For big income, look off the beaten track

The way I see it, there are three different types of stocks.

Any investor knows about the first one, the standard blue chips – they make up the guts of most investment portfolios.

Next, you’ve got the more speculative stuff, stocks that add a little spice (not unlike my recent lithium play, which is up nearly three times in just a matter of months!)

But there’s a third, less well-known type of equity. It’s a solid, blue chip type of stock, and yet it’s way off the beaten track for most investors. Stocks like this one are found in areas where mostly only professional investors go.

I’m talking about specialist investment vehicles: tradable stocks which are set up to achieve specific aims. They’re not regular listed companies, and if you choose correctly, they offer you the security of a bigger blue-chip with returns you’ll only find ‘off the beaten track’.

When I find a good one, I’m always sure to tell you about it – like the Close Brothers Commodities Trust I recommended a few years ago. That one did well.

Well today, I want to revisit just one of those types of stocks.

It’s called the CATCo Reinsurance Opportunities Fund (LON:CAT), and I first covered it back in November last year. It’s a fund which is traded on the London stock market.

Since I first wrote about it, it’s been doing really rather well. It’s consistently stuck to its mandate to pay out Libor plus 5%, and I expect things to continue that way. Here’s why.

Funds like this don’t come along too often

Catco is an investment trust that’s quoted in London which you can buy through your normal broker. For a fuller picture, here’s another link to the introductory article I published in November.

The trust makes its money in the reinsurance market. Reinsurance is essentially about insuring the insurers… especially in areas like catastrophe, where the size and nature of claims could bust any single insurance company.

Reinsurance is big business, and as you can imagine, floods and hurricanes aren’t much correlated with the financial markets.

The fund floated in 2010, and 2011 and 2012 were awful years for catastrophes and catastrophe insurers. We had earthquakes in New Zealand and Japan, together with a deadly tsunami; there was major flooding in Thailand and Australia, as well as hurricanes Sandy and Irene in and around the USA. Even the running aground of the ferry Costa Concordia cost Catco a packet!

But despite these freakishly high claims, Catco’s reinsurance book was strong enough to stick to its mandate throughout – the one I mentioned a moment ago, to pay shareholders a yield of Libor (the – low – rate at which banks lend to one another) plus 5%. In fact, that target has been maintained every year since the fund floated.

Anyway, after bad years in 2011 and 2012, 2013 proved far less catastrophic. And now that things have normalised, this stock is really starting to come into its own…

Given that I suggested looking at the stock in November, most of the year was safely in the bag.

And come January, management made a fantastic decision – to not only continue paying the standard dividend (about a 5% yield), but to pay out a special dividend too.

To put that special dividend in perspective, it’s an extra return (on top of the dividend) of just under 20%. Not bad in these yield-free times!

Is now a good time to buy?

Now that we’re half way through this year, without any significant claims on the horizon, I’m happy to stick with this fund and hope for more of the same.

This is not a standard sort of stock market investment. The company is not about capital growth. It’s not like all the weird and wonderful companies you’ll normally read about. Here the objective is to achieve 12-15% above Libor.

Yes, of course there’s risk involved. This is no bank deposit paying a fixed 2% for three years. If you want 5% plus, then you’re going to be taking on some risk.

But at least you get the upside if the risks turn out in your favour. It’s not all gobbled up by a greedy financial industry. Yes, the managers of this fund get paid well. But at least it’s transparent and it’s a normal fee for a job done well.

When I first mentioned the fund in November, it was trading at $1.12. Right now, the stock is about $1.09 to buy. Given that the company has paid out around 23 cents in the meantime, returns are looking very solid.

This isn’t the most exciting stock in the world. It’s an income play. But for a decent income, with a powerful bonus potential, it’s a smart bet.

Look at it that way, and I don’t think you’ll be disappointed… you might even get a pleasant post-Christmas bonus too.

 

  • FR

    Would appreciate an update on “HRT participacoes petroleo” and “Agriterra”.

  • hgiderek

    Citywire quotes CAT as having a TER of 2.88%.
    Doesn’t this wipe out any advantage for this trust ?

  • Indibindi

    I second FR’s comment above requesting an update from Mr Bengt Saelensminde on HRT Participacoes em Petroleo. After he hotly tipped this stock several times with comments like “Today I want to recommend that you buy a hugely exciting oil stock”, it lost 80% of its value. However I have nowhere found any follow up from him regarding either an explanation as to what happened or the prospects for this “investment” in the future. I speak as one who has lost 80%. At the bottom of several of his recent articles a number of people have recently commented that they would appreciate feedback from him on this matter so one might think that Mr Saelensminde would oblige, rather than ignore such requests, if he wishes to maintain a readership and interest in his articles going forward? I call on him for a response and shall check here for same.

  • Lets Be Avin U ???

    Ditto FR & Indibindi as I also followed Bengt’s advice on this super stock !!!!

  • DrD

    I’ve got sympathy with the readers here but we as investors we shouldn’t need reminding that a Journalists main quality is to be interesting, not to be correct. If Bengt had such a fanstastic track record as an investor I would have thought he wouldn’t be writing articles in a magazine for a living, he’d be too busy running a hedgefund or investment company…

    A note for Bengt/moneyweek. In the interest of transparancy it would be great to keep an updated table of previous tips please. Nobody would expect a 100% track record of success, but it would help readers to appreciate the risks they incur.

  • FR

    Hi,
    I am normally a reasonable man and I am the one to be blamed if I lose money by following someone else’s tips. I am humble enough to recognize it publicly.

    What makes me upset are the articles revisiting the old stocks that made money, but never the ones that he lost. I am not looking for apologies of nothing like that as I am responsible for my own acts as I said before. But it is not fair to new readers as it may give the wrong impressions that his tips are great and that you should always follow.

  • GC

    There are disclaimres all over the sites. If you are blindly following what someone else advises you then you should not be investing your money on your own and should rather pay someone else to do it for you. Nobody is to blame but yourself.

    *** That being said MoneyWeek there is no disclaimer on this post, there realy should be one on every post to avoid being blamed by people that can’t think for themselves.

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
In the balance

How May 2015 could hit your pocket

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues

Russell Napier: deflation is coming – hold on to your cash

Financial historian Russell Napier talks to Merryn Somerset Webb about the next deflationary bust – why it's coming, what it means for you, and how you can survive it.


Which investment platform?

When it comes to buying shares and funds, there are several investment platforms and brokers to choose from. They all offer various fee structures to suit individual investing habits.
Find out which one is best for you.


28 November 1660: the Royal Society is founded

After the restoration of the monarchy, members of the 'Invisible College' asked King Charles II to approve their scientific and literary society on this day in 1660.