The last bubble

David Cameron wearing a hard hat © Getty images
David Cameron should stick to his brief

You sometimes have to sit back and wonder – what exactly is the point of government?

Secure our borders, sure. Educate the kids. Look after those without other means. Oh, and make someone pay for it, of course, by taxing them.

What else? What about when it comes to the biggest investment most of us will ever make – a house?

I did most of my growing up during the ’80s, so I remember Margaret Thatcher’s great push towards home ownership. Back then, the government did far more than just the basics.

Quite the opposite, in fact – it was right in the middle of things. We had tax relief on mortgages, councils forced to flog homes to tenants, and banks with the green light to lend as they saw fit.

And I don’t know if it’s some kind of ’80s nostalgia, but now this government is trying it all over again!

But this time, they’ve gone too far. They’ve encroached upon a sacred place – an Englishman’s castle. And I think it’s all going to come crashing down.

Don’t believe me? There are signs everywhere.

The housing market’s debt trap

Here’s the first one – we’ve got the major house-builders geeing us up for a great season. This week, Taylor Wimpey told us to expect fantastic results when it reports later this month.

Doesn’t sound so bad, does it? But get this – they also indicate that nearly half of sales are now coming through the government’s Help to Buy scheme.

Remember that this is the scheme that was brought in to pull the housing market out of its post-recession funk. Well, that’s happened now – but it seems the government just can’t let go! That’s why the scheme has been extended all the way to 2020.

As I said on Monday, it’s a concerted, and indeed, controlled effort coming from the central planners. An effort that encourages as many people as possible into a debt trap.

Worse still, the planners even stick in a ‘Brucie Bonus’ from the taxpayer to ensure enough folk take up the debt challenge!

This isn’t how it’s supposed to work.


Sign up for a 4-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek magazine

MoneyWeek magazine signup

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd.


It shouldn’t work like this

We’re not supposed to be living in a command – or planned – economy.

It is not a government’s job to gerrymander demand or supply in an economy. And it’s certainly not for them to control where we invest our money.

At most, a government should use tax to steer citizens. If saving is good, give us a decent Isa, or pension wrapper. If you want us to emit less CO2, tax the hell out of petrol.

But don’t put taxpayers’ money on the block to guide people into an investment (or debt-trap, as I would call it in this case).

Sure, the builders are doing well out of the affair. And of course, the omnipresent banking industry is also making a tidy buck. And I do accept there are knock-on benefits for the economy at large.

But anyone with a sense of history just knows this will all come crashing down. Just think of all of these points…

Three big warning signs

First, don’t forget that it was actually US government policy to stoke up housing demand in the run-up to the 2008 sub-prime crisis.

We now have the UK government doing the exact same.

Second, though it was widely known that a speculative boom was underway, US punters piled in regardless – cheap mortgages always bring in the punters.

And heck, if they’re not coming, then just plant a government scheme to double the intake.

Third, when the house of cards collapsed, it was the central bank that bailed out its troublesome children banks.

I reckon that last point is the most worrying. What happens when things go wrong again?

The next bailout

Well, I’ve heard it said that the governments bailed out the banks last time. This time, there’s nobody big enough to bail out governments.

But that’s rot. The central banks will bail out governments in exactly the way they always have. Print, print and print! There’s always whisky in the jar.

Just think about it. Today, Western governments practically are the economy. You can’t dissect the two. You certainly can’t bring one down without the other.

Though I grew up during the ’80s, the ’90s were more instructive. The fall of the Berlin Wall opened up a whole new plain, and I saw buckled nations where the government was the economy.

Let’s not go back there! To avoid ruin, keep your investments as far away from the central planners as possible.

The guys in charge are going to bring down the whole facade. Just give them time.

This article is taken from our FREE daily investment email The Right Side.
The Right Side is our FREE contrarian investment email delivered every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. It cuts through market noise to deliver useful, shrewd and to-the-point advice - straight to your inbox. Please enter a valid email address

To sign-up enter your email address.



Information in The Right Side is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. The Right Side is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

4 Responses

  1. 10/07/2014, WhyNot wrote

    Joining up the dots – everyone (Govt, LPA’s, Councils etc.) are obsessed with Affordable Housing to replace sold council housing where the proceeds have been trousered by councils without building new properties

    There are various flavours of Affordable – ranging from shared ownership right through to wholly owned council, and whilst it makes sense to have mixed estates (market .v. affordable) it becomes contradictory where the developer builds the Affordable element of an estate for free and then the market element is expected to pay a premium on their own properties to subsidise the Affordable element

    Enter ‘help to buy’ – all this does is assist buyers pay for Affordable housing – i.e. pay a premium on their own house of 50%-60% for the privilege of underwriting someone else’s house. Therefore a young couple who have saved for their first house has to pay an additional premium to cover Affordable & CIL – brilliant !

    So the question has to be – are the Govt initiatives simply covertly off-loading responsibility for funding affordable housing away from local councils and onto other house buyers

  2. 10/07/2014, Rags to riches wrote

    It is not good to artificially inflate house prices. At present it is happening through the “help to buy scheme” but over the long term it is by not having sufficient houses for the population. On the basis that no political party (apart from UKIP) is going to restrict immigration,the only solution left is to build more houses. Unfortunately, the governments of recent times do not seem willing to legislate to allow this to happen.

  3. 10/07/2014, burstingbubble wrote

    Bengt, you (along with many commentators/housebuilders/estate agents, etc.) seem to have forgotten the most important thing driving UK housing demand, and that is ultra-low interest rates. Merryn, in an article last year, referred to a notice she keeps above her desk which reads simply ’0.5%’ in large type. There may be a slight lack of housing supply, but it is the availability of cheap mortgages which really tips the balance in the housing market. When interest rates return to something like normal, say 3-4%, the excess demand will be snuffed out, along with many house ‘owners’ who have enjoyed interest-only mortgage deals for the last few years.

  4. 10/07/2014, Pinkers Post wrote

    Bubble trouble! Not a day goes by without yet another scaremongering report on the UK housing bubble and the inevitable armageddon following the great burst. Society as we know it will be annihilated: It will, without doubt, be the end of civilisation. Except, things never seem to work out the way we predict – terribly annoying! In fact, the markets hate nothing more than being told which direction they will take. May I take the liberty and quote Her Majesty: “Why did nobody see it coming?”, referring to the great crunch. As for the so-called London “property bubble”, it’s a myth. There never has been a bubble nor will there ever be one and this is why: (entry 4 May, pls scroll down) http://pinkerspost.com/post.php

    The Bank of England should resist the media hype and refrain from “popping” a bubble that does not exist in the first place… and then “mopping” the property market in the process.

Comment on this article

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Paying by mobile

Why your phone will replace your wallet

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues
Shale gas 'fracking' promises to transform Britain's energy market. Find out what it is, what it means, and how to invest.

Which investment platform?

When it comes to buying shares and funds, there are several investment platforms and brokers to choose from. They all offer various fee structures to suit individual investing habits.
Find out which one is best for you.