Cameron’s ‘embarrassing retreat’ over immigration

David Cameron had to “beat an embarrassing retreat” last week after 86 Tory MPs voted against the government over immigration, says Andrew Grice in The Independent.

Cameron had to rely on Labour and Liberal Democrat votes to beat the rebels, who backed an amendment tabled by Tory MP Dominic Raab aimed at stopping foreign prisoners using the right to a family life (enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights) to stay in Britain. It was defeated by 241 votes to 97.

Lawyers had advised Home Secretary Theresa May that the measure was “incompatible” with the Convention and could result in legal challenges and fewer deportations.

To avoid annoying the rebels, Downing Street ordered ministers to abstain on the grounds that, while Cameron supported the move, he feared it was illegal and unworkable.

May was also accused of trying to “buy off” the rebels with a last-minute amendment to strip foreign-born terrorist suspects of British citizenship, which was approved, says the BBC.

This episode reveals the government to be “a prisoner of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)”, says Ross Clark in The Times. Raab’s amendment won cross-party support.

And Cameron presumably still shares his view that “British democracy would be better off without the ECHR and the Human Rights Act”, which incorporates the Convention into British law. After all, Cameron’s 2010 manifesto promised to scrap the Human Rights Act and replace it “with a British Bill of Rights”. The public agrees.

A recent YouGov poll found that 55% were in favour, and only 24% wished to remain within it. The ECHR, which combines a “fundamentalist approach to individuals’ rights with a complete disregard for democratic will”, has become a “millstone around our necks”.

Cameron’s “hysterically devoted supporters” did him no favours by claiming his leadership had been fatally undermined, says Janet Daley in The Daily Telegraph. Voters may not like divided parties, but neither do they want MPs to be “unquestioning automatons”.

If “conscience and principle are still to be valued”, then disagreement, even rebellion, will happen. The real danger comes from the “pernicious fudged compromises and enforced consensus which make voters feel that no one really speaks for them”.

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Party's over for Putin

The only portfolio safe from Russia's rout

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues

Hedge fund manager Hugh Hendry: 'It felt like the sun rose only to humiliate me'

In a series of three short videos, Merryn Somerset-Webb talks to Hugh Hendry, manager of the Eclectica hedge fund, about everything from China to the US, Europe, and Japan.


Which investment platform?

When it comes to buying shares and funds, there are several investment platforms and brokers to choose from. They all offer various fee structures to suit individual investing habits.
Find out which one is best for you.


19 December 1932: BBC World Service begins

The first royal Christmas message by George V gave the fledgling World Service an early boost six days after it was founded in 1932.