Wise contrarians win out

“What the wise man does in the beginning, the fool does in the end.” That’s how Howard Marks of Oaktree Capital began his talk at the 2013 Value Investor Conference last week. He explained what he sees as being the three stages of a bull market.

The first happens when a few people begin to believe that things will get better. The second comes when most investors realise that improvement is actually underway, and the third when everyone is sure that “things will get better forever”.

This last one – think the second quarter of 2007 – is characterised by the “extreme brevity of financial memory” and so by the same silly justifications over and over again. “This time it is different” people say, usually just before they point you to an investment that “is so good that the price doesn’t matter” – when in fact, all that matters is the price.

The key to success is getting in during the first stage and out during the last. How? As ever, it is simple, but not remotely easy. If you want to prevent yourself being the fool, you have no choice but to be consistently contrarian, to build “uncomfortably idiosyncratic portfolios” and, as Mark Twain said, to remember that “whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform”.

 

So where are we now? With markets knocking around all-time nominal highs, is it time to reform? Not yet, says Marks. The “existence of improvement is generally accepted”, but is neither particularly widespread or overdone. He reckons we are in stage two – “somewhere in the middle”.

Marks has a similar set of three stages for bear markets. The first stage comes when just a few investors recognise that, despite the prevailing bullishness, things won’t always be rosy. The second comes when most investors realise things are deteriorating, and the third when “everyone’s convinced that things can only get worse” (as in early 2009).

I was thinking about this as I looked at the numbers out from the housing market this week. We saw stage one of a property bear market post-2007. And it felt like we entered stage two as well. But look at the data and you’ll see stage three never quite arrived.

The latest RICS residential market survey shows that surveyors as a whole feel happier about prices and sales. The Council of Mortgage Lenders tells us that the number of first-time buyers jumped by 20% in March. And Land Registry data show prices across Britain rose 5.5% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2013.

So is it all over? Are we back to somewhere in the middle for the housing market too? We’d like to think so (we are mostly reluctant homeowners at MoneyWeek), but history doesn’t offer many examples of bear markets that skip the bit where asset prices actually hit fair value on the way down. So despite the happy numbers and the wall of government-sponsored money being chucked into housing, we aren’t yet convinced.

3 Responses

  1. 18/05/2013, Ellen wrote

    The UK housing market is a complete mystery. Housing is simply unaffordable to all newcomers and younger people. Wages continue to be driven down and we have concerted government efforts to continue to make housing more expensive. Vendors hold out for crazy prices and potential buyers can’t afford them. More and more people are living where they don’t want to live as a result. All in an attempt to get Mr Osborne re elected in two year time!

  2. 19/05/2013, middlewaged wrote

    The difference in this case is government intervention. Its not a free market. So what will happen to house prices depends on government and thats the scary part.

  3. 23/05/2013, acassa wrote

    Government indeed is the key – distorting when it doesn’t suit them to see the 3rd stage you describe, e.g. stock or housing market reaching a bottom (i.e overshooting a mean). These are vote losers – people feel poorer. So we see QE, artificially low interest rates, other incentives to promote housebuying. This stores up a bigger problem and the easiest response is to do more of the same rather than deal with it until the undoing is seen as not an option as it’s too big – like letting the banks collapse.
    The logical end – war or revolution but more likely, a gradual deterioration in wealth of developed Western, indebted nations via creeping (underreported) inflation and stagnant or falling wages as has occurred in the past 5 years or so.

Comment on this article

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Plugging into the future

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 3 FREE Issues
Shale gas 'fracking' promises to transform Britain's energy market. Find out what it is, what it means, and how to invest.

More from MoneyWeek

The problem with the Bank of England

Fracking: Nine reasons not to get carried away

Five small-cap stocks worth a flutter

This Dutch company could help us tame floods