Cameron is right to scrap for Britain

David Cameron’s journey from “human rights champion to business pragmatist has been spectacular”, says Kerry Brown in The Guardian. In 2011 Cameron took the Chinese premier to task about human rights abuses; in 2012 he met the Dalai Lama, which resulted in the UK being “relegated to the diplomatic deep freeze”. This week, he only wants to talk trade. No wonder he is being taken to task for kowtowing to the Chinese.

He should have been “more nuanced and pragmatic” right from the start, says the Financial Times. “All governments face a challenge reconciling trade ambitions with human rights concerns when dealing with authoritarian states.” But the UK-China trade relationship will, in any case, have “limited prospects while Britain remains ambivalent about its place in the EU”. He says he wants to “champion an EU-China trade deal”, but he is the only European leader who has pledged to hold a referendum on quitting the EU.

We should stop criticising Cameron, says Dan Hodges in The Daily Telegraph. “Britain is fighting for her economic life” and leading a trade mission of 131 business representatives to one of the world’s economic powerhouses is exactly what he should be doing. We need to be “scrapping” for every competitive advantage we can. We can’t just stick a “Made in Britain” sticker on our products and expect everyone to start buying them.

And there is some evidence that these trade missions work, says Ben Chu in The Independent. During his visit to China in October, the chancellor, George Osborne, gave the green light to allowing Chinese firms to invest in the Hinkley Point nuclear plant. This week, Standard Chartered and the Agricultural Bank of China signed an agreement to start renminbi clearing services in the UK. Both deals had long been in gestation, but the missions may have brought matters to a head. The Chinese preference for serious “face time” before doing deals makes these trips valuable, as does the fact that firms can associate themselves with the prime mnister.

These endless trade missions are nothing more than a “ludicrous” perk, says Simon Jenkins in The Guardian. Britain will sell to China when its goods and services merit it. If Cameron really wanted to help trade, he would ease the Home Office visa barrier that does “more than anything to stifle Britain’s most promising real export to China, which is tourism”. Instead, that industry must “sit at home like Cinderella”.

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

ScreenHunter_01 Mar. 25 09.51

New to MoneyWeek?

Ed Bowsher Editor Money Week

Welcome, and thank you for visiting us.

Here at MoneyWeek, our aim is simple. To give you intelligent and enjoyable commentary on the most important financial stories of the week, and tell you how to profit from them.

If you've enjoyed what you've read so far, I've got something you'll definitely be interested in.

Every working day the MoneyWeek team sends out a hard-hitting email, 'Money Morning', giving you a rundown of the latest financial events, and revealing what you should do to maximise profits and head off losses…

And with your permission, I'd like to send you Money Morning for FREE.

To sign-up enter your email address below.

We hope you enjoy your stay on the site. Good luck with your investments!

Ed Bowsher,
Digital Managing Editor, MoneyWeek

(No thanks)

Because these emails are completely free, we do have to fund them with advertising. Occasionally we will send you promotional emails, however we will never give, sell or rent your email address to any other companies.For more information, please see our Privacy policy.

One Response

  1. 05/12/2013, Boris MacDonut wrote

    No.Cameron is wrong. China is a moral issue and he has misjudged it badly. The UK is a strong and successful economy without China. China still accounts for less of our trade than even Ireland or Belgium. We should stick with our friends in India, Bangladesh and Malaysia and make a clear point to the rest of the World that trade with the Chinese government is unacceptable.
    Before anyone jumps down my throat. Being happy to greet Chinese tourists is not the same as dealing with the Chinese government .The latter is a pariah and the former offers hope that civilised people will grow a pair and challenge their foul leaders.

Comment on this article

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Plugging into the future

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 3 FREE Issues
Shale gas 'fracking' promises to transform Britain's energy market. Find out what it is, what it means, and how to invest.

More from MoneyWeek

The problem with the Bank of England

Fracking: Nine reasons not to get carried away

Five small-cap stocks worth a flutter

This Dutch company could help us tame floods