How to measure the real rate of inflation? Look at school fees

What is inflation actually running at? Most people will tell you that their personal inflation rate appears to be running way higher than the official CPI numbers, and if you look at the individual prices you pay on a daily basis it does seem unlikely that price inflation in the UK could really be running at under 3%.

It is also true that the index the government use sometimes changes (let’s not forget than only a few years ago the RPI was the standard measure of rises in  UK prices – no one ever mentioned the CPI) and that the baskets of goods that are used to make up the index change constantly.

In the US, for example, the way in which inflation is calculated has been changed more than 20 times in the last 35 years. According to John Williams of Shadowstats.com, if it were measured as it was in 1990 it would now be around 5% (the official numbers today have it at 2.2%). And in the UK we are currently discussing changing the calculation of our RPI.

This all makes it hard to really compare where we are with where we were. So what can we look at if we really want to see how much the prices of the things we buy every day are really rising? I wonder if private school fees might be one thing to think about.

Now before you all go nuts in the comments section about elitism, I will point out that this idea has nothing to do with who pays for it and how, it is simply to do with what it costs to create a school community. After all, a school needs and uses all the things most communities need and use. It hires staff. It uses energy for heating lighting and transport. It buys food. It buys computer equipment and furniture. It buys sporting equipment and it pays for building maintenance and insurance – just like all other communities.

The difference between a private school and other communities is that these costs can’t be much fudged, delayed or farmed out to other organisations. The school has to put a cost price on its services every year. So regardless of who ends up using the community in question, the price is interesting.

So what is inflation if you look at it this way? It is currently running at 5% and has been almost twice the rate of reported inflation since 2002, according to a report from Lloyds TSB (68% vs 37%). It is also worth noting that in 2002 the average private school fee was equivalent to 27% of average earnings. Now it is 35%. That gives you some measure of just how much real earnings have fallen in the last decade.
 
I asked Jonathan Asante of First State if he had a proxy in mind for inflation when I interviewed him yesterday (more on this next week). He does. And it’s a good one.

He agrees it is tricky to find one for individual countries, but for a steer on global inflation he suggests looking at the difference between the rises in volumes and the rises in revenues at big multinational companies. These are the companies that have pricing power in most markets and are therefore more likely than most to pass on all the cost rises they see. And if you do that, at what rate does it seem that global currencies are being debased? Around 5%. It’s a number that appears to make some sense.

49 Responses

  1. 1

    26/10/2012, Ellen wrote

    Inflation is the thing that everybody seems to expect to get worse and it is already much higher than is being admitted probably as a result of the debasement of our currency that you have referred to in recent articles. But people are being squeezed so hard right now that, unless we have some wage inflation, it is difficult to see how inflation can be allowed to ravage through the whole economy. However, the rich have done very well out of the monetary manipulation we have seen in recent year precisely because they do not hold their wealth in cash. So as these are the people who would be looking to use the more expensive private schools for their children, I am not surprised prices at these schools are going up. I would expect their fees to rise faster than the rate of inflation, maybe?

  2. 2

    26/10/2012, crazy tony wrote

    This seems to be an argument *against* including private schools in inflation figures. If it "hires staff. It uses energy for heating lighting and transport. It buys food. It buys computer equipment and furniture. It buys sporting equipment and it pays for building maintenance and insurance" ....... Then it sounds like every other business to me, adds nothing to the figures.

    The main difference here is that private school places are very limited. So surely the price of private schooling reflects simply the greater demand over supply of places.

    Havent the rich have got richer in the recession and are thus easy to squeeze for fat fees.

  3. 3

    26/10/2012, Guy wrote

    Hi Merryn,

    I like this idea; it's an interesting parallel to draw. I do wonder though what the impact of the facilities 'arms race' between such schools is and whether it might skew the data - for communities, such spending would be discretionary whereas for a private school it might be a cost of staying in the game (no pun intended!).

    Regards,

    Guy

  4. 4

    26/10/2012, Jim wrote

    I think the "Private School Index" is a good idea, though I agree that rich parents and supply/demand may allow them to charge more. Perhaps average student debt at point of graduation might go into the pot to even things out.

  5. 5

    26/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    This is tosh. Only 6.4% of parents ever have to consider/worry about toff school fees. Toff schools do not have to run pubs, or churches, or charities or builder's merchants ,or farms. They do not mine primary resources or provide actuarial services,nor pensions nor professional sports teams. Private schools are so removed from the norm as to make this article a total nonsense.
    This is elitist . Not because Merryn insists she is trying not to be, but because of the ridiculously limited cul-de-sac of experience it hails from. I, for one, am offended.

  6. 6

    26/10/2012, Critic Al Rick wrote

    @ 5. Boris

    Er, did you mean "offensive"?

  7. 7

    26/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #6 Rick. No. Offended.

  8. 8

    27/10/2012, Natalie wrote

    I think the Private Schools Index, which costs out a community living in this country is a good enough analogy for the cost of living.

    The no. of private school places has been gradually declining since the end of the days of the Empire. Many public schools have closed - they are very much dictated by the forces of supply & demand.

    As much as 1/3 -1/2 of the boarding places are sold to the parents of foreign children - many coming from Hong Kong & Europe. For their size, the boarding schools at least, contribute to this country's export figures.

    @ 5. Boris. I have bought dance, music & swimming lessons for my children. Why is this elitist?

  9. 9

    27/10/2012, Ian wrote

    #5 Boris.

    I think you've missed Merryn's point. Private schools use many services (obviously not all) in the community. Eg if they build a new classroom they will contract a builder who will source goods from a builders merchant. They will probably contribute to staff pensions etc. Merryn's point is that the private school index may be a better index than the politically manipulated RPI & CPI, which it probably is.

    Also how is a professional sports team "normal" and a private school not? I don't think the Premier League has much in common with the wider economy.

  10. 10

    27/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #8 Natalie. Merryn is referring to public school fees and their impact on the elite , not extra-curicular lessons for the masses.
    #9 Ian. Who mentioned the Premier League? I do not accept that this index is a reasonable microcosm of the "real" world. It is abit too like the articles in the Sunday Times about "typical" housebuyers. You know the ones. 30 year olds buying a barn conversion in the Cotswolds on a £500k mortgage with kids called Jocasta and Perseus. People the Times journalists consider ordinary.

  11. 11

    27/10/2012, Ellen wrote

    @Boris. 10. Recognising and challenging your own prejudices is important. Then you can honestly say you are trying to be objective. I won't be feeling sorry for the parents of the children in Eton over this. Far from it - as they are getting an Eton education to give them the edge over the majority of children including my own.

    But the point being made in this article is merely making the correlation between school fees and inflation. Personally, I think those that use private schools have done so well with recent monetary policy, due to the fact that asset prices remain artificially high and the currency is being debased, that they have never been better off. The rich hold their wealth in assets and the mainstream have a deposit account and get paid in currency! So I think school fees, range rovers, boats etc are costing more because these asset rich people are worth more and thus, are prepared to pay more.

  12. 12

    27/10/2012, NeutronWarp9 wrote

    Fear not dear Merryn, Boris was nuts way before you wrote this article and is offended by a wayward glance from a passing dog.
    This proxy argument might have legs if private school fees were simply a function of costs AND the if basket of goods and services a private school purchases reflects the same items used by wider society. However, neither is true.
    Private school fees can reflect many things, from the level of demand for places from ambitious and/or fearful parents to the need for a new pool.
    Natalie (8), your classes are training your kids for Club Ibiza; not elitist at all.

  13. 13

    27/10/2012, Romford Dave wrote

    The same could be said of any of the proxy indicators Neutron, be it the Big Mac, the Tall Latte or even the Mars Bar index, albeit the latter somewhat sullied by the Ms Faithfull incident.

    Yes we know that they're not always an 100% accurate reflection, but they are a good indicator of how truthful official figures are, as most Argentinian Big Mac consumers could testify.

    Very amusing dog tale though :)

  14. 14

    27/10/2012, Natalie wrote

    @10 Boris. @12 NeutronWarp9

    Boris - Merrryn is not.

    NeutronWarp9 - No, they are not.

  15. 15

    29/10/2012, THE COMMON MAN wrote

    yes it is elitist-not a good measure when so few people can afford them!what's wrong with cost of heating/lighting a house,or a loaf of bread or a pint of mile or a pint of beer ....might as well make it the cost of new duckhouses/chickenhouses....bah!humbug!

  16. 16

    30/10/2012, Andrew H wrote

    I've just had a read of the comments and I cannot help but laugh.

    MW publish an article with regard to measuring inflation that also mentions "private schools" and the central planners among MW's readership work themselves into a rabid frenzy and begin posting bizarre comments.

    I find it difficult to understand why the mention of parents educating their own children as they see fit, using their own time and resources causes such controversy.

  17. 17

    30/10/2012, Andrew H wrote

    I also have to laugh at Boris's comments @5:

    " Toff schools do not have to run pubs, or churches, or charities or builder's merchants ,or farms. They do not mine primary resources or provide actuarial services,nor pensions "

    Where do I start with this?

    - I would rather hope a school I sent my children to wouldn't run a public house on the campus.

    - Many schools are funded by charitable donation and are registered charities

    - Large schools will have some form of facilities management and therefore in house building and maintenance services, and quite possibly a pension fund too.

    - As for services, if educating a child is not a service, what is it?

    Is Boris also saying that schools are not subject to large costs in food, energy and transport?

  18. 18

    30/10/2012, JT wrote

    @AndrewH 15 & 16

    Boris likes to spend his time attempting to wind-up MW readers by barking confrontationally at all and sundry. But I can probably save you some time by saying that once you've read two or three of his posts, you've read them all. That said, it is fun to watch his arguments being destroyed by the likes of Ellen et al, as regularly happens whenever I've taken the time to read their exchanges.

  19. 19

    30/10/2012, Romford Dave wrote

    I'm not sure Boris' arguments are destroyed JT, infuriating yes and occasionally controversial but always argued from an ideological perspective that's the polar opposite from those choosing to be the most ardent of capitalists.

    If only he didn't come across quite so smug...............!

    Fortunately a budding entrepreneur has set up a web site to deal with this very occassion!

    http://www.thesmugalert.com/submit

    A fantastic example of capitalism in action, where the efforts of every contributor is used to compile a book that will socialise an issue and undoubtably be purchased by all those who contributed to it - making the author the prime candidate for inclusion in Volume 2.

  20. 20

    31/10/2012, Andrew H wrote

    @18, Romford Dave,

    I find Boris's comments overly emotive, prone to dragging the debate off at an unrelated tangent, and not really borne out by facts and figures.

    His comment regarding "Toff Schools" is a prime example of this, and ironically also something Boris would describe as bigoted if the phrase was aimed at a different group of people i.e. the working class, or ethnic minorities.

  21. 21

    31/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #15 to #19. I make no apology for taking a confrontational attitude towards Toffs and their priviliges. I come from a humble background and so champion those without the loud and braying voices of the Toffs. They have plenty of supporters and clout,they do not need my empathy.
    You choose to send your kids to these ivory towers to mix with and meet the "right sort" to make connections, not to be educated. It is done to mark you out as a clan or gang and I have always seen it as elitist because it is.
    Oh and Eton does have a pub,but my point was Toff schools are not part of the real world they are deliberately set apart. They are divisive and perpetuated by those who seek to presume they are in some way better......and you have the cheek to say I am smug. Do you say that about everyone who disagrees with you?

  22. 22

    31/10/2012, Andrew H wrote

    @20, Boris

    So labelling and making wild accusations of anyone who you think belongs to a specific group of people is not bigoted?

    As for the rest of your comment I'm not sure what you point is, have you asked why people send their children to schools outside those provided by the state?

  23. 23

    31/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #21 Andrew. For that specific group, the Toffs,the accusations are justified. Criticising a rival or enemy is not bigotry Andrew, it is opposition.
    On your second point. I explained why people like you send their offspring to elitist schools. It is partly to reassure the parents they belong in a certain caste and partly to buy a headstart in networking with other members of the gang. At worst it is a sneering gesture to seperate from people seen as inferior, not just the other schoolkids ,but even their teachers.
    "Special people" seek special treatment and to cite private schools as a microcosm of the modern economy is trite piffle.

  24. 24

    31/10/2012, Andrew H wrote

    @20, Boris,

    Have you not considered that state provided education is divisive?

    In that the state deprives people of their means in order to fund state education services, such that parents no longer have enough surplus left to choose how and where their children are educated, which in turn makes the provision of privately funded education something that only a few are able to afford.

    I would also argue that rates paid to state educators put a floor under the education market, and educators working outside state schools will be paid at least what their contemporaries are paid who work for the state, and therefore education would be cheaper without state interference.

  25. 25

    31/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #23. Andrew. Suggesting teachers are overpaid is off topic.
    The state also deprives people of their means and then goes and builds roads so they no longer have a choice in how they get from A to B other than use the wretched state provided tarmac. So much better to let everyone choose their own route. Would roads be cheaper without state interference? I fear you suffer from an ideologically that has not been thought through.

  26. 26

    31/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #23. Andrew. Suggesting teachers are overpaid is off topic.
    The state also deprives people of their means and then goes and builds roads so they no longer have a choice in how they get from A to B other than use the wretched state provided tarmac. So much better to let everyone choose their own route. Would roads be cheaper without state interference? I fear you suffer from an ideologically that has not been thought through.

  27. 27

    31/10/2012, Andrew H wrote

    @22, Boris,

    No "Toff" is a derogatory label, similar terms reserved for other groups of people, as well as broad accusations against such groups, are not tolerated, regardless of the means or peer support of such groups.

    You've elucidated your "theory" as to why people choose certain schools, not the actual rationalisations that people make when making this decision.

    As for separating people, that's something the state forces upon us, and something you seem to support particularly given your penchant for labels and sweeping remarks.

  28. 28

    31/10/2012, Andrew H wrote

    @25, Boris,

    Would transport be cheaper without state interference? I would argue that it would be.

    If you look at any other market in which the government interferes there is ample evidence of cost inflation.

    For example the state pays minimum rates of housing benefit for various type of property (LHA rates), and a quick look on any property website will show that rents are not available below that rate.

    Another example, social care, the state pays a minimum hourly care rate for people requiring care (direct payments), and a quick look at the local market shows not a single care company offering lower rates than that paid for by the state.

    Have you ever self funded your own health care? I have, and an appointment to see a consultant will cost exactly what the same consultant would charge the NHS.

  29. 29

    01/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #25 Andrew. Don't be so touchy. Toff is not rude , it is slang and at worst only mildly derogatory. It comes from the tufts of Gold that gentry wore at medieval Oxbridge, specifically to let others know they were special. So in a way ,they started it.
    If I was to go into the selfish little "rationalisations" that toffs, and those who yearn to mix with them, make when choosing to blow up to £30k a year on an elitist education I fear you may blow a gasket.
    #26 How utterly ludicruous. You would argue black is white. You have seriously said, on a public forum, that you think transport ( I said roads) would be cheaper without state interference. Would there really be any roads at all,other than a few between large cities and reserved for the toffs, like the mooted new M-way lanes?

  30. 30

    01/11/2012, Romford Dave wrote

    Definition of two recently used four letter words.

    Pleb - noun, derogatory

    An ordinary person, especially one from the lower social classes.

    Origin: Mid 17th century: originally as plural plebs, from Latin plebs 'the common people'. Later a shortened form of plebeian


    Toff - noun, derogatory

    A rich or upper-class person.

    Origin: Mid 19th century: perhaps an alteration of tuft, used to denote a gold tassel worn on the cap by titled undergraduates at Oxford and Cambridge.


    The late Peter Bayliss's portrayal of Dennis Dunstable's dad in the film version of Please Sir exemplified the ignorance of such users, a more recent example being provided by Andrew Mitchell, albeit batting for the other side.


  31. 31

    01/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    The word Toff is used in the UK media on a daily basis. If it were rude MW would ban my comments. Longmans dictionary defines it as an informal word for the upper class. The OED as slang for a distinguished or well dressed person.Wikipedia as slang and mildly derogatory. It is my intention to be mildly derogatory about those who see themselves as special,so I stand by the use of the word Toff. It is not ignorant. It is a calculated slur.

  32. 32

    01/11/2012, THE COMMON MAN wrote

    anyway back to more important issues-I used to pay 1 shilling and tenpence for a pint of lager(about 9p in new money) back in the early 70s- now its £3-50!

    School fees are relevant for only a minority,and its not essential,so its a poor choice in my opinion.

  33. 33

    01/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #30 Common Man. The price of ale is a much better guide. Though I venture you are not referring to the same alehouse for the 9p and the £3.50 pint, nor the same beer or ambience.
    A new pub opened near my abode in 1998 selling Bass at £1.60 ,the same pub sells the same beer at £3.20 today.A doubling in 14 years. Pork scratchings were 40p ,now 90p. meat products seem to have out done booze. But of course the MW types won't see the beer and pork scratchings index as typical. Maybe Prosecco and taramasalata would be better.

  34. 34

    02/11/2012, Romford Dave wrote

    The pint of ale is a better guide, but only if you're looking at it through beer goggles.

    The official ONS RPI figure for 1998 to 2012 gives an increase of 69.7%, whereas your preferred beer and pork proxy shows a 100% increase based on anecdotal evidence from a pub you use. The private school fee proxy or 'prosecco and taramasalata proxy' if you prefer, of doubling official RPI rates equates to a 139.4% increase, which is closer to the inflated price THE COMMON MAN is actually paying for his £3.50 pint.

    As ironic as it may seem and as the original article implied, private school fee increases are more indicative of the inflation the common man (and woman) is having to suffer, regardless of any individual prejudices or lost cause championing.






  35. 35

    02/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #32 Dave .You will notice my pork scratchings are up 125%, so a weight ee average of 112%. Common Man was referring to inflation since about 1970, not 1998. You say overall inflation is under 70% since 1998 but school fees are up 140% and are more like "reality". The optional costs of a small group of wealthy folk are more typical of common inflation. No. It is simply a right wing attempt to justify blabber about "real" inflation rates. Why not look at an average family in an average house ,buying a typical basket of groceries etc... Surely that is the best proxy.

  36. 36

    02/11/2012, JT wrote

    @Boris 22

    "Criticising a rival or enemy is not bigotry Andrew, it is opposition."

    You are directing your comments at a group, Boris, not at an individual, and that make all the difference. I'd invite you to consider what you've written and then look up the word "stereotype". You might then reflect on whether the tone of your contributions above are appropriate.

  37. 37

    02/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #34 What? You cannot see a group as a rivals? I think the point is the group referred to see themselves as of special note and thus take such exception to being criticised. The self same group who happily accuse single mothers or "benefit cheats" or any number of minority groups of dragging our economy down and being an onerous burden on their wallets. No JT, the tone of comments is just fine. The world is polarising and we all have to decide which camp we fall into. I have chosen to lambast the snobbish,sorry if it offends you.

  38. 38

    02/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #34 What? You cannot see a group as a rivals? I think the point is the group referred to see themselves as of special note and thus take such exception to being criticised. The self same group who happily accuse single mothers or "benefit cheats" or any number of minority groups of dragging our economy down and being an onerous burden on their wallets. No JT, the tone of comments is just fine. The world is polarising and we all have to decide which camp we fall into. I have chosen to lambast the snobbish,sorry if it offends you.

  39. 39

    02/11/2012, Andrew H wrote

    @27, Boris,

    Bigotry starts with assigning a derogatory label to a group of people, proceeded by then levelling negative accusations against all perceived members of such a group, regardless of the truth of such an accusation, or the behaviour of each individual perceived as belonging to such a group, with the on going justification of "What's the problem! They're only a , and they're awful because they Y" (e.g. X being Kulak, Homosexual, Jewish, etc, and Y being "Profit from famine", "are immoral", "take indigenous jobs").

    In your case Boris it is "Toffs", and various bizarre accusations such as "their loud and braying voices".

    You would be the first person to complain if the word "toff" was replaced with a deragtory statement levelled at a group of people you would associate with being "working class".

    You refuse to accept your own hypocrisy and bizarrely try to justify it with almost transparent bigotry.

  40. 40

    02/11/2012, Romford Dave wrote

    Boris, your weighted average would be 105% not 112%, given that pork scratchings formed only a fifth of your beer & pork index at its conception, but that's arguing over semantics and everyone knows that there's lies, damned lies and statistics.

    The thrust of the article is that the official figures differ markedly from the reality people find in what they regularly buy. I've no idea why you perceive it as right wing blabber?

    If anything your own beer and pork index supports the posher version of actual inflation compared to what the ONS has consistently put out whatever the colour of the Government.

    Even your average family in an average house, buying a typical basket of groceries suggestion is questionable whether it's any better as a proxy than another, given the difficulty in defining the dynamic of an average family at any given time, which probably explains why the ONS chooses not to use it (more irony).

    Inflation is the real enemy of the people.

  41. 41

    02/11/2012, Andrew wrote

    @27, Boris,

    So you have spoken to every single person that has chosen to privately educate their child, and you can categorically state each and every one of those people seeks such services "to sneer at those they see as inferior"?

    On the issue of transport, history doesn't back your assertion that "there would only be a few roads reserved for Toffs", the rail network was constructed privately, some 23,000 miles worth of track, used by all manner of different people.

    Rather ironically it was the government, through a distinct lack of maintenance, that ruined the rail infrastucture during WWII, and then closed appox. 4,000 miles of tracks under the Beeching Cuts.

    I try to argue with the fact Boris, rather than with rhetoric.

  42. 42

    02/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #37 Andrew. I am patently not a bigot anhave not mentioned any such groups as the Jewish. I am just keen to defend those who get steam rollered by the toffs.
    #38 Dave. But I have 4 packets of scratchings with each pint. The dental bills are horrendous.
    #39 Andrew. I never mentioned transport, I said roads. The rail network does not amount to a road. I'm sure some folk have genuine reasons for wanting an elitist school for their kids but by and large it is used as a status symbol, like aMulberry handbag or a Maserati. A security blanket for Toffs and the aspirational.

  43. 43

    02/11/2012, Romford Dave wrote

    Canada has a treasure trove of equal opportunities for the dentally challenged Boris, have you ever considered relocating?

    I know lots have, but that's usually been wishful thinking on their part ;)

    http://www.dental-tribune.com/articles/content/id/9864/scope/news/region/canada

  44. 44

    02/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #41 Dave. You've gone to the root of the issue. Not just filling in, but drilling down. How some people have the nerve to ply their false hoods amazes me. To crown it all I will fight tooth and nail to support the disadvantaged. You should have a plaque erected in your honour rather than the pasting you often receive in your brushes with the commentators on here.

  45. 45

    02/11/2012, JT wrote

    @Boris 36

    "The self same group who happily accuse single mothers or "benefit cheats" or any number of minority groups of dragging our economy down and being an onerous burden on their wallets."

    By my moral compass Boris, two wrongs don't make a right. Morover, by displaying the same behaviour as those you criticise so stridently, your hypocrosy simply destroys your own credibility.

  46. 46

    04/11/2012, THE COMMON MAN wrote

    well I think it would be useful if the "toffs" at Moneyweek devised their own inflation index along the lines of the "big mac" index.
    dont make it optional stuff like school fees,but make it the nitty gritty that has to be paid.My suggestions

    1/price of heating an average house-gas and electric.
    2/loaf of bread
    3/tube of toothpaste
    4/cost of getting hammered to stop thinking about how much poorer you are thanks to the politicians and bankers.

  47. 47

    05/11/2012, Andrew H wrote

    @44, The Common Man,

    Ok, private schools do not consume gas, electricity, and bread, not to mention all manner of different services and products?

    I would point out that your measure of inflation is pretty useless, namely a major reason for the housing and credit bubbles in the UK was that the costs of accommodation were not included in the measure of inflation, which was used as a guide for setting interest rates, and a basis by which banks and financial companies set rates of interest on loans and mortgages to consumers.

  48. 48

    13/11/2012, Romford Dave wrote

    Economists were shocked that tuition fees had the biggest impact on the inflation rate this month.

    The irony is delicious.

  49. 49

    14/11/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    #46 Well said Dave. It is staggering isn't it? This has been in the pipeline for months ,even a year or two and they did not see it coming. But I still expect inflation to be at or near 1% this time next year.

Commenting on this article closed