A case for destruction

Our subject yesterday was the destruction of our civilisation.

Today, we take up a related question: so what?

You’ll recall, we’ve been reporting on the work of macro-economist Richard Duncan. We went down the road with him, from the causes of the stock-market boom to the inevitable bust, thence to the Fed’s inevitable reaction and to another leg up in the stock market. But here is where we part company.

Mr Duncan believes that a credit deflation would be devastating. We have come to rely so heavily on credit from the Fed, he says, that taking it away would mean chaos, depression and war.

“In all probability, our civilisation would not survive it”, he concludes.

Faced with such a calamity he believes there is no way to go back to the sound principles of 19th century banking and finance. Instead, we have no choice but to go ahead.

But to where? And how?

Hold on. One question at a time, please.

To where? Japan! How? Use the same techniques the Japanese used. It worked there, didn’t it?

The Fed is fully committed to staying the course. That is, if credit deflation gets established in the US, it will have to be over Janet Yellen’s dead body. Ms Yellen is not likely to let it happen; not if she can prevent it.

But there’s the rub. If credit is going to keep expanding, someone has to borrow more – a lot more.

FREE daily investment email from MoneyWeek
Receive our thought-provoking investment email Money Morning every weekday morning, plus occasional promotions, & become a smarter investor.

Please enter a valid email address

To sign up, enter your email address:

Debt in the household sector topped out in 2007. With total US debt at more than 600% of disposable income, and mortgage debt far out of proportion to rents, households were tapped out. They had spent so much in the past they had nothing left for the future.

Since then, they have managed to reduce their debt levels, although the last few months showed that they may be getting ready to borrow a bit more. In any case, they won’t be able to borrow much, because they don’t have the disposable income to support it. And there is no sign that incomes will increase substantially.

If households can’t continue to add debt, who can? Next in line is the corporate sector. Corporations have been doing a manly job of borrowing lately. As if to show that the guys who get the big bucks are no smarter than anyone else, they are borrowing money on an epic scale largely to buy their own shares at record prices. That’s right – buy high – at least it helps raise the bonuses.

But there can’t be much more of that juice in the lemon, either. Corporate earnings are now heading down. Like a household’s disposable income, lower corporate earnings leave the sector with less money to pay finance charges.

That leaves the government. Bless their greedy little hearts, politicians can be relied upon to do the worst thing at the worst possible moment. What is the worst thing a highly indebted government can do? That’s right, borrow more. When is the worst time to do it? When there is no real reason to do so, no national emergency that makes it necessary. In WWII, borrowing was an emergency. Today, it is an imbecility.

We could add an additional question. What is the worst possible way for a government to borrow money? It is to borrow it from the central bank, which merely prints up the cash on request.

That is what the US government will do. More or less like the Japanese. That is what we expect. It is also what Richard Duncan expects. But he thinks it is something the feds must do to avoid the collapse of civilisation.

The Japanese government has about twice as much debt/GDP as the US federal government. That gives the US lots of room to add debt – about $17trn worth. And that is where we leave him.

A financial system that makes bankers, speculators, and Washington insiders rich, while everyone else gets poorer and more heavily laden with debt is not worth saving. The sooner we have shucked it off, the better off we will be.

FREE daily investment email from MoneyWeek
Receive our thought-provoking investment email Money Morning every weekday morning, plus occasional promotions, & become a smarter investor.

Please enter a valid email address

To sign up, enter your email address:

[xyz_lbx_custom_shortcode id=5]

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

  • Regentsplace

    Hey Bill,

    I read yesterday’s article and googled Richard and read a very in-depth article and agreed with him…..until we got to what to do now-and completely disagreed with him. I thought for a second you may have gone over to the dark side-thank god you haven’t-I’d have been crushed!

  • PaulB

    Hello Bill,

    To reciprocate all your kind food for thought:-

    I don’t understand! {Do you?}
    Perhaps you have not seen this brilliant ‘Nobel prize’ explanation as to why:

    You can view it from abroad with ‘Hola’ I believe.

    Paul B.

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Prime location

The best property buys in the eurozone

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues

Which investment platform?

When it comes to buying shares and funds, there are several investment platforms and brokers to choose from. They all offer various fee structures to suit individual investing habits.
Find out which one is best for you.

22 May 1980: Pac-Man hits the arcades

It didn't take long for Pac-Man, or Puck Man as it was originally called in Japan, to become a worldwide craze after it was released on this day in 1980.

The Kids' Portfolio: the four best funds to buy for your children

Investing for your children's long-term future is an excellent idea. But what should you buy? The Kids' Portfolio is a simple collection of four funds intended to be tucked away for 20 to 40 years.