Don’t destroy the nation state, say voters

It is “always difficult to distil the many and varied messages that electorates send politicians into a single story”, says The Times; even more so when the electorate is spread across 28 nations. Whichever way you look at the result of last week’s European elections, they were “terrible” for integration.

From The National Front in France to Syriza in Greece, far-right nationalist and hard-left parties, who won a third of the seats in the EU parliament, delivered the same verdict: they do not like the direction the EU is taking.

The response will be informed by the “distinct and incompatible” visions of the future of Europe that leaders hold. Some, including David Cameron, see “the drift towards federal power as the source of the EU’s lack of legitimacy” (decisions are taken at EU level, with no real say from Europe’s citizens).

Others believe that what is needed is greater integration and federalism so that the EU “functions in a more effective and streamlined way”.

The real danger is that nothing will happen, says Gideon Rachman in the FT. The main business at this week’s EU summit is likely to be which insider gets to be head of the European Commission. Serious adjustments to policy are “just too hard” to agree on.

But this “cannot be allowed to happen”. The anti-establishment parties may be very divided, but they “do share a common theme: the strong belief that the EU has become too powerful at the expense of the nation state”.

To say that the vote was actually about immigration or the economy and not about Europe is to “miss the point”. Controlling borders and national finances are two of the “basic functions” of the nation state, and both have been “largely ceded to the EU”.

The challenge for EU leaders now is to see if they can restore some national democratic control over these areas without actually dismantling the union itself. The results will help Cameron to win the argument for change, says The Times.

If re-elected next year, he has pledged to renegotiate Britain’s relationship with Europe. “We need an approach that recognises that Brussels has got too big, too bossy, too interfering,” Cameron said. “It should be nation states wherever possible and Europe only where necessary.”

  • Bluebird

    It’s a relief to see voters everywhere waking up to the fact that the EU is increasingly beginning to look like the old bureaucratic Soviet Union, and if it keeps on going the way it is now it will end up like the old Soviet Union, taking 65 years of peace in Europe with it.

66% off newsstand price

12 issues (and much more) for just £12

That’s right. We’ll give you 12 issues of MoneyWeek magazine, complete access to our exclusive web articles, our latest wealth building reports and videos as well as our subscriber-only email… for just £12.

That’s just £1 per week for Britain’s best-selling financial magazine.

Click here to take advantage of our offer

Britain is leaving the European Union. Donald Trump is reducing America’s role in global markets. Both will have profound consequences for you as an investor.

MoneyWeek analyses the critical issues facing British investors on a weekly basis. And, unlike other publications, we provide you with the solutions to help you turn a situation to your financial advantage.

Take up our offer today, and we’ll send you three of our most important investment reports:

All three of these reports are yours when you take up our 12 issues for £12 offer today.

MoneyWeek has been advising private British investors on what to do with their money since 2000. Our calls over that period have enabled our readers to both make and save a great deal of money – hence our position as the UK’s most-trusted investment publication.

Click here to subscribe for just £12