We really can’t forecast all that well. We pretend that we can but we can’t. And markets do really weird things sometimes because they react to the way people behave, and sometimes people are a little screwy.
– Alan Greenspan, speaking this week on The Daily Show
Jobs report leaves Fed in doubt, was a big headline yesterday morning.
Later in the day came this: Dow down 54 on jobs concern.
What is the Fed in doubt about? Whether to taper or not to taper; that is the question.
And why should a jobs report make any difference?
Oh, dear reader, where have you been? Don’t you know that everyone now sits on the edge of their seat wondering when and how the Fed will actually back off from its massive QE (quantitative easing) programme? And don’t you know the future of civilisation hangs in the balance?
Ah. On that point, we have a position, a thought, a reaction. Civilisation hangs in the balance, but not in the way you think.
We have been trying to introduce a new way of looking at civilisation. In short, we’ve tried to make it more civilised.
What is the difference between a civilised community and a barbaric one? We have introduced a simple test: the civilised community relies mostly on cooperation and consent. The uncivilised community depends heavily on force and violence.
A French historian first introduced the word ‘civilisation’ less than 300 years ago. Since then there has been much argument about what it actually means. We enter the fray gingerly, but sure of ourselves. It only makes sense on our terms, and no others: a civilised community is peaceful; a barbaric one is not.
“Okay Bill”, you may be saying to yourself. “I’ll give you that one, I guess, but what the hell difference does it make? What has it got to do with the jobs report?”
Good questions. Glad you asked.
Bill Bonner on markets, economics & the madness of crowds
Receive Bill Bonner's free daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox
We know from bitter experience that trying to force economies to do what you want is a thankless task. Markets are fundamentally based on free exchange, cooperation, trust and trade. Force them in one direction or another and you are just asking for trouble. As Alan Greenspan described this week in a TV interview, people are a little “screwy” from time to time. Which means they don’t necessarily go along with your central planning, no matter how good you think it is.
And yet, economists insist that if they are allowed to monkey with an economy they can make it better. This is occasionally true. Said occasion is when they have already messed it up. Then, by withdrawing some of their planning and programmes, they may actually allow it to recover.
Otherwise, there is no example in history where force has been successfully applied to economies.
But that doesn’t stop the PhDs from trying. The jobs report showed about 60,000 jobs missing, that is, fewer than the same economists had projected. Now, the erring economists will most likely compound their error, by continuing to try to force the economy to do their bidding: increase jobs, and raise prices.
If they really wanted to increase employment, that would be easy enough. They would encourage the feds to withdraw some of the laws that bully employers (health insurance, EEOC threats, overtime etc), or the laws that make it easy for employees to remain unemployed (disability, unemployment compensation, food stamps). As far as we know, those things are not on the table.
What is on the table is more QE.
With regards to that, the poles of possibility are these: 1. QE does nothing important. If this were so, there would be no reason to keep it. 2. QE is essential to the economy. If this were so, they can’t get rid of it, no matter what the jobs report says.
Most likely, QE lies somewhere in between, perhaps lost in the horse-latitudes, It probably has little effect on the real economy. That is why the jobs report is so disappointing. But it probably has a great effect on the financial economy. That’s why the Dow sets new record highs almost every session.
The Fed is probably stuck with QE. Were it to stop, the stock market and the wealth effect that the PhDs have been aiming for would turn quickly into a poverty effect. Janet Yellen couldn’t stand it. She believes the Fed should use all its available weapons to force the economy to do what it wants. She won’t be able to stand by, dagger in hand, when the market turns its back on her. Instead, she will stab.
And the Fed that lived by the sword of QE, will probably die by it too.
• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here.
Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do
New to MoneyWeek?
Welcome, and thank you for visiting us.
Here at MoneyWeek, our aim is simple. To give you intelligent and enjoyable commentary on the most important financial stories of the week, and show you how to profit from them.
If you've enjoyed what you've read so far, we've got something you'll definitely be interested in.
Every week day, Monday to Friday, we send out a thought provoking and often controversial email called the Daily Reckoning. In it, we try to figure out the markets and how current economical events are shaping the world we live in. If you're interested in investment opportunities and the markets, we think you should be reading it…
With your permission, I'd like to send you the Daily Reckoning for FREE.
We hope you enjoy your stay on the site.
Editor, The Daily Reckoning