On the road to Damascus

As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?” “Who are you, Lord?” Saul asked. “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,” he replied. “Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.” The men travelling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound, but did not see anyone. Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So they led him by the hand into Damascus. For three days he was blind, and did not eat or drink anything. - Acts 9:3–9, NIV

Yesterday, it was back to school, back to work, and back to worrying about our money. But nothing was proven yesterday, no hint of what lies ahead unless what lies ahead is nothing.

Yesterday, the Dow rose a little and gold recovered to over $1,400.

Our guess is that all the major markets have changed direction.

Gold is now going up.

Stocks and bonds are now going down.

How do we know? You can look at the charts. You can check the sentiment levels. You can study the fundamentals, examine earnings, or even gaze at the stars. You can find ‘reasons’ for a major trend change almost anywhere you want to look.

But the biggest reason is this: The Pharisees have taken over. Their goal is neither peace nor prosperity. It is to preserve their own power and status, and their wealth, at whatever cost.

As to peace, you have only to read the headlines. Syria has never posed any threat to the United States of America. Few Americans can find Damascus on the map. Fewer still would care to do so. The city is best known as the place to which the Jew, Saul, was headed when he became the Christian Paul, allegedly in about 35AD.

The Bible tells us that Paul was radicalised. He turned on the Pharisees. He abandoned the insiders and the zombies. He wanted real change. Revolutionary change, the kind of change you get after the system falls apart or blows up.

And now, the headlines tell us that the US may be on the road to Damascus too. But like Saul or Paul?

Syria’s sovereign government is a sworn enemy to America’s supposed enemy – terrorists. Yet, in solemn chutzpah, the US Security Council met to discuss ways to attack not the terrorists, but the government. Yes, the US now plans an act of war against yet another country in the Middle East, and another intervention of unknown cost and uncertain duration.


Bill Bonner on markets, economics & the madness of crowds

To sign-up to Bill's free daily email just enter your email address below

Because these emails are completely free, we do have to fund them with advertising. Occasionally we will send you promotional emails, however we will never give, sell or rent your email address to any other companies.For more information, please see our Privacy policy.


Some would ask, “haven’t they learned anything from Iraq and Afghanistan?” But the questioners would be people who haven’t learned anything themselves. America’s military adventures have nothing to do with national security. They are now the exploits of a Pharisee industry, intended to protect the zombies from spending cuts and radical reformers.

And here, at the head of the war hounds is the New York Times, out in front, baying for more bombs.

Bomb Syria, even if it is illegal”, says one editorial headline.

And the Wall Street Journal tells us that war is too important to be left to the people’s representatives in Congress, as the constitution demands: ”The reason [for Congress to] authorize the use of force is not to save this President from embarrassment. It is to rescue American credibility and strategic interests from this most feckless of presidents.”

Rescue America’s credibility? Save its strategic interests? Pharisee talk, pure and simple. Empty and self-serving. Designed to preserve the status quo.

The Financial Times: “The moral case for intervention in Syria”.

And here comes The Telegraph: “Syria: the moral case for military intervention is now overwhelming”.

The purported reason for the attack is to punish the Assad regime for using weapons of mass destruction on its own people. Not that it is by any means sure that the government did in fact gas its own. You know as well as we do that this sort of ‘public information’ is often bogus and usually meaningless.

But even if it were true, we can’t understand why gas is necessarily worse than bullets or bombs. When you’re dead, you’re dead. Does it really make any difference if you were gassed or shot?

And why should an American care how the Assad regime establishes law and order in its own country?

As for credibility, don’t make us laugh.

Oh wait… it’s not about the dead people. It’s about geopolitics. That’s what John Kerry says.

Kerry invokes apocalyptic ‘domino theory’ in call with House Democrats

In a Labor Day conference call with 127 House Democrats, Secretary of State John Kerry invoked an apocalyptic scenario, summoning visions of American power and credibility incinerated in a terrible Middle East-wide conflagration laced with nerve gas and enriched uranium.

An aide to one of the members of Congress who participated in the call told me that Kerry warned that the failure to punish Bashar Al-Assad for using chemical weapons on Syrian civilians could lead to future chemical attacks on Israel and Turkey, emboldening Iran to forge ahead with an alleged nuclear weapons program and perhaps even enter the battlefield in support of Syria. Next, Kerry hammered on the Holocaust, declaring that the US faced a “Munich moment” on Syria.

The member of Congress, a staunch opponent of a US strike on Syria, described Kerry’s pitch as an updated rendition of the Vietnam-era domino theory, which held that if South Vietnam fell, communism would spread across Southeast Asia. “By the end Kerry was practically telling us the Earth was going to fall into the Sun,” the member of Congress commented to aides afterwards.

Munich moment? Say what?

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, enter your email address below.

Because these emails are completely free, we do have to fund them with advertising. Occasionally we will send you promotional emails, however we will never give, sell or rent your email address to any other companies.For more information, please see our Privacy policy.

ScreenHunter_01 Mar. 25 09.51

New to MoneyWeek?

Bill-bonner

Welcome, and thank you for visiting us.

Here at MoneyWeek, our aim is simple. To give you intelligent and enjoyable commentary on the most important financial stories of the week, and show you how to profit from them.

If you've enjoyed what you've read so far, we've got something you'll definitely be interested in.

Every week day, Monday to Friday, we send out a thought provoking and often controversial email called the Daily Reckoning. In it, we try to figure out the markets and how current economical events are shaping the world we live in. If you're interested in investment opportunities and the markets, we think you should be reading it…

With your permission, I'd like to send you the Daily Reckoning for FREE.

To sign-up enter your email address below.

(No thanks)

We hope you enjoy your stay on the site.

Bill Bonner,
Editor, The Daily Reckoning

Because these emails are completely free, we do have to fund them with advertising. Occasionally we will send you promotional emails, however we will never give, sell or rent your email address to any other companies.For more information, please see our Privacy policy.

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

4 Responses

  1. 04/09/2013, OldmaninDorset wrote

    Hi Bill. We’ll all watch this particular posse ride off into the sunrise, with grim foreboding. One day the US will meet its match and then everyone will have to run for cover.

  2. 04/09/2013, Haddock wrote

    Quite agree with Bill on this. About 10% of Syria’s population has now left the country, and USA should save its cruise missiles and other munitions, and spend the money instead on supplying and supporting the refugee camps in Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Jordan. This is far more humanitarian and moral than bombing a morally bankrupt tyrant who is already finished politically anyway. Let us help the people of Syria, not rain more bombs on their already ravaged country. This is what Obama should be talking to Putin about at G20.

  3. 05/09/2013, LERENARD wrote

    It is perhaps worth remembering that the village of Armageddon lies in Syria.

  4. 05/09/2013, Hedgehog44 wrote

    I always enjoy Bill’s frequent bouts of common sense. But given the global status attributed to chemical weapons, Assad must have done this deliberately to test the West. To back off, for which there are many potent arguments, not least the failures in Iraq and Afghanistan, opens the door for further oppression. But I want to ask this. The biggest purchasers of arms in the world are (I believe) the rich nations of the Middle East. Why do they stand on the sidelines, and let the west get bloodied, politically at least? Their hypocrisy cries out to the world. Where is Saudi Arabia?

Comment on this article

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Walking out on the banks

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 3 FREE Issues
Shale gas 'fracking' promises to transform Britain's energy market. Find out what it is, what it means, and how to invest.

More from MoneyWeek

The problem with the Bank of England

Fracking: Nine reasons not to get carried away

Five small-cap stocks worth a flutter

This Dutch company could help us tame floods

ScreenHunter_01 Mar. 25 09.51

The latest investment opportunities & how you can profit - sign up to our FREE daily email HERE