Counterfeiters Anonymous

“Products are paid for with products,” said Jean-Baptiste Say.

He meant, that if you want to get something, you’d better have something you can trade for it.

What then, would he make of America’s latest GDP report?

Last week brought two important bits of information: one deceptive, the other fraudulent.

The deceptive news was that the Fed, in its last Ben Bernanke moment, said it would stay the course. The course in question is the 12-step ‘Counterfeiters Anonymous’ programme popularly known as ‘tapering off‘.

The Fed says it will stay on it. By doing so, it has deceived investors into believing either that the central bank’s PhDs were steadfast in their commitment to get rid of quantitative easing (QE), or that the economy was healthy enough that it didn’t need it. Neither of those things is true.

Meanwhile, the US economy grew at a 3.2% annual pace in the last quarter of 2013, still the weakest ‘recovery’ ever recorded. But since 1950 the composition of the US economy has changed so substantially that GDP ‘growth’ no longer means what it used to mean.

“Disappointing numbers on jobs and housing also raise concerns about whether the economy is accelerating,” reports the WSJ.


Bill Bonner on markets, economics & the madness of crowds

To sign-up to Bill's free daily email just enter your email address below

Because these emails are completely free, we do have to fund them with advertising. Occasionally we will send you promotional emails, however we will never give, sell or rent your email address to any other companies.For more information, please see our Privacy policy.


Wait. Jobs and housing are fairly important. If the news from those quarters is  disappointing, what’s really up with the economy?

Then, the explanation: “A big driver of growth in the fourth quarter was consumer spending, which grew 3.3%.”

The WSJ then quotes Bill Simon, Walmart’s USA CEO: “I never cease to be amazed at the American consumers. They figure out ways to make it work…”

We are not so much amazed as appalled. And we are not so much reassured at this ‘recovery’, however weak, as we are alarmed by it. Where did consumers get the money?

They didn’t earn it, so they had to “run down their balance sheets”, either by spending their savings, or borrowing. That makes this a new kind of growth; the more you get the poorer you are.

The economy used to grow by making people wealthier. Now, consumers go further into debt, while their incomes are stagnant or falling.

In 1980, a $7trn economy included $2trn of what Tim Morgan calls “globally marketable output” (GMO) – real wealth, the kind of stuff you can sell to pay your bills. But then, the economy underwent plastic surgery at the hands of quack policy-makers. Now, it’s almost unrecognisable.

Today, we have a $16trn economy. But how much of that is GMO? Well, about $13trn is consumer spending. And various statistical adjustments. Only $3trn is what Mr Morgan calls GMO.

That’s the real growth of the US economy since 1980 – a piddly, pathetic $30bn a year. Barely enough to keep up with population increases.

Growth? Forget it.

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, enter your email address below.

Because these emails are completely free, we do have to fund them with advertising. Occasionally we will send you promotional emails, however we will never give, sell or rent your email address to any other companies.For more information, please see our Privacy policy.

[xyz_lbx_custom_shortcode id=5]

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

3 Responses

  1. 03/02/2014, steveH wrote

    We think the Bills have made a mistake; your figures show GMO growth is 30Bn$ a year not 3Bn

  2. 03/02/2014, Moderator wrote

    steveH: Yes, you’re right. It should be $30bn. We’ve amended the article. Thanks.

  3. 03/02/2014, Steve Nicholls wrote

    Hi Bill,
    I don’t think Ive ever disagreed with you on any of your articles, its all good, its all sensible, logiclal, and god knows your on top of things more than any of us………Nothings really changes in life though, the very wealthy and powerful policy makers are all in bed together, and will do anything to avoid a depression after all none of us really want it,…… but they alas have much much more to lose if there is a collapse…they will do anything to avoid a this, QE, manipulation, glossing over problems, cuts, you name it !!…….if 5% of the people of the world own approx. 90% of the wealth !!..that’s lots of power to them !!….what chance do we have ? we are just pawns in there little game……….realistically we should have had a massive crash /collapse by now but it has not happened ! …..this bewilderment carnt last forever nothing ever does !…. a good thing really…

    ……….Steve Nicholls

Comment on this article

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
A new lease of life?

The drugs transforming old age

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues
Shale gas 'fracking' promises to transform Britain's energy market. Find out what it is, what it means, and how to invest.

More from MoneyWeek

FREE REPORT:
What you should really do with your money (2014 Edition)


How to buy and sell penny shares

A beginner's guide to investing in gold

How to invest in British fracking