Swindlers everywhere!

Not much movement in the markets yesterday, so let’s turn to more important things.

Our friend Dylan Grice, an analyst with Société Générale, says he is more worried about the future now than at any time in his career.

His worry is not just the failure of the financial system, but a breakdown in the whole society. “Monetary debasement leads to social debasement”, he says.

We thought that society was already debased enough, but Dylan thinks it will get a lot worse. Once you begin to take liberties with the money, people begin to take liberties in other ways. When people can no longer trust the currency, trust in the whole of society, and in one another, begins to break down.

When the feds begin to cheat on the money, everyone else begins to cheat too. Here’s an item that came in yesterday. From Bloomberg:

Almost 2,400 people who received unemployment insurance in 2009 lived in households with annual incomes of $1 million or more, according to the Congressional Research Service.

The report was released after about 1.1 million people exhausted their jobless benefits during the second quarter of 2012, when more than 4.6 million filed initial unemployment claims. Eliminating those payments to high earners is one idea being considered as US lawmakers struggle to curb a projected $1.1 trillion deficit for the fiscal year that ended 30 September with the nationwide jobless rate at 8.1%. a “Sending millionaires unemployment checks is a case study in out-of-control spending,” US Senator Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, said in an email. “Providing welfare to the wealthy undermines the program for those who need it most while burdening future generations with senseless debt.”

The 2,362 people in millionaire homes represent 0.02% of the 11.3 million US tax filers who reported unemployment insurance income in 2009, according to the August report. Another 954,000 households earning more than $100,000 during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression also reported receiving unemployment benefits.

Coburn found that 18 households reporting an adjusted gross income that exceeded $10 million received an average unemployment benefit of $12,333 in 2009. The average benefit for 74 households earning between $5 million and $10 million was $18,351. The average household making $1 million or more received $11,113, or about 37 weeks of unemployment benefits.

Not that we’re criticising anyone. In their hearts, people are not really any more greedy or corrupt now than they ever were. But now, the whole system has gone sour.

When the money goes phoney, so goes everything else. Dylan Grice: “I am more worried than I have ever been about the clouds gathering today (which may be the most wonderful contrary indicator you could hope for…). I hope they pass without breaking, but I fear the defining feature of coming decades will be a Great Disorder of the sort which has defined past epochs and scarred whole generations.”

Want more evidence of ‘social debasement’? Dylan writes: “The 99% blame the 1%, the 1% blame the 47%, the private sector blames the public sector, the public sector returns the sentiment… the young blame the old, everyone blames the rich… yet few question the ideas behind government or central banks…”

We’ve been living through the largest hyperinflation in credit in history, he says. As we’ve pointed out many times, this programme is essentially a transfer programme, shifting assets from the middle classes to the rich.

We used the example of the WWII concentration camps and the gulags of the Soviet Union. Food was money there. And the closer you were to the source of the food, the more likely you were to survive. Even when rations were supposedly adequate for everyone, by the time they got to the people furthest from the kitchen, there was not enough to live on. Millions died.

Now, it’s the central banks and central governments who are handing out the food. Naturally, those closest to these institutions – the insiders, the Wall Streeters, the campaign contributors and the rich, generally – get the biggest portions. It is supposed to trickle down to the rest of society. But it never gets there.

Even Keynes himself recognised this effect: “By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.”

This monetary inflation, this credit inflation (not yet high levels of consumer price inflation – at least, not officially) is moving money to the stockholders and bondholders. The middle classes have made no progress in terms of income or net worth in nearly 20 years. And the poor are increasing with the highest number on food stamps in the US ever.

This is not the sort of thing that breeds social cohesion or communal happiness. Instead, it causes resentment, envy and mass cheating.

Get ready for it.

• Don’t miss Bill’s next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he’s written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares – you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

5 Responses

  1. 04/10/2012, Boris MacDonut wrote

    Leaving aside the fact that unemployed folk are patently not earning (I guess you really refer to their wealth not earnings) I calculate the total benefit paid to millionaires in the USA as $26.3million.I bety the admin’ necessary to cease this discrepancy would cost nearly as much.It is peanuts in the great scheme of things. But I agree it sends a message of mixed priorities and general incompetence.

  2. 04/10/2012, Millie Headband wrote

    The other side to this is that I have worked non-stop for over 40 years and have been sensible with my money and paid hundreds of thousands in tax and NI. I am being made redundant because of government policy; should I not be able to get a bit back? They will ask me if I have over £15k savings and I will say if I haven’t you should kick my backside and send me home for being a waster. So, I will get £70 a week or whatever job seekers allowance is and the lazy individual behind me who has never worked or contributed will get a house! Paying money to millionaires is not the problem; paying it to the feckless is!

  3. 05/10/2012, dr ray wrote

    Bill,
    I just put in a claim on my car insurance after someone snapped my mirror off. I have a pretty good income. Should the insurance company turn down my claim?

  4. 09/10/2012, Tall Tom wrote

    @dr. ray…You missed it. He was not decrying the fact that the Millionaires collected Unemployment Insurance.. He was decrying the fact that the Government wants to stop it.

    U.S. Senator Tom Colburn wants to stop it.

    In fact Bill Bonner goes on to write directly after his REPORT, “NOT that we are criticizing anyone.”

    One of the major problems with those that read is hat they ERRONEOUSLY BELIEVE that someone who reports SUPPORTS what he is REPORTING.

    That is NOT TRUE in EVERY CASE. I will report about topics which I do not support to EXPOSE them.

    Be a little more careful in how you discern what you read.

  5. 09/10/2012, dr ray wrote

    What have I missed Tall Tom?
    I was merely asking whether it is immoral for me to claim on my car insurance since I am a high earner and don’t actually need to. It would leave more for payouts to low earners who claim.
    Also should I offer to pay more for my shopping at Tescos this weekend? If I subsidize Tescos profits they can cut prices for poor people. Seems fair to me.

Commenting on this article closed

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Cheaper oil

Who benefits?

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues

Vote in the MoneyWeek Readers' Choice Awards

Vote for your favourite financial services companies in the inaugural MoneyWeek Awards, and you could win a year's subscription to MoneyWeek magazine. Find out more and vote here.


Which investment platform?

When it comes to buying shares and funds, there are several investment platforms and brokers to choose from. They all offer various fee structures to suit individual investing habits.
Find out which one is best for you.