using the relief at source (RAF) method, the employer automatically would claim tax relief from the government to add to their pension and they would benefit from pension tax relief.

Employees have no choice in whether they are signed up to a workplace scheme that uses the NPA or RAF method.

The government is seeking to compensate these lower earners who have been in NPA occupational schemes from 2024/25 onwards and estimates that around one million people are affected, of which 75% are women who may have earned less due to working part time or taking a career break.

The top-ups are worth £70 on average and will be paid by bank transfer.

When will I receive the top-up?

From this month, HMRC will start contacting the one million eligible people via letters in the post or through their personal tax account.

HMRC said these letters or notes on personal tax accounts will explain what people need to do to accept payments, which are expected to start being claimed over the "coming months”.

The letters will be rolled out gradually and into early 2027, HMRC said.

“Real risk” low earners won’t claim free money

Steve Webb, former pensions minister and now partner at pension consultants LCP, warned that people unexpectedly receiving these letters offering them money may think they're a scam and not claim what they’re entitled to.

Webb said: “The process of getting these payments to the right people is going to be incredibly painful and there is a real risk of huge non take-up.

“Most people will not have a clue about this issue and may be suspicious of a letter out of the blue from HMRC offering them free money.”

Webb is urging people to check their post in the coming weeks to make sure they do not miss out.

An HMRC spokesperson said: "We know some people may be cautious about unexpected contact, which is why we provide clear information about what to expect and how to verify the contact is genuine.

“Customers can check a letter is genuine on gov.uk and should only respond via official HMRC channels. We’ll never ask for passwords, PINs or money to be transferred to claim a payment.”

Will I be entitled to a top-up in future years?

The process set up by HMRC is offering top-ups to people who may have missed out on pension tax relief in 2024/25.

Once registered, these low earners are expected to receive the top-ups through a more automated system for future years, if they’re still eligible, Webb said.

HMRC will assess eligibility each tax year and so you may qualify for a payment this year but not future payments.

The building society’s one and two-year fixed rate cash ISAs are now paying respective rates of 4.5% and 4.55% AER, up from 4.4% and 4.5% earlier this month.

Its one and two-year taxable fixed rate bonds now have interest rates of 4.5% and 4.55%, respectively, a rise from 4.25% and 4.3%.

It’s the second time this month Nationwide has bumped up rates on its fixed rate bonds and ISAs.

How do the savings accounts work?

Fixed rate cash ISAs

You can open one of the ISAs if you’re 18 or over, a UK resident and you haven’t maxed out your £20,000 annual ISA allowance this tax year.

People under 65 face a £12,000 per year limit on cash ISA contributions from April 2027. The overall £20,000 annual ISA allowance will remain.

If you are a new Nationwide customer, you have to apply for the ISA in a Nationwide branch. You can find your nearest branch using the building society’s search tool.

You have to fund the ISA during the application and can’t open it then top it up later. You can fund one of the accounts through an ISA transfer or via another Nationwide account.

You can withdraw money from one of the fixed-rate ISAs before the end of the term, but would have to pay an early access charge.

At the end of the term, the money from the account is moved to an instant access cash ISA with a lower interest rate.

Fixed rate bonds

Nationwide’s fixed rate bonds can be opened in branch or online if you’re 16 or over and a UK resident with an email address.

Once the fixed rate accounts are open, you can’t access your money until the end of the term. You can save up to £5 million in the accounts – although the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) only protects up to £120,000 per person, per banking licence.

Money must be paid into the bond within 14 days of opening it. At the end of the term, your savings are moved to an instant access savings account paying a lower interest rate.

Are the boosted savings accounts worth it?

The headline interest rates on both the one and two-year fixed-rate cash ISAs can be beaten by other savings accounts on the market, based on the latest data from Moneyfactscompare as of 27 August.

AlRayan Bank’s one-year fixed-rate cash ISA pays 4.72% while Vida Savings has a two-year fixed-rate cash ISA paying 4.77%.

You’ll also find better headline rates on one and two-year fixed-rate bonds – AlRayan Bank’s one-year fixed-term bond is paying 4.87% interest while Investec Save’s two-year fixed-rate saver is paying 4.95%.

However, if you want to bank with an established name, Nationwide’s bumper rates on its one and two-year fixed-rate ISAs could be a good choice.

The two cash ISAs are paying higher rates for these types of accounts than the ‘Big Four’ banks – NatWest, Barclays, Lloyds and HSBC.

Nationwide’s one-year fixed-rate bond is much less competitive compared to other options on the market, but still offers the best rate out of the Big Four.

The two-year fixed-rate bond is also not as competitive and you can get a better rate with NatWest which is offering a two-year fixed term savings account paying 4.75%.

Rachel Springall, finance expert at Moneyfactscompare, said Nationwide customers can get in-person support at branches too, something a lot of digital banks don’t provide.

“Customers who find digital banking difficult, such as for accessibility reasons, will need to look beyond top rates to find a brand that can cater to their personal needs,” Springall said.

She added: “The fixed-rate cash ISAs from Nationwide are accessible for savers with either small or larger pots, with its minimum investment limit set at just £1, plus transfers in from both cash and stocks and shares ISAs are [currently] accepted. Those who do find they need their money sooner can even access the ISA funds early, subject to a set penalty.”

Most unspent pensions will become subject to inheritance tax (IHT) in April 2027, which could leave some families facing IHT, an income tax bill and the loss of the residence nil-rate band allowance.

How families could be hit

Everyone has an allowance known as the nil-rate band which means estates worth less than £325,000 are not subject to IHT.

You can also benefit from a further £175,000 allowance known as the residence nil-rate band if you are passing your home to a direct descendant such as a child or grandchild.

Any unused amounts from these two allowances can be passed onto a spouse or civil partner, meaning some estates worth up to £1 million have no IHT liability.

However, the residence nil-rate band is cut by £1 for every £2 an estate is worth over £2 million.

If you are single, you lose your entire residence nil-rate band once your estate is worth £2.35 million or more and if you are in a couple you lose it all if the estate is worth £2.7 million or more.

The inclusion of most unused pensions within estates for IHT purposes from April 2027 could see more people losing their residence nil-rate bands.

Beneficiaries also have to pay income tax on any unused pension funds if the deceased was 75 or older when they died.

This means, from April 2027, some estates are facing a triple tax hit, when combining IHT and income tax on pensions, plus the loss of the residence nil-rate band.

According to calculations by insurance firm NFU Mutual, some estates may have an effective 91% tax charge on inherited unused pensions.

Adam Cole, retirement specialist at wealth management firm Quilter, said: “The prospect of some families facing an effective tax rate of over 90% on inherited pension wealth highlights just how significant the inheritance tax changes coming in from April 2027 will be.

“While these are quite extreme scenarios, many more families will find pensions that were previously outside the inheritance tax net are now contributing to much larger tax bills.”

Source: NFU Mutual

How to lower the impact from a potential triple tax blow

Gifting

Making gifts throughout your lifetime is one of the simplest ways you can lower the value of your estate, and a potential IHT bill.

There are various gifting allowances. For example, you can give away up to £3,000 tax-free each financial year to one or more people. This is known as the annual exemption.

You can also make regular gifts to people, as long as they’re made out of income and not capital and they don’t affect your standard of living.

This is known as ‘expenditure out of income’ and can include regularly paying rent for a child or adding money into an under 18’s savings account.

There are other inheritance tax allowances, plus if you give a gift at least seven years before your death, it won’t be subject to inheritance tax – unless the gift is part of a trust.

Sean McCann, chartered financial planner at NFU Mutual, said: “Making gifts during your lifetime is one of the most effective ways of reducing inheritance tax.

“While some gifts are immediately exempt, including gifts up to £3,000 each tax year and regular gifts from income that don’t compromise your normal standard of living, most others require you to survive seven years.

“In many circumstances it will be possible to take out a life insurance in trust to meet any potential inheritance tax liability on the gift.”

Take your 25% tax-free lump sum earlier

You can withdraw as much as 25% from your pension pots as a lump sum, up to a maximum of £268,275, from age 55 currently and from 57 from April 2028.

The advantage of doing this earlier is that it reduces your capital and the size of your estate.

However, there are drawbacks to taking the lump sum early, namely that the size of your pot will become smaller and there is less in there to continue growing.

Consider an annuity

Buying an annuity could be another option to lower the value of your estate.

An annuity is an insurance product which offers you a regular payment for a specific period of time in exchange for a lump sum of cash.

By buying one, you’re taking capital out of your estate and potentially lowering an eventual IHT bill for your loved ones.

Annuity rates have increased in recent years, making them a more attractive proposition. Sales of annuities have increased by 7.8% from 82,061 in 2023/24 to 88,430 in 2024/25, according to the Financial Conduct Authority.

Ed Wood, financial planning director at wealth manager Rathbones, said: “We would not advocate annuity purchases simply to avoid future inheritance tax, but the relative merits of annuity vs drawdown have slightly changed. For anyone who had previously ruled this out, it may be worth a second look.”

While most people would welcome higher wages, one in six (16%) have hesitated over or refused a pay rise, bonus or promotion because they were concerned they could lose out financially, according to research by Standard Life. This includes 5% who have turned an opportunity down altogether.

This is due to frozen income tax thresholds, which last increased in England, Wales and Northern Ireland five years ago and aren't set to rise until at least April 2031. The freeze is pushing people into higher tax brackets at a faster rate than if the thresholds had kept pace with inflation, which is known as fiscal drag.

The tax-free personal allowance would be £16,072 in 2026/27 had it kept pace with inflation – £3,502 higher than its current £12,570 level, Standard Life said.

The higher-rate threshold would be £64,274, rather than £50,270.

Based on this, the frozen personal allowance adds £700.36 to the annual income tax bill of a basic rate taxpayer who uses the allowance in full, Standard Life said.

It is not just higher taxes that are worrying people – they may also lose valuable tax allowances as their pay rises.

The analysis found that a fifth say paying a higher rate of income tax could make them consider turning down a pay rise, while 7% cite the risk of losing other financial support or allowances and 5% point to losing childcare support.

Neil Jones, tax and estate planning specialist at Standard Life , said: “A pay rise, promotion or bonus should be something to celebrate, so it’s concerning that some people are thinking twice because they’re worried they could end up worse off.

"It’s understandable that people want to protect valuable allowances and manage how much tax they pay, but turning down additional income without fully understanding your options could mean missing out unnecessarily.”

The risks of a pay rise

A pay rise is a good sign that your career is progressing but as you earn more, you could end up having to give up valuable tax benefits.

For example, parents could be taxed on Child Benefit payments or lose them altogether once one person in the household earns more than £60,000 under the High Income Child Benefit Charge. Under this tax, HMRC takes 1% of the total Child Benefit received for every £200 of income between £60,000 and £80,000. The money is fully clawed back at £80,000.

Basic rate taxpayers get a £1,000 per year personal savings allowance but this is reduced to £500 per year for higher earners. Additional rate taxpayers don't get a personal savings allowance.

There are more allowances lost once you earn above £100,000.

For instance, you lose eligibility for tax-free childcare once you earn above £100,000.

Plus, for every £2 you earn over £100,000, you lose £1 of your standard £12,570 personal allowance, dropping to zero once your income reaches £125,140.

This creates an effective 60% tax rate on taxable income between £100,000 and £125,140.

How to cut your income tax bill

There are several tax-saving strategies to consider before rejecting a pay rise.

The first recommendation is to increase pension contributions.

If your employer offers salary sacrifice, increasing pension contributions can reduce your taxable income while putting more into your pension.

Jones said: "This can be particularly useful if a pay rise takes you into a higher tax band or across another important income threshold. You may also pay less National Insurance (NI) than if you took the additional salary as cash."

The rules around pension salary sacrifice are due to change from April 2029 with a £2,000 cap being introduced on NI relief.

Pension contributions also benefit from tax relief. Basic rate taxpayers effectively receive 20% tax relief, while higher and additional rate taxpayers can qualify for relief at 40% and 45%. Depending on how contributions are made, the additional relief may need to be claimed from HMRC, so it’s worth checking you’re receiving what you’re entitled to.

Beyond pensions, you could also reduce your taxable income by making use of company benefits such as gym membership or a car scheme that may be available to fund through salary sacrifice.

Charitable donations can also reduce your taxable income and it may be worth changing the timing of how or when you receive a bonus.

Eamonn Prendergast, chartered financial adviser at Palantir Financial Planning, said: “The answer is planning, not earning less.

“When workers genuinely consider refusing career progression because of tax, policymakers should be asking whether the tax system itself has become part of the problem.”

Quarterly revenue was $96.2 billion, 4.4% above the $92.2 billion analysts polled by London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) had forecast and representing a 106% year-on-year increase.

“Nvidia’s (NASDAQ:NVDA) results show that the artificial intelligence (AI) boom is not running out of demand,” said Lale Akoner, global market strategist at investment platform eToro. “The constraint is increasingly the industry’s ability to supply and finance the infrastructure required.”

The results sent Nvidia’s share price surging in after-hours trading. As of 9.45am BST on 27 August the shares had risen around 7.5% from the previous day’s close.

“AI has reached its inflection point,” said Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia. “It’s doing useful work. Its tokens are productive and profitable.”

Nvidia’s results in detail

There were more positives for investors throughout Nvidia’s results.

Revenue for the Data Center division – the largest and most closely-watched of Nvidia’s business arms as it contains all of the AI hardware elements – beat expectations at $89 billion, up 117% year-on-year.

Nvidia’s gross margin increased from 72.5% a year ago to 75.0% in the latest quarter.

“Nvidia remains the main toll collector on big tech’s enormous AI budgets, capturing a large share of each new round of infrastructure spending,” said eToro’s Akoner.

Nvidia also issued Q3 revenue guidance of $108 billion (plus or minus 2%) – higher than the $105.1 billion that LSEG’s poll had projected.

“Blackwell Ultra drove the quarter, while Vera Rubin is already entering production,” said Akoner. “This smooth handover suggests the AI hardware upgrade cycle is accelerating without the pause some investors feared.”

How did other stocks respond to Nvidia’s results?

While growing demand for Nvidia’s products is a positive for the AI boom in general, it could be seen as a headwind for the companies that are reliant on buying them.

Alphabet fell 0.4% overnight, while Meta Platforms and Amazon both fell around 0.2%.

These are not large shifts, and could be due to other factors besides Nvidia’s results. But many are starting to question whether the so-called hyperscalers will ever recoup the hundreds of billions of dollars they are pouring into AI infrastructure.

“Once the initial excitement settles, questions are likely to resurface about the durability of this boom in revenues,” said Susannah Streeter, chief investment strategist at wealth manager Wealth Club. “It’s becoming less about whether Nvidia can keep climbing the AI mountain, and more about how long it can sustain this extraordinary pace of ascent and whether the vast sums being poured into AI infrastructure will ultimately deliver the returns needed to justify the colossal investment.’’

Higher costs for memory chips could also become a headwind for Nvidia in due course, according to Akoner.

“Rising memory costs are expected to push gross margins down from 75% to 71%-72%,” she said. “Nvidia’s ability to raise prices should help margins recover, showing considerable pricing power, but it cannot escape supply pressures entirely.”

The theory goes that value stocks – those trading at a lower price relative to their fundamentals than others – ought to outperform the rest of the market over the long term.

That’s not how it’s playing out. In the 10 years to 31 July 2026, the MSCI World Value Index generated an annualised return of 11.0%, compared to 13.3% for the MSCI World Index. The former index is based on the latter, with a tilt towards value stocks.

Momentum has been a more dominant investing factor during that time. The MSCI World Momentum Index has outperformed the main index over the last 10 years, with an annualised return of 15.2% during that time.

The rise of momentum investing was acknowledged in July 2026 by veteran value investor Terry Smith, CEO and chief investment officer of investment management company Fundsmith, when he told Fundsmith Equity Fund shareholders he would start paying more attention to the momentum factor when selecting investments.

“Periods of market exuberance can be particularly testing for valuation-driven investors,” said Cedric Jacque, investment manager at wealth manager Lloyd Capital. “Today, the combination of the artificial intelligence (AI) investment boom, strong momentum and elevated valuations has clear echoes of previous late-cycle markets.”

Why is value investing struggling?

There are two main reasons why value investing has trailed the returns of alternative strategies in recent years, though the two are interrelated.

The first is the rise of passive investing. According to data from investment research company Morningstar, passive funds’ share of the total investment fund market has risen from 12.4% in January 2008 to 46.4% in July 2026.

Most passive funds are market-cap weighted, meaning that the largest companies form the largest part of the fund. When investors buy index funds, they are therefore putting most of their investment into the largest companies in the index. In other words, the more popular passive investing becomes, the more money pours into the world’s biggest companies, pushing their share prices higher regardless of any change in their fundamentals. Indeed, many of their buyers are likely not looking at their fundamentals, but simply buying an index fund.

The rise of passive funds has coincided with an era during which technology stocks have ballooned in value. Developments like cloud computing, the proliferation of smartphones and, more recently, the AI boom have concentrated much of the market’s growth into tech stocks.

Tech is a tricky sector for value investors, because it tends to look far more at the future than the past or present. As of 21 August, software company Palantir Technologies traded at over 150 times its trailing earnings and 112 times its forecast earnings; the equivalent figures for Tesla are around 336 and 185 respectively. Tech investors price in expectations of rapid future growth that make the sector effectively off-limits for value-focused investors.

Terry Smith highlighted the convergence between these two phenomena in his shareholder letter, ascribing much of his fund’s underperformance to “a market which is dominated by so-called passive or index funds… and the boom surrounding AI which have combined to produce a market dominated by momentum rather than any fundamental factors like profitability, returns on capital and growth”.

Does value investing still work?

Smith hasn’t abandoned value investing outright, but he identified a need to “take more account of momentum… in our investment decisions”.

That shift has drawn criticism, though, with some arguing the current environment is precisely where it is most important to adhere to value investing’s principles.

“We agree with [Smith] that a market driven by passive flows and momentum can become increasingly distorted, that momentum sits at levels last seen in 1999, and that this will end badly,” said Lloyd Capital’s Jacque. “Where we part ways is on the remedy.

“We believe that becoming more of a crowd follower, and setting aside time-tested investment principles, is not a solution we can get behind,” Jacque continued. “We continue to believe that disciplined, bottom-up value investing, with a focus on earning power, is the right way to compound capital over the long term.”

Jacque argued that the passive investment boom isn’t a threat to patient value-driven investors, but rather creates an opportunity.

“Passive investing and index flows should increasingly expand the pool and the magnitude of the mispricing and therefore lead investment opportunities for the patient long-term shareholders,” he said. “We are thrilled about that.”

The move strengthened the yen at the start of August, but it has since given back roughly half of its post-intervention gain. Currency analysts warn the fundamental drivers of a weak yen, especially a yield gap between Japan (where rates are 1%) and the US (where rates are over 3.5%), have not gone away.

Scott Bessent knows a thing or two about currency trading, says The Guardian. He was part of the George Soros team in 1992 that made a billion dollars by forcing the pound off the European Exchange-Rate Mechanism. His intervention to stabilise the yen wasn't an act of charity. Japan is a “cash spigot”, with the cheap yen funding a global “carry trade” that helps prop up US technology shares.

If the yen's slide continues, then Japan might be forced to respond with “aggressive” interest-rate rises. That could quickly unwind the carry trade and trigger a Wall Street rout, as happened two years ago when a surprise Japanese rate rise sent global markets tumbling.

Don't worry, the risk of a “disorderly” unwind “seems low”, Masayuki Nakajima of Mizuho Bank tells Katie Martin in the Financial Times. The danger of higher Japanese rates is now “extremely well understood” by traders, who have made appropriate preparations. Rather than a snap yen rally, “all the ingredients are in place” for the carry trade to continue and yen selling pressure to persist. “It is increasingly clear that the market is in the mood for a fight” with the US Treasury.

What does Scott Bessent’s intervention mean for the global economy?

The “US currency intervention was not only ineffective, but counterproductive”, says George Saravelos of Deutsche Bank. Washington has been encouraging Tokyo to tap an emergency Federal Reserve dollar facility, inadvertently sending a signal that “it is not comfortable” with the “direct US Treasury sales” that Tokyo usually uses to prop up the yen.

If Scott Bessent's yen “ruse” was designed to keep US borrowing costs under control, then it has failed, agrees Simon Nixon on Substack. Washington's use of “unorthodox” tools, including selling euros rather than dollars to fund the yen intervention, has only “deepened the anxiety it was meant to soothe”. Bond traders sniff out hesitation like sharks detect blood in the water.

The spike in government debt isn't only affecting America. Japan's own ten-year yield hit a 30-year high on Monday, while France's has topped 4% for the first time since 2008, potentially pushing the country closer to the brink of a “debt crisis”.

This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

German earnings on the DAX index rose 11% year on year, the best showing “in at least ten quarters”, according to Deutsche Bank analysts. The country's carmakers remain in poor health, but that was more than offset by a superb showing from industrial and chemical firms. The wider Stoxx 600 did even better, recording year-on-year earnings growth of 23%.

European stocks have turned in their “best earnings season in nearly four years”, say Sagarika Jaisinghani and Alice Atkins on Bloomberg. Miners and industrials are booming. The continent's small technology sector is outperforming the US giants, led by Dutch chip specialist ASML, whose shares have risen 57% this year. Foreign investors are piling in, with European stocks attracting the second-strongest inflows in a decade so far this year. Given the challenging backdrop, the “resilience” of the continent's corporations is deeply reassuring.

European stock markets have long been overshadowed by Wall Street and some of the racier Asian markets, says Joseph Wilkins on CNBC. Goldman Sachs analysts argue that many of the things investors think they know about Europe are “myths”. Chinese competition, for example, isn't an existential challenge, because carmakers represent just 1% of the continent's market capitalisation. “Since 2022, European banks have considerably outperformed the Magnificent Seven.” And with anxiety growing about AI exposure, the old continent offers an obvious “hedge”.

Eurosclerosis continues for European stocks

US equity valuations are “on the nuttier side of bonkers”, but that doesn't necessarily make European stocks good value, says Stuart Kirk in the Financial Times. The Euro Stoxx 50 index of eurozone blue-chips has managed a fairly boring annualised return of 11.1% over the past decade. True, ASML is a “world-class firm”, but the performance of the continent's other industrials and banks is underwhelming when compared with US peers. “Europe's 25% price/earnings discount to US shares is not deep enough.”

European growth remains sclerotic, says James Carter for National Review. The EU's GDP per capita is just half that of the US, down from 76.5% in 2008. Contrary to popular belief, Europeans work just as much as Americans; indeed, employed Europeans average longer working weeks than their US counterparts. The real issue is sluggish productivity growth.

The danger of an energy shock has not gone away either. European natural gas prices have been trading above €60/MWh, levels not seen since the tail end of the 2022-2023 energy crisis. The continent's gas storage is the lowest it has been for this time of year since at least 2009.

This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

The high-profile collapse of London Capital & Finance in 2019 – where 11,600 bondholders lost an estimated £237 million – prompted the FCA to ban the marketing of mini-bonds to retail investors in 2021.

They can now only be sold to high-net worth and sophisticated investors who can handle more risk in their investment portfolio.

But the regulator remains concerned after the July failure of Woodville Consultants, a litigation funder that raised capital from retail investors through unregulated loan notes.

The FCA is now warning consumers about the risks of investing in loan notes and mini-bonds issued by unregulated companies, after it said it continues to see people lose money in these high-risk investments.

What is a mini bond?

A mini bond usually involves lending money to a company for a set period in return for interest.

Mini bonds were popular pre-pandemic when savings and interest rates were at record lows.

The rate of return is often high - even at double digits - to tempt investors and reflect the risk. But they are not regulated so you can’t get any recourse from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme or Financial Ombudsman Service if something goes wrong.

Ultimately, if the company fails, consumers could lose every penny.

Nouran Moustafa, practice principal for Roxton Wealth, said her starting point for an ordinary retail client with mini bonds is a very simple 'no'.

She said: “The word ‘bond’ sounds reassuring, but some of these investments are anything but. You can be lending to one unregulated company, with little liquidity, limited diversification and the possibility of losing every penny if that business fails.”

Moustafa feels they could “potentially” have a place, but if so “only for a very small minority of sophisticated investors who fully understand the structure" and who aren't relying on that money for the future.

“My rule is simple: if losing 100% of that investment would materially change your life, you should not be anywhere near it," said Moustafa. “No yield is worth destroying your financial plan.”

What is the latest mini bond warning about?

Despite promotions of mini bonds to mainstream investors being banned since January 2021, the FCA said consumers may still come across adverts for loan notes and mini bonds in everyday places including social media, online adverts or websites promoting high fixed returns.

The adverts can look simple and safe but may be scams, said the FCA.

Lucy Castledine, director of consumer investments at the FCA, said: “Big, fixed returns are a warning sign, not a guarantee. Loan notes, mini-bonds and other speculative illiquid securities are high-risk investments and are not suitable for most people.

“Ordinary retail investors should only invest through regulated firms because if they invest through an unauthorised firm, they may have little or no protection if things go wrong. We are working hard to prevent harm, but consumers should still stop and check before investing.”

Anita Wright, chartered financial planner for Ribble Wealth Management said mini bonds can be seductive but investors should ask why the offer reached them.

She said: “Credit this good doesn't need retail money, banks price it for a living, and private credit funds fight over the scraps. When the capital is raised instead from savers through a commissioned introducer, every desk with a credit team has already looked and walked away.

“You are not early. You are last,” Wright said, adding that the only people who know the business they are lending to and can afford to write off the investment completely should consider buying one.

“Even then the deal is lopsided,” she continued. “If the business fails you lose like a shareholder, if it thrives you still only get your interest.”

The Iran conflict and cost of living crisis have pushed up energy bills in recent months with Ofgem's price cap remaining high.

Rooftop solar panels are often highlighted as one way of going green and potentially reducing your electricity bills.

But not everyone can afford the upfront cost and many don’t have the roof space or permission to install them.

There will be another option from 27 August though when government changes to energy power regulations go live and shops such as supermarkets and hardware stores including B&Q and Lidl will be allowed to sell plug-in solar panels.

These can be installed on balconies or in gardens to capture energy from the sun.

What is a plug-in solar panel?

A plug-in solar panel is a smaller and less powerful version than a rooftop one.

They are popular in Europe but couldn't be used in the UK until a change in regulations.

Rather than attaching to your roof, you can find a common sunny spot at your home such as a balcony or garden and connect it to your mains via a cable that plugs straight into a typical socket.

The idea is that people in flats or who can’t install panels on their roof such as renters or leaseholders can still try to reduce their energy bills and go solar.

Similar to a rooftop panel, electricity is generated from sunlight.

But there are differences as the plug-in panels can't store power (with the rooftop versions, you can store the power in a special home battery), meaning you need to be home to actually use it as it is being generated.

How much could you save with a plug-in solar panel?

The government estimates that the panels could save households between £70 and £110 on energy per year.

There are other costs though. You will need to purchase the kit, which is estimated to cost between £400 and £600. You will also need a professional tradesperson to install it.

It may therefore take a few years to breakeven.

The savings will ultimately depend on your own energy usage but anything plugged in will use energy from the panel first before drawing it from the National Grid and your main bill.

Is a plug-in solar panel worth it?

The cost of installing a rooftop solar panel starts from £6,000, according to the Energy Saving Trust so a plug-in panel is cheaper to start with.

But there is less capacity for energy savings.

The maximum power of the plug-in panels has been capped at 800 watts.

The website Money Saving Expert suggests that’s the equivalent of two kilowatt hours of electricity per day, while the average UK household uses 7.4kWh.

Another issue is that the panels don’t store energy, so it is best to make sure they are being used while you are at home so you can benefit from the power being generated.

Renters and leaseholders may also need to get permission to install a plug-in panel depending what their rental or leasehold agreements say.

Martyn Fowler, founder of green energy supplier Elite Renewables, said: “The value is highest when you use the electricity as it is being generated. If the system produces a unit of electricity and you consume that unit in the house, you have avoided buying one from your supplier.

“Homes with a steady daytime load will benefit most. Someone working from home is likely to use more of the generation than a property that sits empty all day.”

Orientation matters as well.

Fowler added: “A panel mounted vertically on a balcony will generate less over the year than the same panel at a good angle facing south.

“Plug-in solar is a useful entry point into solar. It will not transform your energy bill, but it can be a low-cost way to reduce grid use and start generating some of your own power.”

• UK Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rose by 2.9% in the 12 months to July 2026.
• CPI inflation rose by 2.6% in the 12 months to June 2026, down from 2.8% in May and April 2026.
• Ratesetters at the Bank of England will be watching the July data closely to inform their next decision on UK interest rates.

| UK inflation forecast | What is inflation? | When will interest rates fall further? | CPI release dates | MPC meeting dates |

The government-backed savings bank will increase the prize fund rate from 3.80% to 4.35% from the September draw.

NS&I says there will be more than 308,000 extra prizes up for grabs, including 12 additional £100,000 prizes, 27 more £50,000 prizes and an extra 51 £25,000 prizes.

There will also be over 2.3 million £100 prizes in total and the overall monthly pot will rise by £63 million to more than £497 million.

NS&I is also increasing the odds of winning from September, from 22,000 to one to 21,000 to one. The odds were also raised in July.

Caitlyn Eastell, personal finance analyst at data firm Moneyfactscompare, said: “[Premium Bonds] may be particularly appealing to savers who have already used their ISA allowance or are likely to breach their personal savings allowance.

“However, despite the improved odds, they are a game of chance and the 4.35% shouldn’t be mistaken for a headline rate.”

Eastell added: “The best easy access ISAs pay over 4.5% and returns could be even higher if [savers are] willing to lock away their cash.”

Source: NS&I

NS&I boosts rates on savings accounts

In addition to increasing the Premium Bonds prize fund rate and odds of winning, NS&I is also increasing interest rates on 10 savings accounts from today (18 August).

NS&I is boosting rates on its easy-access Direct Saver and Income Bonds savings accounts.

The Direct Saver’s rate is increasing from 3.45% gross/AER to 3.75% gross/AER while the Income Bonds savings account’s rate is rising from 3.4% gross/3.45% AER to 3.69% gross/3.75% AER.

Interest is paid yearly on the Direct Saver. You can hold a minimum of £1 and maximum of £2 million in the account.

Interest is paid monthly on the Income Bonds account. You need a larger £500 to open it and can hold a maximum of £1 million.

NS&I is also hiking rates on its one, two, three and five-year fixed-rate Guaranteed Growth and Guaranteed Income British Savings Bonds.

Rates are increasing by between 0.09 and 0.15 percentage points.

Source: NS&I

Are the savings accounts worth it?

If you like the idea of your money being 100% backed by the Treasury, the Direct Saver and Income Bonds could be more appealing now their rates have increased.

Money in most savings accounts is protected under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) in case your provider collapses, but only up to £120,000.

However, even with your money being backed by the Treasury through the Direct Saver and Income Bonds, you can get more competitive rates via other easy-access accounts on the market currently.

Santander’s Edge Saver account is paying 6% interest, if you open a Santander Edge or Santander Edge Explorer current account. The accounts come with respective monthly fees of £3 and £17.

If you don’t want to pay a monthly current account fee, you could also put your money in a cahoot Sunny Day Saver and get 5% on balances up to £3,000, or the Chase Saver has an interest rate of 4.5% on balances up to £3 million.

NS&I’s changes to their fixed-rate British Savings Bonds have made them best buys, correct at the time of writing.

Based on MoneyWeek analysis of Moneyfacts data, the one, two, three and five-year bonds are all in the top 10 for their respective terms, however, the top rates on the market are currently paying up to 5%.

Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at investment platform AJ Bell, said: “Given that this is the most popular term to fix your savings over, [NS&I is] clearly hoping to persuade rate-chasers to make a small compromise in order to secure a rate that’s 100% backed by the Treasury.

“There are better deals on offer elsewhere – especially if you are fixing for longer – so if the rate is the most important thing to you, you can find a more rewarding home for your money.

“However, getting so close to the most competitive deals could be enough to tempt some savers into the NS&I fold.”

The higher rates are available if you lock your money away to grow for a fixed amount of time, with no withdrawals allowed.

For the ISA products, any interest earned during the term will be tax-free.

Richard Stocker, Nationwide’s head of savings, said: “We’re pleased to launch new higher rates on our fixed rate cash ISAs and bonds, while continuing to ensure customers can access the same rates whether they open their account online or in branch.

“With the UK’s largest branch network, backed by our Branch Promise, we’re committed to ensuring customers who prefer face-to-face service aren’t disadvantaged. Many of our branch-accessible products are among the highest-paying available from a major high street provider, reflecting our commitment to combining choice, value and support for savers.”

The improved interest rates make the accounts some of the most attractive among major high street savings providers, but they are not the highest available on the market.

What are the new rates?

Interest rates for Nationwide’s new fixed-term ISAs range from 4.4% to 4.7% depending on the amount of time you choose to lock your savings away for.

As the account is locked for a fixed-term you cannot access it whenever you like without paying a penalty.

If you make any withdrawals from the account, you will need to pay an early access charge equivalent to between 60 and 300 days’ interest depending on the term of your ISA. Your ISA will also be closed.

There is a 14-day grace period after opening the account where you can withdraw your cash without paying a penalty.

You must be a UK resident aged 18 or over to open one of these accounts. Any interest you earn from cash held in an ISA is entirely tax-free.

The table below shows the new fixed-rate ISAs and their interest rates:

Source: Nationwide, 14 August

The new interest rates for non-ISA accounts are slightly lower than the new rates for the ISA products.

These accounts can be opened by UK residents aged 16 and over and no withdrawals are allowed at all 14 days after opening the account.

A table showing a full list of the new rates can be found below:

Source: Nationwide, 14 August

Customers can access the exact same rates whether they open the accounts in-branch or online.

Are Nationwide’s new savings accounts any good?

Nationwide’s new, higher rates on fixed-term accounts are decent, but are still not the best on the market.

The top 4.7% rate on the five year fixed-rate ISA is just shy of the market-leading rate of 4.85% from Leek Building Society and Vida Savings.

This is the case for all of the new ISA accounts, which each offer a good interest rate, but none are the absolute best in the market.

As for the non-ISA savings accounts, there is a much bigger gap between Nationwide's rates and the market leaders.

The table below shows Nationwide’s new rates compared to the market leaders.

Source: Moneyfactscompare.co.uk, 14 August. Calculations based on £25,000 lump sum investment.

Nationwide customers may be happy to miss out on a slightly lower interest rate considering other perks offered by the building society – for example, the ability to visit bank branches.

Nationwide has promised not to close any more branches until at least the start of 2030, in contrast to the prevailing trend of branch closures.

Nationwide has also offered a £100 Fairer Share bonus to millions of eligible customers each year since 2023.

Rachel Springall, finance expert at Moneyfacts, said: “While they might not be market-leading rates overall, savers who would prefer to place their cash in a fixed account over the longer term, with a provider that offers an in-branch service, will find them competitively priced against other high street brands.

“Customers who flock to Nationwide can benefit from in-branch face-to-face support, which is ideal for those who may have accessibility issues, plus, its current account range is well worth considering due to the variety of cost-saving add-ons. When it comes to finding the best savings accounts, it’s always important to shop around and keep any nest egg as tax-efficient as possible, such as by using an ISA.”

The regulator Ofwat has provisionally approved a package of funding to increase capacity, provide cleaner drinking water and upgrade treatment sites.

However, it means bills are set to rise by up to £43 a year between 2027 and 2030 for many customers in England and Wales.

The hikes are not yet confirmed and are going through a consultation phase, before any final approval is made in December.

The rises come in addition to previously approved increases to upgrade the network between 2025 and 2030.

Helen Campbell, executive director for delivery at Ofwat, said: “We will track performance to ensure companies are delivering the expected improvements for customers and the environment. If they don’t, expenditure can be clawed back.”

Which water firms are increasing bills?

Customers of the following five water firms are set to see their bills rise over the three-year period:

Source: Ofwat

Water firms say they need to increase customers’ bills to replace pipes and reduce leaks across the network, provide water to more people and businesses and because of heavier rainfall which can lead to more flooding and loss of water from storm overflows.

However, recent rises have been met with criticism from households and campaigners following water supply issues and pollution in rivers and seas.

Kierra Box, water campaigner at environmental group Friends of the Earth, said: “Our rivers and seas are chock full of filthy sewage and chemicals, which have seen next to no improvement despite recent bill hikes.

“Now ordinary people are being asked to foot the bill once again to pay for decades of water company inaction on upgrading our crumbling water infrastructure. It’s daylight robbery.”

Customers with Anglian Water, Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water, Hafren Dyfrdwy, Northumbrian Water, South West Water, United Utilities, Yorkshire Water and SES Water will face no further bill rises between 2027 and 2030.

How you can cut your water bill

It’s worth regularly checking your water bill and comparing it to earlier bills to see if there has been a spike.

If there has been, you might have a water leak in your home that means you’re using a lot more than you usually do and will need to get fixed.

You could also switch to a water meter which charges you based on your actual usage rather than the rateable value of your home. Most homes can have a water meter installed for free.

However, a water meter can see your bill rise as well as fall. The Consumer Council for Water (CCW), which represents water and sewerage customers, has a calculator you can use to find out if you might save money with a meter.

Typically, single-person households or homes with a high rateable value tend to benefit the most.

You might also be eligible for the WaterSure scheme which caps your water bill.

You’ll need to have a water meter, be on certain benefits such as Universal Credit or Pension Credit and have a medical condition that means you have to use extra water or have a large number of people living in your household.

Plenty of water firms offer customers free or cheap water-saving gadgets such as leak-detecting strips and water-efficient shower heads too.

Advice website Save Water Save Money has a tool on its website where you can enter your postcode and find out what gadgets you’re eligible for.

There are smaller practical steps you can take to save water around your home, such as making sure your dishwasher is full when using it and taking shorter showers.

Financial consumer site Boring Money’s latest investment trust report shows that investment trust ownership among UK investors has fallen to its lowest level since the company started tracking adoption in 2021 – falling from 12% to 9% in the last year.

The report, based on four surveys (the largest of which included 6,000 nationally representative UK adults) reveals a stark fall in the percentage of 35-54 year-olds owning investment trusts, where adoption fell from 12% to 7% over the last six years.

“[US activist hedge fund] Saba created upheaval in the industry and highlighted the importance of the retail investor vote,” said Holly Mackay, CEO of Boring Money. “This coupled with declining levels of adoption is a real call to action for boards [of investment trusts] to engage with the customers of tomorrow, and demonstrate the role that trusts have to play in an investor’s portfolio.”

A lower percentage of UK investors holding investment trusts doesn’t necessarily mean they’ve become less popular in absolute terms though, given there are now more UK investors than ever before.

But Boring Money also noted a decline in the proportion of assets held in investment trusts on individual investment platforms, indicating ownership is declining in absolute terms too.

Why is investment trust ownership declining?

Investors appear to be favouring simpler and often cheaper vehicles over investment trusts.

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have surged in popularity recently: over the last six years, ETF ownership has nearly quadrupled from 5% to almost 20%.

“ETFs feel easier for people to compute,” said Mackay. “They have become synonymous with cheap and easy. Investment trusts are still thought to be difficult and old-fashioned.

“Trusts are trying to compete with 60 page PDFs and complex explainers and this misses a key point about getting through to retail investors,” she continued. “Beyond the hobbyists, most people want to spend as little time on this as possible. It’s about delivering key messages succinctly and with limited space.”

Boring Money’s research suggests that 45% of today’s investment trust holders have held their investment trusts for 10 years or more, compared to 18% of ETF holders, and that eight times as many investors bought ETFs for the first time in the last year compared to investment trusts.

“To try to capture some of the growth going to ETF providers, investment trusts have more to do to communicate their benefits to a broader investor base which has higher expectations for simple, compelling messaging and competitive price points,” Mackay said.

How is the investment trust industry responding?

The investment trust industry is moving to address this communication deficit.

“Investment trusts have fantastic benefits for investors of all ages, but we need to make sure that more people are aware of them,” said Nick Britton, research director at the Association of Investment Companies (AIC), an industry body representing UK investment trusts.

The AIC is launching a campaign aimed at raising awareness of investment trusts among investors aged 25-44. This is an interesting demographic to target: Boring Money noted that investment trust ownership among under-35s has increased from 7% to 9% since 2021, in contrast to the age group immediately above it, where adoption fell

“Investment trusts are particularly suitable for younger investors because their investment horizon is long and they can back exciting companies like SpaceX at an early stage of their development,” said Britton. “They can also use gearing [borrowing] to enhance returns and offer access to many parts of the market that other kinds of funds can’t reach.”

The government has revealed the first locations where outdated electricity infrastructure will be upgraded, with households living close to these projects eligible for money off their bills.

The scheme is due to start in the first half of 2027, with most eligible households getting an automatic discount on their electricity bill every six months via their electricity supplier.

It is understood up to 50p a year will be added to all energy bills to fund the initiative.

Michael Shanks, energy minister, said: “Upgrading Britain’s electricity grid is a vital part of how we deliver secure, homegrown energy and unlock economic growth across the country.

“It is a moment of national renewal – upgrading what was built largely in the 1960s for the modern age to bring down electricity bills for households across the country.

“It’s vital we build again as a country and we are determined those communities which host pylons should benefit, which is why we’re bringing down the energy bills of those hosting this vital national infrastructure.”

Who is eligible for the discount?

Households who live within 500 metres of the new or upgraded electricity infrastructure, such as pylons and power lines, will be eligible for the Bill Discount Scheme.

The government expects between 120,000 and 160,000 homes to receive a discount through the scheme over the next 10 years.

However, the locations where the updates will be carried out are being released in waves. The first 43 locations where these upgrades are planned to take place have now been released by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ).

England

• Bramford to Twinstead – East Anglia
• Norwich to Tilbury – East Anglia, and East of England
• Eastern Green Link 3 - converter station – East of England
• Eastern Green Link 4 - converter station – East of England
• Sea Link - converter station – East Anglia
• Grimsby to Walpole – Yorkshire and the Humber, and East of England
• North Humber to High Marnham – Midlands
• Brinsworth to High Marnham – Yorkshire and the Humber, and the Midlands
• Chesterfield to Willington – Midlands
• North London Reinforcement – London/ South of England

Scotland

• Banniskirk Hub 400 kV substation and HVDC converter station – North Scotland
• Cambushinnie 400 kV substation – North, and central Scotland
• Fort Augustus Substation 400 kV Upgrade – North Scotland
• Spittal - Loch Buidhe - Beauly 400 kV overhead line – North and North West Scotland
• Beauly - Peterhead 400 kV overhead line – North, and North East Scotland
• Carnaig 400 kV substation – North Scotland
• Hurlie 400 kV Substation – North East Scotland
• Kintore - Tealing 400 kV overhead line – North East Scotland
• New Fanellan 400 kV substation and Converter Station – North Scotland
• Creag Dhubh – Dalmally 275 kV overhead line – West Scotland
• Edinbane substation – West Scotland
• Broadford substation – West Scotland
• Skye 132 kV overhead line reinforcement – West Scotland
• Netherton Hub – North East Scotland
• Tealing - Westfield 400 kV overhead line – Central, and East Scotland
• Bingally 400 kV Substation – North Scotland
• Greens (New Deer 2) 400 kV substation – North East Scotland
• Lewis Hub – West Scotland
• Emmock 400 kV Substation – North East Scotland
• Crarae 275 kV Substation – West Scotland
• Coalburn Substation – Central Scotland
• Mark Hill Substation– South West Scotland
• Stranoch OHL and Substation – South West Scotland
• Chirmorie – South West Scotland
• Branxton Substation – South East Scotland
• Sanquhar Substation- South Scotland
• Denny to Wishaw 400 kV Reinforcement (DWNO) – Central Scotland, and South Scotland
• Eastern Subsea HVDC Link from Westfield to South Humber (TGDC) (EGL4) – East of Scotland
• Kincardine North – Tealing 400 kV Substation (TKUP) – East of Scotland
• Kincardine North 400 kV Substation (LWUP) – East of Scotland
• Kincardine North – Wishaw 400 kV Reinforcement (DWUP) – Central Scotland and East of Scotland
• Gala North – Harker Area 400 kV (CMN4) – Scottish Borders

Wales

• Pentir to Trawsfynydd – North Wales

If you live within 500 metres of the above locations, you may start receiving a discount on your energy bills from early 2027.

Some of the 43 projects in this first wave have not yet received planning consent or are still going through an appeals process though. Households will only qualify for the Bill Discount Scheme after construction has started on them.

How will the discounts be applied?

Most qualifying households will automatically receive the discount.

Some households, such as those on commercial meters, may need to apply for the discount. The government or Ofgem will contact you if you need to take action.

Discounts will be applied to households’ electricity bills by their supplier every six months.

Why is the government updating the network?

The government wants to update the network as most of it was built in the 1960s.

The network is being upgraded to handle a higher capacity of energy, including from renewable energy produced by solar panels and wind farms.

The government also says upgrading the network will reduce the UK’s reliance on imported gas and lead to cheaper energy bills for consumers.

It comes as ministers look to tackle higher energy bills more broadly for households, including removing VAT on electricity bills from October which is expected to take £45 off the yearly price cap.

European-listed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) attracted flows of €47.3 billion in July, up 28.5% from €36.8 billion the previous month, according to data from investment research firm Morningstar.

Fund flows can give a broad indication of how investors feel about the market at a given point of time, though there is of course no guarantee that this will continue in future.

Among European-listed ETFs, those focusing on equity investing attracted €34.2 billion in flows during July, up from €29.9 billion in June. ETFs tracking bonds attracted €8.8 billion in July, up from €7.7 billion in June.

“Despite a softer month for US equities, money continued to flow into both global and US-focused equity [ETFs], reflecting investor conviction in the long-term artificial intelligence and technology-led growth story,” said Jose Garcia-Zarate, senior principal at Morningstar. “Investors largely treated market weakness as a buying opportunity, continuing to allocate capital to growth-oriented exposures.”

While ETF flows remained strong in aggregate, there was some divergence between the allocations towards different styles of fund.

The Europe-listed ETF sectors that saw the biggest inflows and outflows

Blend equity ETFs (those holding a combination of value and growth stocks) saw some of the largest inflows among Europe-listed equity ETFs during July, according to Morningstar’s analysis.

Global large cap blend equity ETFs attracted €10.1 billion in flows during the month, followed by US large cap blend equity at €8.6 billion.

While ETFs that contained a blend of US large- and small-caps saw the largest flows, their counterparts that focused on either growth or value saw divergent flows. ETFs targeting US large cap growth stocks were among those that saw the largest outflows (€1.4 billion worth), but US large cap value ETFs saw outflows of €117 million.

^{Source: Morningstar Direct. Data as of 31 July 2026.}

“Interestingly, we saw little evidence of a meaningful rotation into defensive or value strategies during the pullback,” said Garcia-Zarate.

The ETF sectors that saw the largest outflows were global large cap value, which saw outflows of €539 million, and Europe ex-UK with €442 million in outflows.

Which Europe-listed ETFs saw the largest flows during July?

Vanguard’s FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (LON:VWRP) topped the list of ETFs seeing the largest inflows during July, with €3.3 billion flowing into the fund. iShares MSCI Japan ETF (LON:IJPN) came second, with €1.6 billion inflows.

State Street SPDR MSCI World ETF (LON:SWLD) saw the largest outflows, at €1.9 billion, followed by Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap ETF (LON:XSXG) which registered €981 million outflows.

^{Source: Morningstar Direct. Data as of 31 July 2026.}

What happened to global ETP flows in July?

The data on flows into European-listed ETFs and ETCs was consistent with the picture that global ETP flows painted.

Global flows into exchange-traded products (ETPs) – which includes ETFs and ETCs – hit a record $362.6 billion in July, according to data from asset manager BlackRock.

BlackRock’s analysis showed that flows into equity ETPs rose for the third consecutive month to $64.8 billion.

Tech-focused ETPs saw higher flows than any other sector. Flows into tech ETPs reached a record $60.5 billion in July, smashing through the previous record of $32.0 billion, set the previous month.

The data from The Investment Association (IA) – an industry body representing the UK’s investment managers – showed that retail investors allocated £12.3 billion into funds during the first six months of the year.

June’s positive fund flows marked the eighth consecutive month of net fund inflows.

While the annual totals suggest that investors were willing to invest, there is evidence that resilience and defensiveness were top of mind.

“Investors have shown resilience by staying invested in the markets, shifting their portfolios to lower-risk strategies, with bonds, diversified mixed assets and cash-like assets leading the way,” said Miranda Seath, director of market insight and fund sectors at the IA.

Fixed income strategies saw monthly inflows of £2.3 billion, the highest monthly figure since January 2021 and up 53% from £1.5 billion in May 2026. Within fixed income strategies, funds focused on government bonds saw the largest inflow, at £674 million during June.

Despite a Memorandum of Understanding between the US and Iran alleviating pressure on oil prices and calming inflation expectations for much of the month, investors allocated their money cautiously and equity funds saw net outflows of £1.1 billion. This was, however, an improvement on the £1.5 billion outflows that occurred in May.

Where were fund flows concentrated in the first half of 2026?

Across the first six months of 2026, equity funds saw total outflows of £7 billion – though, again, this marks a slowing of outflows compared to the £14.3 billion that fled the sector in the second half (H2) of 2025.

Fittingly given the volatile year that US stocks have had, net monthly flows to the North America sector fluctuated between inflows and outflows each month during H1, but it was the only IA equity sector to end the period in positive territory, with inflows of £1.7 billion.

Seath attributed this flip-flopping to investor unease and uncertainties relating to artificial intelligence (AI).

The North American Smaller Companies sector saw its first month of inflows this year during June, bringing in a net £181 million.

Half-yearly outflows from UK-focused funds fell to their lowest level since 2021 – with £3.1 billion leaving these funds in H1 2026 compared to £4.8 billion in H2 2025.

This moderation in UK equity outflows follows a strong 2025 for UK stocks, said Seath.

“Investors may be taking advantage of a more defensive market composition in the face of broader uncertainty,” she added. “The UK market has relatively high exposure to 'halo' sectors, those with heavy assets and low obsolescence, such as mining and energy, which are often viewed as more resilient during periods of uncertainty and offer a counter trade to investments in AI and tech stocks helping to diversify portfolios.”

Funds focused on Asian equities, though, saw outflows of £1.6 billion during H1. Certain Asian markets are highly exposed to the volatility of certain parts of the AI infrastructure industry.

“Emerging markets chip manufacturers have become key players in the global AI value chain, driving strong performance but also creating potential new concentration risks in markets including South Korea,” said Seath.

Did active or passive funds see the biggest fund flows in the first half of 2026?

Fund flows are a good way to see what investors are backing in the active versus passive debate. The data from H1 2026 shows passive strategies are overwhelmingly more popular.

Tracker funds saw inflows of £9.7 billion in the first half of the year – their strongest half-year since 2024.

Most of this demand came from equity tracker funds, which saw inflows of £6.8 billion.

Actively managed equity funds, by contrast, saw outflows of £13.9 billion during the first half of the year.

In bad news for sustainable investments, responsible investment funds also saw outflows of £2.7 billion across H1, with outflows from SDR-labelled funds shedding £1.9 billion.

Over the weekend, Japan's Ministry of Finance and the US Treasury confirmed they had jointly intervened in currency markets to support the yen. Japan is thought to have sold $59 billion to buy yen, with Washington staging a smaller intervention – its first in Japan since 2011 – in support.

The move sent the Japanese yen up 3.5% against the US dollar, a significant rise in foreign-exchange terms that reversed months of depreciation. Japan's own interventions had become increasingly ineffective. America brings much more potential firepower to the table.

Why is the US buying Japanese yen?

US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent has shown markets there is “a new sheriff in town”, says Katie Martin in the Financial Times. The real mystery is why Washington is getting involved at all. One explanation is simply that Donald Trump likes Japan, telling reporters “Japan's been very good to us, with the exception, of course, of Pearl Harbor”.

Self-interest, too, may be motivating Bessent. Japan's “massive sales” of dollar assets (mainly US Treasuries) are raising US borrowing costs at a time when government yields are already under pressure. His solution? “Stand behind Japan like a scary big brother” to “scare off the yen sellers.” The Japanese yen stabilised at around 157 to the dollar this week, stronger than the 163 level prior to the intervention.

The operation is likely to halt, at least temporarily, a “disruptive further depreciation” of the yen, says Brad Setser of the Council on Foreign Relations. A weak yen tends to pressure other Asian currencies lower. By making the region's exports cheaper, weak Asian currencies cut against the White House's desire for US re-industrialisation. The administration of a short, sharp shock to speculators betting against the Japanese yen might cause them to re-evaluate the trade.

Recent market “negativity” towards Japan has been overdone. The country has several important strengths, including a big current account surplus and ownership of huge tranches of overseas assets.

The one missing piece is higher interest rates. At 1%, Japanese rates are far below those in America, which causes steady selling pressure as local investors seek better yields overseas. Therein lies the rub, says Robin Brooks on Substack. Japan cannot afford to raise interest rates because of its mammoth government debt, which is equivalent to 248% of GDP. But without the support of rate hikes, this currency intervention will ultimately “fail like all previous ones”. Despite its slide, the Japanese yen is probably still overvalued. Its rout is “a symptom of a debt crisis that's getting papered over”.

This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

The fintech firm acquired a full UK banking licence in March 2026 after a four-year battle with regulators.

Since then, it has been shifting its over 13 million UK customers to its banking arm.

Many existing customers and new Revolut customers already have current accounts with Revolut’s UK bank. 

While it has been popular with users who travel regularly due to perks such as zero FX fees when spending abroad, lounge access and travel insurance, this will be the first time Revolut will offer basic current accounts.

The move is expected to shake-up the banking sector, providing competition to the major high street names and challengers like Monzo.

Nik Storonsky, chief executive officer of Revolut, said in March that securing a banking licence was a “vital step in our mission to build the world’s first truly global bank”.

Existing customers’ accounts are still being transitioned to bank accounts in tranches. Revolut is contacting them one to two weeks ahead of being fully moved across.

In an email to customers, seen by MoneyWeek, Revolut said: "Becoming a licensed bank means we’ll be able to offer more banking products and features in the future.”

Kalpana Fitzpatrick, digital editor-in-chief on Moneyweek, said: “The good news for anyone using Revolut is that being part of a bank, your money is protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and in future you could also benefit from competitive savings deals and mortgages.

"But the question is, do you want another current account? If you do not use your Revolut account much, then this will be another account you may have to manage.”

Here’s everything you need to know about what the changes mean for you.

What is changing?

Your account will switch from being an e-money account to a new current account.

Revolut customers can deposit money into the current accounts, with deposits protected under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) up to £120,000 per person.

If you have an account with travel insurance, available for premium accounts, the terms and conditions will stay the same.

However, travel insurance group policy numbers will change, which Revolut will send via email.

What is staying the same?

The account number you have with Revolut, as well as any sort codes, IBAN and BIC will stay the same when you move to a bank account.

You will be able to access transaction and statement history from before the start of the transition in March 2026.

Charges and fees for all Revolut plans will be unchanged while you can still trade in stocks and cryptocurrency via the app.

Can you close your account?

If you’re an existing Revolut customer and don’t want your account to be transitioned across to a current account, you can simply close your account via the app.

Having smashed through the record for the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history back in June, SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX) announced results for the first time as a public company on 4 August.

SpaceX’s IPO saw its shares skyrocket, gaining 19% on their first day and a further 25% over the following two sessions.

But by market close on 4 August, ahead of the earnings release, they had fallen to $125.33 – 7% below the IPO price of $135 and 44% below the $225.64 peak they reached on 16 June.

And the reaction following results exacerbated this crash-landing. The stock opened more than 10% lower on 5 August, the day after the results, despite some impressive headline figures. Increased spending seems to have spooked many investors.

“Part of a SpaceX rocket crashing into the moon this morning is probably a good metaphor for the share price performance so far,” said Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at investing and trading platform IG.

Revenue was encouraging, increasing 92% year-on-year to $7.8 billion. Analysts polled by LSEG had yielded a consensus forecast of $6.9 billion, so this represented a healthy beat – at least in theory.

“It’s so early in [SpaceX’s] life as a public company, that beating consensus carries little real weight,” said Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown. “Analysts are still trying to work out what the business should look like.”

Rather than these estimates, investors appear to have focused on the negatives, including rising costs across all segments – particularly artificial intelligence, where spending rose by $1.6 billion.

Across the business, losses narrowed to $541 million from $1 billion, and Elon Musk moved the company’s target date to achieve $1 trillion in annual revenue forward by a year, from 2031 to 2030.

The initial success of SpaceX’s IPO made Musk a trillionaire, though the subsequent share price declines have brought his nominal wealth back below the threshold.

But could there be complications when Musk, and other long-standing investors, try to realise this wealth?

How might lock-up expiries impact SpaceX shares?

On 6 August, the first of a series of lock-up periods for longstanding SpaceX shareholders expired.

Investment research firm Morningstar predicted these lock-up expiries could lead to waves of selling.

Lock-up periods are a period of time following an IPO during which pre-existing shareholders cannot sell their shares (for the most part, these are company insiders and any investment trusts or other institutional investors that invested in the company when it was private).

In theory this protects new investors from a sharp sell-off once the company goes public – because these pre-existing shareholders are, in theory, heavily incentivised to realise some of the value or profits from their shareholdings when a company lists. Staggering the periods at which they can sell gives the share price a chance to stabilise on the public market.

SpaceX’s lock-up periods expire in multiple tranches between 6 August and the one-year anniversary of the IPO.

Each lock-up window expiry provides an opportunity for longstanding shareholders to bank profits, and the expectation is that many of them will.

This usually sees a dip in a company’s share price as there is a sudden influx of sellers.

The 911 million SpaceX shares that became available for trading on 6 August is more than the amount that were sold in the IPO.

Musk himself won’t be able to sell his shares until June 2027, though he has previously said that he won’t sell his shares even then.

Matthew Kennedy, senior strategist at investment bank Renaissance Capital, told Morningstar that “SpaceX has the longest series of lock-up releases we’ve ever seen”.

In the event, there was no sudden deluge of selling when the first expiry hit. SpaceX shares actually rose more than 6% on 6 August.

But with more unlocks approaching in August, September and October, SpaceX’s share price could continue to fluctuate over coming weeks.

“[In the near term] lock-up expiries, a growing public float and upcoming Starship launches are likely to keep the shares volatile,” said Britzman.

With potential base rate cuts next year and changes to the ISA rules, fixed-rate savings accounts could offer an opportunity to lock in rates now for those with short term savings goals.

From the tax year 2027/28, the annual cash ISA allowance will be reduced from £20,000 to £12,000 for under-65s.

Santander’s fixed cash ISA range includes one, two, three and five-year accounts offering interest rates of up to 4.7% annual equivalent rate (AER).

The one and two-year ISAs pay 4.5% AER and the three and five-year ISAs pay 4.65% and 4.7% AER, respectively.

Analysis by Paragon Bank shows fixed and instant-access cash ISA balances grew by £38 billion to £478 billion across 25.6 million accounts between January and May.

Who can open Santander’s new fixed ISAs?

You can open an account if you’re 18 or over with a minimum deposit of £500.

Interest is paid into the accounts annually and at the end of the term. Deposits for the 2026/27 year must be made by the end of 30 September 2026.

You can withdraw money from the ISAs, but you must take out the entire balance and you’ll be charged a fee equal to 120 days’ interest.

Can I transfer an old ISA into Santander's ISAs?

If you have an ISA elsewhere with a much lower rate, and are happy to lock money away for a few years, then it is possible you can transfer it into one of Santander's new fixed deals.

Just ask the provider for the correct form so that you do not lose the tax free status of the savings.

Santander said it will also pay a hotel voucher of up to £400 when transferring in.

Santander will email you a link and registration code within 28 days of your ISA transfer completing which you need to activate within 60 days to receive the voucher(s).

It is worth noting that some providers are also paying up to £1,500 cash bonuses when transferring into a stocks and shares ISA.

How do Santander’s cash ISAs compare to the rest of the market?

Based on a deposit of £500, none of Santander’s fixed-rate cash ISAs are top of the market, but only by a small amount.

All four are also paying the highest rates out of the major high street banks, if you prefer a bank with an established name.

If the very top rate is your priority, then the one-year fixed-rate cash ISA can be beaten by Cynergy Bank paying 4.7%.

The two-year fixed-rate cash ISA by Cynergy Bank pays 4.75%. Coventry Building Society has a two-year fixed-rate deal paying 4.63%.

Its three-year fixed-rate deal is beaten by Tandem Bank, paying 4.78%. Meanwhile its five-year fixed-rate cash ISA can be beaten only by Hinckley & Rugby Building Society (4.82%).

Though, if you have a large sum and do not think you need it for five years or more, investing it could make better sense.

The average time it takes to find a buyer across England, Wales and Scotland was 62 days and the time taken to complete a purchase was 154 days in June, Rightmove finds.

Sellers with flats who have found a buyer are facing the longest wait to complete – an average of 169 days. In contrast, owners of terraced and semi-detached houses are waiting 149 days on average to complete a purchase after finding a buyer.

Johan Svanstrom, Rightmove’s CEO said this was the longest summer wait on record.

"An average 154 day wait to complete the transaction process itself is simply far too long. Rightmove data shows that in some parts of the country the delays are even more significant. Housing mobility is closely linked to economic growth. We believe greater digitisation of moving journey processes, stronger information standards and transparency to all stakeholders is key," he said.

Delays in the house-selling process were caused by a number of factors including longer chains, legal hold-ups and complications involved with selling leasehold properties.

Rightmove also said a big driver of long competition times was conveyancing solicitors dealing with high caseloads. It comes with £205 billion worth of residential property currently on sale on the Rightmove website, according to the portal's own figures, which, if sold, it said could stimulate UK economic growth.

The regions where properties are selling the fastest and slowest

The analysis reveals homes are generally much quicker to sell in the north of England and Scotland than the south of England and Wales.

It’s currently quickest to sell a home in Scotland with the time to find a buyer combined with the time to complete a purchase sitting at 127 days on average – over four months.

The second quickest place to sell a home is in the North East of England, where the total time to move home is 194 days on average.

The third quickest is Yorkshire and the Humber, with the total time to move home taking on average 207 days.

Homes take the longest to sell across Great Britain in London. It takes 70 days on average to find a buyer and 174 days to complete a purchase, a total wait of 244 days (or over eight months), Rightmove found.

Source: Rightmove

The local authorities where it’s fastest and slowest to sell a home

The 10 local authorities where it’s quickest to sell a home after finding a buyer are all in Scotland, according to Rightmove.

It is quickest to complete the sale of a property in Clackmannanshire where the average wait time is 76 days, then Angus and Dumfries and Galloway where it takes 77 days on average.

The local authority where it takes the least amount of time to complete a house sale outside of Scotland is in North East Derbyshire (120 days), then North East Lincolnshire (122 days) and Chesterfield (124 days).

The time taken to complete a sale is longest in Slough (229 days), Brentwood (209 days) and Colchester (205 days).

Source: Rightmove

How to speed up the house-selling process

Getting paperwork ready and in order can shave weeks of the house-selling process, said Nick Mendes, mortgage technical manager at broker John Charcol.

“Title deeds, Energy Performance Certificate, leasehold info, planning or building regulation certificates, all of it should be sat with your conveyancer on day one, not chased up after an offer lands," he said.

It’s also worth getting a conveyancer involved before you’ve got a buyer, not after.

“Too many sellers wait until an offer's accepted to start looking for a solicitor, and that's time you never get back. Get the ID checks, source of funds and initial searches moving early so things can progress the second a sale is agreed.”

If you’re selling a leasehold property, you can speed up the process by extending a lease through your landlord and requesting management packs as soon as possible.

It can be harder to sell a leasehold property with less time left on a lease while lenders may be reluctant to issue a mortgage to a buyer, which can also delay the house-selling process.

Management packs contain details on what the buyer is purchasing, such as service charges and insurance costs, but can take weeks to arrive.

Mendes added that it’s crucial to set a realistic asking price on your home when putting it on the market. Recent research from Zoopla found many people are setting the initial price too high which means it takes longer for a property to sell, sometimes years.

“Go in too high and have to correct it later, and you've just added time on market and given any chain a chance to fall apart,” Mendes said.

The latest £1 million jackpot winners come from Kent and Hampshire and the Isle of Wight and won with bond numbers 664BF890888 and 491KF169443, respectively.

The Kent winner bought their bond in February 2026 and has a total holding of £21,000.

The winner from Hampshire and the Isle of Wight purchased their bond in March 2022 and holds £49,850 overall in Premium Bonds, close to the maximum of £50,000.

How many prizes will be issued in August’s draw?

Roughly 6.2 million tax-free prizes worth a total of £433 million will be paid to Premium Bond prize draw winners in the August draw.

This month, there were 136 billion £1 bonds eligible for the draw.

The total value of the prizes dished out since the first draw in June 1957 is £42.3 billion.

The table below shows the breakdown of prizes in August:

Credit: NS&I

How to check if you've won in August's prize draw

NS&I’s Agent Million will inform the £1 million jackpot winners in person.

Premium Bond holders can check if they have won the smaller prizes of £25 to £100,000 the day after the first working day of each month. For August 2026, the date you can check from is 4 August.

You can do this by using the Premium Bonds prize checker app, visiting the NS&I website or asking Alexa.

The prize checker app and website will show you prizes you’ve won that month, anything you’ve won in the previous six draws and any older prizes you haven’t claimed yet.

You will need your bond number or NS&I number to access your account.

As Premium Bonds do not expire, it’s worth checking if you have any prizes waiting for you even if you bought them years ago.

NS&I says over 99% of prizes have been paid to winners since draws began in 1957, but there are still 2.8 million left unclaimed.

We look at the alternatives to Premium Bonds in a separate piece.

While Brazil does import some refined oil products, it is a net exporter of crude oil, say Alex Nae and Tae Yoon Kim for FTSE Russell Insights. The FTSE Brazil stock market index returned 47.2% last year. It rallied at the start of 2026, but remains attractively valued on a 12-month forward price/earnings ratio of 9.5, compared with an average of 12.6 in the wider FTSE Emerging index.

Foreign investors dump Brazilian stocks

Since a peak in April at the height of the Iran war, the Ibovespa has fallen 11%, but remains up 10% this year. Foreign investors pulled 14.9 billion reais (£2.2 billion) from local shares in May alone, the fastest pace in six years, say Raphael Almeida and Leda Alvim on Bloomberg. Foreign capital plays an outsized role in São Paulo, accounting for 60% of trading in Brazilian equities, the highest level in any emerging market.

The slump reflects two factors. Firstly, the AI trade has distracted investors from commodity plays. Secondly, expectations of higher inflation and interest rates act like a wet blanket on emerging-market equities. Brazil's benchmark Selic interest rate stands at 14.25%. With east Asian semiconductor firms surging, Brazil's longstanding pattern of underperformance has re-emerged. The MSCI Brazil stock market index has returned an average of 7.5% annually over the past decade, compared with an emerging-markets average of 10%.

All eyes are on general elections scheduled for 4 October. Incumbent president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva enjoys a narrow polling lead over Flávio Bolsonaro, the son of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Lula can point to “record low” unemployment and strong annual growth, which at around 3% has “outpaced expectations for three years”, says The Economist. The catch? Brazilian debt is “unsustainable on its current path”, with gross public debt forecast to hit 99% of GDP in 2030. The nominal deficit – “composed almost entirely of interest payments” – stands at a “whopping” 8.1%.

Lavish, constitutionally mandated spending on pensions is to blame. Until that is reformed, “the market will never trust Brazilian fiscal rectitude”. Stronger growth does ease the situation, says Gustavo Medeiros in the Financial Times. But it may take a market panic to persuade politicians that a credible fiscal plan is needed. Still, given Brazil’s “humbling valuations”, it wouldn’t take much good news to make the country a “compelling opportunity”.

This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

The global semiconductor supply chain is very concentrated. A handful of manufacturers and designers – Taiwan's TSMC, South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix, America's Nvidia – capture the lion's share of profits. Yet expectations have run ahead of reality. This week, SK Hynix reported a 557% surge in operating profit, with margins of more than 80%. That Midas-like profitability still wasn't good enough for investors in Korea, who sent the shares tumbling 19%. The Korean Kospi slumped 11% on Tuesday and a further 6% on Wednesday. America's Nasdaq 100 technology index has fallen 9.7% from its peak, says Eva Roytburg for Fortune.

The immediate trigger was talk of new competition from China, where chipmaker CXMT listed on Monday. Those fears are probably overdone – China still doesn't have access to the cutting-edge extreme ultraviolet lithography machines required to make the world's best chips. But the chip stock selloff isn't irrational; for months, the “going trade” has been to sell the hyperscalers – firms such as Microsoft and Meta that appear to be overspending on data centres – and “buy the semis”, companies such as Samsung that are profiting from Silicon Valley's profligacy. Now investors have realised the obvious contradiction: if Big Tech's AI investments really are as wasteful as they think, then at some point that spending will be cut, which would be a disaster for chip stocks, too.

The semiconductor boom is based on very real profits, says Moses Sternstein for a16Z. Rising earnings have come alongside falling valuations – an unusual symptom for an alleged bubble. Micron, whose earnings are poised to rise 60% year on year, trades on a mere six times forward earnings. The wider US semiconductor complex trades on about 21 times forward earnings, a slight discount to the five-year average of 23.8.

The semiconductor industry is infamously cyclical

So are semiconductors cheap? In one sense, yes, but the industry is infamously cyclical. An acute shortage during the pandemic turned into a big bust in 2023 as demand returned to normal levels. “Investors are wondering whether semis can keep it up” this time. As laptop buyers will be well aware, dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), which is used for computer memory, is in acute shortage this year.

Samsung and SK Hynix have joint plans to invest as much as $1.5 trillion to double Korea's DRAM output within five years, say Song Jung-a and Michael Acton in the Financial Times. Yet there are risks of the chip cycle turning again. Should AI demand disappoint or Chinese supply surge, there could be a glut as soon as 2028.

This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

The government-backed bank has increased the interest rates on new issues of its one, two, three, and five-year savings accounts, called British Savings Bonds.

It brings NS&I’s top interest rate to 4.75% for the new five-year guaranteed growth bond, or 4.72% for the new one-year guaranteed growth bond.

Andrew Westhead, retail director at NS&I, said: “Today’s increases mean savers can now choose from improved fixed-term rates across our one, two, three and five-year British Savings Bonds, with the certainty of knowing exactly what return they will receive over their chosen term.”

What are the new rates?

NS&I has increased rates on eight of its fixed-rate accounts, but the size of the hike differs depending on the term and type of each account.

There are two types of British Savings Bonds – guaranteed income and guaranteed growth bonds.

Guaranteed growth bonds are lump sum investments that earn a fixed rate of interest over a set period of time and are designed to be held for the full term.

Meanwhile, guaranteed income bonds pay out monthly income at a fixed rate of interest over a set period of time based on the size of your lump sum investment.

The table below shows the new and old rates for each savings account.

Source: NS&I, 31 July

Are NS&I British Savings Bonds any good?

With increased rates, new issues of NS&I’s British Savings Bonds are a lot more attractive for savers looking for high rates.

However, the accounts do not provide the absolutely highest interest rates available on the market.

NS&I’s one year fixed rate growth bond pays 4.72% interest. This is well above the market average of 4.27%, according to Moneyfacts, but still lower than the top one-year fixed rate saver from GB Bank that pays 4.92%.

Even with the new increased interest rates, you can currently find alternative accounts with stronger interest rates across all term lengths.

The table below compares the interest rate on the top fixed-term account on the market to the interest rate offered for the same term by NS&I.

Source: Moneyfacts, NS&I, 31 July

Caitlyn Eastell, personal finance analyst at Moneyfacts, said: “NS&I’s decision to increase rates on its British Savings Bonds is a welcome boost for savers and makes them a far more competitive option in the current fixed-rate savings market.”

She added: “While the market-leading fixed bonds are now paying 5%, some savers may be willing to sacrifice the extra interest for the peace of mind NS&I offers, especially those with large deposits.

“Unlike traditional savings accounts, every pound held with NS&I is backed by HM Treasury, giving savers an unlimited government guarantee rather than the £120,000 FSCS protection available with banks and building societies.”

The latest Computershare UK Dividend Monitor – a quarterly report produced by the financial administration company, which tracks share registers of limited companies, including how they return money to shareholders – said regular dividends were the driving force behind the regular payments.

In total, companies paid out £35.3 billion in the second quarter of 2026, with £34.8 billion in regular dividends – an increase of 7.4%.

Banks and mining companies were the strongest sectors. Over the three months from April to June, banking stocks paid a record £11.1 billion in dividends, up 20.6% on last year’s equivalent and contributing four fifths of the aggregate dividend growth over the period.

Strong balance sheets, persistently high interest rates and low loan book losses – leading to near-record profitability – are supporting the sector’s performance.

While a year ago, it seemed likely that interest rates would continue to fall, reducing net interest margins for banks and the interest income paid on all reserves held at the Bank of England, the picture has changed.

The report pointed to persistent inflation, which has limited the Bank of England’s ability to cut rates, in turn sustaining higher bank earnings.

“The sector’s balance sheets are very strong and this, combined with high profitability has enabled significant dividend growth,” it said.

HSBC was the biggest driver, raising its end-of-year dividend by 25%, funded partly by a suspension of its share buyback programme.

Elsewhere NatWest and Standard Chartered raised payouts by 53% and 75% respectively, while Lloyds increased its own payouts by 14%.

The top sectors that fared well on dividends

The mining sector showed a strong recovery, with dividends from miners 27.5% higher than last year’s cyclical low.

Booming copper, silver and gold prices boosted dividend increases from Antofagasta, Fresnillo and Endeavour respectively, according to the paper.

The report also said that despite slightly lower profits as a result of falling iron ore prices, strong cash flow and a robust balance sheet enabled giant Rio Tinto to increase its final payout for the year by 13%.

Overall mining sector payouts rose 27.5% on a headline basis, up £917 million year-on-year.

Healthcare payouts rose by 6.1%, led by GSK, with the same level of increase (6.1%) shown across broader financials, with London Stock Exchange Group the highest payer in that space.

Which sectors struggled with dividend payouts in Q2?

At the weaker end was the food, drink and tobacco sector, which reported a 15.9% fall, largely due to Diageo, whose earnings have faced a couple of headwinds.

The report said weaker demand for spirits as consumers rein in discretionary spending and distributors work through their excess inventories. The company halved its dividend in response.

In industrials, the report flagged “pockets of weakness”, naming packaging and paper manufacturer Mondi and recruiter Robert Walters as contributing to the 7.9% dip in the sector overall.

Broadly, 11 sectors posted an increase while nine posted a decline in their dividend levels.

What is the outlook for income investors?

As expected, the larger companies saw significantly higher dividend growth than their mid-cap counterparts, with growth levels 7.7% for the top 100 and 4.6% for the mid 250.

Special dividends remain highly unpredictable, reporting a 76% decline over the quarter to £465 million, weighing on the overall headline growth rate.

But these figures are from a high base. For context, Q2 special dividends have averaged £2.2bn over the last five years – even bigger before the pandemic. There has also been an increase in share buybacks in recent months, which might be a factor. The paper notes that this is a mere notable correlation not a proven cause.

While dividend growth is expected to slow in the second half of the year, the strength of the payments in Q2 have led the business to increase its forecast from 3.1% to 3.4%.

UK equities look set for a yield of 3.2% over the next 12 months, while volatile bond markets amid geopolitical uncertainty are underpinning ‘best-buy’ cash savings rates of 4.2% for an average easy access account.

• The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) voted to keep interest rates at 3.75% today.
• Though a majority of the nine-person committee voted to keep hold rates, a growing number are now voting for rates to rise.
• The latest decision is a continuation of the MPC’s ‘wait and see’ approach to setting rates, holding off on a hike or cut until we see concrete evidence of how the war is affecting the UK.
• Inflation is expected to peak at 3.2% in the final quarter of 2026, according to the Bank’s latest forecast.

When will interest rates fall further? | Is the UK heading for stagflation? | MPC meeting dates | UK inflation forecast |

Analysis by think tank the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) shows high taxes and slowing house price growth are among a range of factors that have hit people’s wealth.

The latest records from its Millionaire Tracker show that there were 442,000 sterling millionaires in Britain last year, down by 7% since 2024.

This has been blamed on falling real asset prices, a low household savings rate and the emigration of high net-worth individuals (HNWIs) amid the abolition of non-dom status and fears of a wealth tax.

To reverse this trend, the ASI is calling on the government to make the tax environment more welcoming to wealth creators. In particular, they've suggested the abolition of inheritance tax, cuts to capital gains tax and an international competitiveness assessment on the UK’s tax and regulatory treatment of non-doms and HNWIs.

Mitchell Palmer, economist at the Adam Smith Institute, said: “The decline in millionaires may be greeted as a success by some on the left, but it should instead be viewed as a warning signal. Every millionaire that leaves means less capital for British businesses, fewer international connections, and weaker entrepreneurial spirit in the economy.”

Why is the number of UK millionaires falling?

The ASI uses Office for National Statistics data to estimate the number of constant-price sterling millionaires.

Its definition of a constant-price sterling millionaire is an adult British resident who has at least £1 million in individual net worth, across all real and financial asset classes, including pensions and property, measured in constant 2025 prices.

The figure of 442,000 is the lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis .

A range of factors have pushed this figure down.

The ASI said: “Higher interest rates, as well as a lack of confidence in the British economy, have mechanically reduced the inflation-adjusted values of pension pots and high-end London property.

“Moreover, Britain’s low savings rate has reduced the pace at which households make themselves millionaires. Finally, and perhaps most concerningly, there has been a well-documented trend of high net-worth individuals either leaving Britain or no longer choosing to move here.”

Millionaires are leaving the country for a number of reasons, the ASI said, including the abolition of non-dom tax status, high levels of general taxation, and a hostile culture for wealth creators.

The think tank also warns that calls for a wealth tax are misguided.

It said: “France, Austria, and the Netherlands all abandoned theirs after seeing vast outflows of millionaires or other avoidance behaviour. Given Britain is already haemorrhaging wealth, we could only expect similar results here.

“Every millionaire that leaves is a loss to the country. Both foreign- and British-origin millionaires bring jobs, capital, connections, and ideas to this country, which can create substantial wealth for other Brits.”

The think tank argues that millionaires already pay a disproportionate share of tax, with the top 1% of earners paying 29.1% of income tax.

Palmer added: “Recently mooted anti-wealth proposals, such as a wealth tax or equalising the capital gains tax rate with income tax, will only make this problem worse.

“Instead, the government should focus on making Britain an attractive place for ambitious people to build and keep their wealth. This includes cutting or abolishing inheritance tax and capital gains tax.”

How can you protect your wealth?

Many wealthy people may be concerned about calls for a wealth tax or higher taxes.

Nouran Moustafa, practice principal at Roxton Wealth, said she is seeing more high-net-worth clients ask how they can protect or diversify wealth outside Britain, with some considering leaving.

She said: “Those worried about preserving wealth should avoid panic. They should review diversification, tax wrappers, pensions, liquidity and estate planning, while keeping their strategy flexible enough to withstand future policy changes.”

Paul Denley, chief executive at Oakham Wealth Management, added: “For those staying, the answer isn’t panic but planning: diversify globally, use every available tax allowance, review estate and succession planning, and avoid irreversible decisions based on short-term headlines. Wealth is usually lost gradually through poor decisions, not overnight.”

It comes after The i Paper reported he was looking at ways to replace the current property taxation system with either a proportional property tax or a land value tax.

However, Number 10 has denied Burnham is considering scrapping council tax and stamp duty.

A spokesperson told MoneyWeek that rumours the prime minister is considering replacing stamp duty and council tax with either a proportional property tax or a land value tax are “not true”.

They added: "As has always been the case, decisions on tax are a matter for the chancellor to set out at fiscal events.”

Burnham has previously said it is unfair that households in affluent parts of London (like Wandsworth or Westminster) are paying far less in council tax than households in poorer areas where house prices are much lower.

In an interview with the BBC on 26 July, Burnham said: “There are people here in Manchester who pay a much higher council tax than people living in much larger homes in London.

“[Former Labour chancellor] Rachel Reeves was right to start to reform council tax to create some fairness there in relation to people in homes that are of much greater value who haven’t seen their council tax go up over the years because of the failure to revalue the banding.”

A proportional property tax would mean higher taxes for people in expensive homes

It had been rumoured that Burnham was considering removing council tax and stamp duty and replacing it with a flat 0.48% annual charge on a home’s current value, although Number 10 has since said this is “not true”.

This proportional property tax method would greatly reduce the amount of council tax people in areas with lower house prices pay while increasing the amount people in more expensive areas pay.

For example, a property in the North East (the area in England where house prices are lowest) cost an average of £181,133 in June, according to Lloyds.

Assuming the tax is levied at a flat 0.48%, the typical household would have to pay £869 a year. This is far lower than the Band D council tax rate in Newcastle of £2,540.

On the other hand, the average house in London, which costs £534,831 according to Lloyds, would pay £2,567 a year. This is far more than a Band D property would pay in all London boroughs.

The most expensive London borough for council tax is Kingston upon Thames where Band D costs £2,050 a year – a household here would pay around £500 more annually under the proportional property tax proposal.

Meanwhile, the borough with the lowest council tax rate is Westminster, where a Band D property pays just £935 a year in council tax – over £1,500 less than the proposed proportional property tax for the average London house.

However, properties in Westminster are far more expensive than in the rest of London – they cost £836,000 on average, according to the ONS.

As the proportional property tax proposal is a flat annual levy on a home’s current value, the more expensive your home is, the more you will have to pay. For example, a home worth £1.3 million would have to pay £6,240 a year.

Could a land value tax be introduced?

Reports from The i Paper also suggested Burnham’s team was looking at a land value tax (LVT) as an alternative to stamp duty and council tax.

A land value tax is paid on the value of the land that a property sits on, rather than the value of the property itself.

This means that, theoretically, a large five-bedroom house in a remote and unappealing area of the country would pay far less in tax than a similar house in the middle of London.

Research by Tax Policy Associates suggests that if land value tax was introduced, households in almost all parts of the country would pay much less tax, whereas those who live close to large cities would generally pay much more.

Could the ‘mansion tax’ threshold be lowered?

In the 2025 Autumn Budget, then-chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a new tax on expensive homes. The High Value Council Tax Surcharge will take effect in April 2027, based on 2026 property values.

Dubbed the ‘mansion tax’, it means households who live in properties worth more than £2 million will have to pay an additional council tax surcharge of between £2,500 and £7,500 a year depending on the value of their home.

The resident is usually liable to pay council tax, but the mansion tax applies to homeowners, rather than occupiers, meaning tenants wouldn’t be responsible for paying the surcharge.

Before Burnham became prime minister, the Mail of Sunday reported he was looking at lowering the mansion tax threshold to £1.5 million, potentially pulling 150,000 additional households into paying the tax.

Would you pay more tax under the proposals?

The biggest winners of a proportional property tax or a land tax would be people who live in inexpensive homes in parts of the country where property is cheap. With low house prices, a 0.48% annual charge would likely be far less than current council tax rates.

They would also pay less under a land value tax, assuming their property is not in a major city or the south east of England.

On the other hand, the biggest losers would be people who live in expensive houses in expensive parts of the country – especially people living in parts of London where council tax is currently low.

Those looking to buy a home in some of the UK’s most attractive postcodes are stuck paying a premium for location – but by looking at properties just beyond the boundaries, you could potentially spend hundreds of thousands of pounds less.

On average, properties in postcodes next to the most sought-after locations are 28% cheaper than their counterparts, and in many places this discount is higher, the research shows.

For example, buyers in the North East can find the biggest savings. House prices in the seaside town of Whitley Bay are £304,022 on average, but ones in the neighbouring port town of Blyth are just £162,075 on average – a saving of 47%, or £141,947.

Amanda Bryden, head of mortgages at Lloyds, said: “It’s easy to focus on the ‘must -have’ locations when you’re searching for a home, but this research highlights just how much value can sit right next door.”

While these homes are in less sought-after areas, they have the benefit of being significantly cheaper, making them much more affordable while still being close to prestige areas. This can be helpful, especially for those trying to get onto the property ladder.

Byden added: “Of course, neighbouring areas aren't always directly comparable and each will have its own distinctive character, housing stock and local appeal. But in many parts of the country, looking just beyond the most sought-after postcodes can reveal more affordable options while still keeping buyers close to jobs, transport links, amenities and the communities that matter to them.”

Where in your region has the biggest postcode discount?

Discounts can be found by looking in neighbouring postcodes all across the country.

While the biggest example by percentage is the gap between Whitley Bay and Blyth, you can still find sizable discounts elsewhere in the UK.

For example, people who buy in South Luton and surrounding areas in Eastern England rather than the pricier Harpenden could, on average, save the most amount of money, by changing postcodes.

The average home in Harpenden costs £587,884, while it’s £351,742 in the South Luton LU1 postcode area. This means there’s a postcode price gap of £236,142, or 40%.

Likewise in Greater London, buyers could save £232,419 (30%) by moving to Cricklewood in the capital’s NW2 postcode, rather than NW3, which covers Hampstead, Belsize Park and surrounding areas.

On the other hand, the smallest savings are seen in Northern Ireland. The largest postcode gap is between the BT4 postcode that encompasses East Belfast and the BT16 postcode that covers Dundonald and the surrounding areas.

The average house price in the BT4 postcode is £278,143, compared to £247,068 in the BT16 postcode – a potential saving of £31,075 or 11%.

The table below shows the neighbouring postcodes where buyers can find the biggest savings in each region of the UK.

Source: Lloyds, 27 July

Wherever you look, the stocks that are doing best are linked to AI demand, while those that are AI-agnostic or an “AI loser” are mostly lagging. The emerging markets index is now trading like an AI play, due to TSMC, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, but this is by no means the only example.

Among Japanese stocks, the top performers are firms such as Kioxia, a chipmaker that soared from ¥1,455 when it floated in December 2024 to a high of ¥112,700 in June. Other big hitters include tech conglomerate Softbank and firms involved in chipmaking and testing such as Advantest, Murata Manufacturing and Tokyo Electron.

Implausible-sounding companies such as food-seasonings firm Ajinomoto and toilet manufacturer Toto have also been carried along: their core businesses make them leaders in materials that play a role in the chip-supply chain.

Japanese stocks have made a strong start to the year

“The result has been an unusually narrow, yet powerful market,” note Alex Bowles and Brett Moshal of the Japan equity team at asset manager Orbis. As of the end of June, the Topix index has made a strong start to the year (up 19%), yet only a third of Japanese stocks have beaten the benchmark. A basket of 67 AI companies accounts for 14 percentage points of that return.

This has been a headwind for any investors underexposed to AI, although Bowles and Moshal argue that it is also creating contrarian opportunities. They point to Nintendo, which has halved amid fears of a memory crunch hurting hardware sales in the short term, but also the threat that AI poses to its competitive advantage in game development. This is overdone given the strength of Nintendo's intellectual property, they argue.

Foreign investors held back by a weak yen

Diversification between regions may not be much protection if the AI boom ends badly. That said, for now, the market is still doing well, and the drag for foreigners is the currency.

The yen keeps weakening and now stands at ¥163 to the US dollar and ¥218 to the pound. There has been little sign of this bottoming out, notwithstanding talk of “appropriate and bold action” by the finance minister this week. The result is that Japan has become one of the cheapest developed-market countries to live in, note Jim Reid and his team at Deutsche Bank. In purchasing power parity terms, with price levels measured on the basis that the US is 100, Japan now comes in at 60; in 2012 it was at 125.

In theory, the yen is deeply undervalued. Yet this has been near-consensus and it keeps sliding. Our exchange-traded fund (ETF) portfolio is invested in Japan through Vanguard FTSE Japan (LSE: VJPN) and this has done fine, but clearly a currency-hedged ETF would have done better. We are sticking with the unhedged position since we expect the yen to rally eventually – but iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged (LSE: IJPH) or UBS Core MSCI Japan hGBP (LSE: UB0D) are other options to cut the risk it falls further.

This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.

Business leaders hope so. Gregor Paterson, fund manager in the UK team at fund management group Amati Global Investors, highlights that the new prime minister ought to have the expertise on hand to do so.

“Burnham himself has a lot of experience, and has a pretty heavyweight team of advisers around him,” says Paterson. “He must be aware – as we all are – of how much Keir Starmer’s team struggled to get the economy moving, and you’d hope that he has a plan.”

The sense of urgency is critical. One key frustration with the previous government was the lack of clarity around policy direction, especially around the Budget.

“Businesses weren’t able to hire, expand or build because they didn’t know what was coming,” Paterson says, pointing out successive delays around fiscal events, whereas Burnham already looks to be moving at pace.

“It looks like he’s putting his team in place and keen to get things moving much more quickly than might have been the case if there had been a messy leadership battle.”

To the business community, speed and clarity are essential for planning – not merely political virtues. There is a deeply felt need for a credible and ambitious growth strategy.

Anna Leach, chief economist at business leaders’ professional body the Institute of Directors (IoD), says some elements of the previous government’s approach were well-intended but overshadowed by uncertainty.

“We need a better industrial strategy and it all needs to be done a bit more quickly and at a grander scale,” she says.

Infrastructure is a key area of focus

Leach would welcome a clearer long-term framework that gives companies the confidence to commit capital, hire staff and expand their operations.

Planning reform and infrastructure investment should form two central pillars of a growth strategy and she supports Burnham’s ambitions for a more balanced economy.

“A regional growth agenda and devolution are really good ideas. There’s strong economic evidence that – if well-designed – these can deliver strong growth and help draw in private sector investment,” she adds.

But execution will be key.

“It does come down to design because while Manchester looks like it has been successful, I don’t think one could look at Wales and Scotland and say that devolution has unleashed any animal spirits in those two regions.”

Job market dynamics are another area of concern. Cost pressures have intensified, the jobs market has cooled, hiring is declining and vacancies are falling. This all raises questions over how to meet conflicting priorities.

“We want to see how we shape the labour market in a way that balances everybody’s needs… because at the moment things are looking a little bit risky, particularly when you layer in artificial intelligence,” says Leach.

All eyes on Burnham’s tax policies

Given the £3 trillion debt burden, the key question is one of tax. For many in the business community, their immediate wish is not further reform but stability, with uncertainty particularly acute around the non-domicile regime.

“The constant speculation about what tax increases should fall on wealth creators, following big tax increases on businesses themselves, is all detrimental to private sector investment,” adds Leach.

She also highlights the cumulative effect as the business tax burden has been creeping up in successive budgets.

“In the near term… more certainty and a lack of vilification of business would be pretty pleasant to start with.”

Darius McDermott, managing director of investment platform Chelsea Financial Services agrees; he’s a clear believer that if you overtax the wealthy, they will leave the country, shrinking future potential tax revenues.

“If additional rate taxpayers face a 1% increase, I don’t expect you’d see a huge outcry. But if it goes up to 60% over a certain number, then I think you’d see a lot of unhappy wealthy people,” he says.

Markets rely on confidence as well as policy

From a market perspective, the challenge is not just policy design but sentiment.

According to Anna Macdonald, investment strategy director at Hargreaves Lansdown, the UK needs a “credible, investment-friendly plan for economic growth, alongside clarity and stability on tax”, otherwise investors will remain hesitant.

“Constant speculation, including around capital gains tax, risks making people more cautious about moving their money from cash into long-term investments, at precisely the moment when the UK needs more people to invest for their future.”

Critics of Starmer say that Labour was voted in on the promise of growth and change, but it soon emerged he didn’t have a clear plan to achieve it.

“What markets want to see is how we're going to start to grow the economy and grow productivity. We thought the answer to that previously was going to be in housebuilding but that didn’t really materialise,” adds Paterson.

“When you have such high levels of debt, you have to grow your economy. And I think neither people nor businesses feel confident enough to invest – hire people, build factories and expand.”

It’s early days, but if Burnham can shift the mindset, his impact could be significant.

“If he can inject some confidence back into the system, then people and businesses will hopefully start to react,” adds Paterson.

One move that would encourage investors towards UK companies is if the new administration were to lower the rate of stamp duty reserve tax on most UK-listed stocks and shares.

Currently investors directly purchasing more than £1,000 of UK-listed shares, unless they were newly listed or traded on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) – even inside an ISA – would need to pay 0.5% stamp duty.

“If you were to buy Tesco shares to put in your ISA, you’ll pay half a percent tax when you buy those shares, but if you buy Walmart shares, you won't pay any tax,” Paterson says.

Scaled up, those amounts soon mount up. He says as well as eroding returns, the UK could be putting itself at a disadvantage compared to other markets.

“It’s something most markets don’t have. The French do, but it's only 0.3% and it’s only on the very largest companies. So we're a bit of an outlier in charging people to participate in our stock market.”

Which investments could benefit under Burnham’s government?

John Healey being named chancellor was the big announcement many of us were waiting for.

He stood down as defence secretary on 11 June in protest over insufficient funding of the country’s defence strategy; he’d been calling for a defence budget of 3% of GDP by 2030.

Healey’s appointment saw a bounce in some defence names. Babcock International Group (LON:BAB) jumped roughly 7% following the news and BAE Systems (LON:BA.) was also up around 3% the following day. Both share prices climbed further over the next few days.

While it remains to be seen which defence companies are the specific longer-term beneficiaries, the sector as a whole will be a clear structural winner, according to McDermott.

He says: “The increase in spend isn’t over one year; it’s a multi-year increase. We may see the investment into companies from other countries, the US or elsewhere, but I think European defence, of which we’re obviously a subsector, is likely to see a decent amount of growth over the next decade.”

As always, individual investors should try to avoid overreacting to political headlines or any market noise as the new government sets out its plans.

“Changing a long-term investment strategy in response to a change of chancellor can easily do more harm than good. Staying invested and focused on long-term goals remains the most sensible approach,” says Macdonald.