“Obama says he won’t give an inch,” said a French friend. “What’s going on over there? Are they crazy?”
Every expert warns about how dangerous this is for the economy. Every talking head on TV, every commentator, every analyst – all presume or explicitly announce that cutting off federal spending would be a bad thing.
Capital digs in for the long haul, says the Wall Street Journal. Resignation seems to be the dominant tone in the US press.
Bloomberg looked at the matter from a couple of angles. First, it looked at the democratic implications, noting that Americans by 72% oppose shutdown tied to health care cuts. The headline leaves some ambiguity; perhaps they would approve of a shutdown tied to cuts in education or defence spending. But we doubt it.
Then, Bloomberg looks at it from an economic standpoint. How much will this thing cost, it wants to know. It soon finds a source willing to make an estimate: Shutdown to cost $300 million a day, IHS says.
Who’s IHS? We had the same question. Bloomberg explains:
A partial shutdown of the federal government will cost the U.S. at least $300 million a day in lost economic output at the start, according to IHS Inc.
While that is a small fraction of the country’s $15.7 trillion economy, the daily impact of a shutdown is likely to accelerate if it continues as it depresses confidence and spending by businesses and consumers.
Lexington, Massachusetts-based IHS, a global market research firm, estimates that its forecast for 2.2 percent annualized growth in the fourth quarter will be reduced 0.2 percentage point in a weeklong shutdown. A 21-day closing like the one in 1995-96 could cut growth by 0.9 to 1.4 percentage point, according to Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott LLC in Philadelphia. “Government spending touches every aspect of the economy, and disruption of spending, more than the direct loss of income, threatens to damage investor and business confidence in ways that can seriously harm economic growth,” LeBas said yesterday in an interview.
That’s it. We can’t take any more. The economics profession has turned itself into a bunch of toadies for the politicians and world-improvers. The nonsense. The claptrap. It’s time to stand up and be counted!
One. Well, is there anybody else? Are we all alone?
Bill Bonner on markets, economics & the madness of crowds
Get Bill's free daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' sent straight to your inbox
There are two ways to get what you want. Force and violence on the one had. Or trade and persuasion on the other. (Somewhere in the middle is fraud, but let’s ignore that for the moment.)
An economy is built on trade and persuasion. You have to do something that others will pay you for. You make something. You offer some service. Others do the same – offering you something that you want. One makes a pair of shoes, another brews up some beer. Oh, you know how it works!
But one part of the economy doesn’t work that way. That’s the part that the government controls. That part depends on brute force. No customer has to be satisfied. No real want has to be addressed. No ‘meeting of the minds’, between buyer and seller, ever has to take place. Either you pay your taxes or the feds put you in jail. Either you do as you are told or, they put you in prison.
“America has changed so much”, continued our French friend. “I used to visit every summer when I was a teenager. It was a rite of passage for the French. America was so free. So different from Europe. We would go to California and hitch-hike up and down the coast. It was the 1960s. Everyone was unbelievably friendly and open. I loved it.
“But I went back just this summer. It’s a different place. They treat you like a war criminal when you go through customs. And you wouldn’t think of hitch-hiking. People are still nice. But that spirit of freedom seems to have disappeared. It’s a lot more like Europe now. But with more police.”
Yes, it is more like Europe, where government plays a larger role.
And now, would reducing the role of government really make people worse off? Would less brute force in the economy really be a disaster? What if people only got more of what they really wanted, only what they could get by honest manufacture, trade and commerce? What if the zombies were cut back? Would that be so bad?
• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here.
Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do
New to MoneyWeek?
Welcome, and thank you for visiting us.
Here at MoneyWeek, our aim is simple. To give you intelligent and enjoyable commentary on the most important financial stories of the week, and show you how to profit from them.
If you've enjoyed what you've read so far, we've got something you'll definitely be interested in.
Every week day, Monday to Friday, we send out a thought provoking and often controversial email called the Daily Reckoning. In it, we try to figure out the markets and how current economical events are shaping the world we live in. If you're interested in investment opportunities and the markets, we think you should be reading it…
With your permission, I'd like to send you the Daily Reckoning for FREE.
We hope you enjoy your stay on the site.
Editor, The Daily Reckoning